| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100 |
1181. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
And for the billionth time, I'm not against raiding (I'm extremely pro almost any game expansion) but I am against ezmode auto-pub-queues being dressed up as PC training. We have those, they're called Faction WarFare.
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.21 17:33:00
|
1182. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: If your district isn't being defended odds are you should loosen up the recruiting and bring in more people and allow them to participate in PC raid battles to train them for the real deal. Which will be where newer/sma...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.21 17:26:00
|
1183. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: "Same risk" between raiders (who can choose the when and where of a conflict) and defenders (who will pay losses from their districts assets that they've worked to develop) implicitly states that raide...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.20 23:59:00
|
1184. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
"Same risk" between raiders (who can choose the when and where of a conflict) and defenders (who will pay losses from their districts assets that they've worked to develop) implicitly states that raiders must possess some "thing" ( not their MCC c...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.20 21:08:00
|
1185. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: No. All your demands will do is deter newer corps from participating entirely. It's not a compromise, you're pushing for raiding to be a zero-impact nonfactor, and bluntly it...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.20 21:04:00
|
1186. In the news.... - in The War Room [original thread]
lolpubscrubs in the WR General Discussions is thataway --/\__~->
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.20 20:31:00
|
1187. How Many here think I should make a new caracter and give it new nam... - in The War Room [original thread]
Every altscrub in the game also trying to avoid responsibility for their actions.
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.20 20:07:00
|
1188. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: No. All your demands will do is deter newer corps from participating entirely. It's not a compromise, you're pushing for raiding to be a zero-impact nonfactor, and bluntly it's not contributing anything useful to the dis...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.20 19:24:00
|
1189. Brand-New Corporation Looks Toward PC !!! - in The War Room [original thread]
Leadfoot10 wrote: Good luck, SoLJae! Let us know when you get 16, and we'll have some fun..... Ditto this. o7
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.20 19:04:00
|
1190. Logistics slot progression(still). - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
PS Role variation is exactly that, variation. Variation which, based on function, determines what its essentials are. Function which, based on bonusing, is either maximised or not. Slot parity of Logis to Assaults I believe needlessly leans that ...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.13 00:14:00
|
1191. Logistics slot progression(still). - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: But should variation between roles not be defined by its ability to fit the essentials and more so based around the Role bonuses to define the role? Even if you don't like the concept of matching the Logistics to the Assaul...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.12 23:44:00
|
1192. Logistics slot progression(still). - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Varoth Drac wrote: Actually I believe Amarr logis only have 4 lows at proto, making only 7 mod slots. This follows the old Amarr assault trend of having less slots. It was agreed that this was silly and Amarr assaults got the same total slots a...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.12 23:14:00
|
1193. Logistics slot progression(still). - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Yes, I'm aware that a couple patches back (as part of the greater overhaul) Assault frames were given their Logis layouts at Proto. My issue making that scheme the uniform standard down the line is to ...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.12 23:01:00
|
1194. Logistics slot progression(still). - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I would much much rather they all had sidearms.
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.12 22:35:00
|
1195. Logistics slot progression(still). - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Do NOT parrallel Logi slot progression to Assaults. Care to elaborate as to why you feel that way? EDIT: You do realize that Proto Assaults and Proto Logistics basically share the same slot layout...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.12 22:34:00
|
1196. Logistics slot progression(still). - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Give my CalLogi a cpu buff and a sidearm. Do NOT parrallel Logi slot progression to Assaults.
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.12 21:31:00
|
1197. hi =ƒÿü hola =ƒÿÇ - in The War Room [original thread]
Juandeer Woman wrote: MR MOJOO wrote: I'm the Latino director So if you need anything from cap aq just message me instead of shepherd grey Soy El director Latino de cap aq So si necesitas algo the nosotros mensajame amI y no shepherd Jo...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.12 19:44:00
|
1198. hi =ƒÿü hola =ƒÿÇ - in The War Room [original thread]
Shepherd Grey wrote: think Operator took one too many rips before entering this thread Dood, Salsa Celtica is legit . If the AfroCuban jazz aspect is too much, try a group called Outback or their derivative projects, Baka and Baka Bey...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.12 19:13:00
|
1199. Rep tool - in The War Room [original thread]
Ghost Kaisar wrote: MCLOVIN619 wrote: in my opinion a logi shouldn't need 26 meters enough to warrent a lai dai, in pubs tho I got u I'll say this: Short range rep tools leave room for multikills. Logi/Heavy on a short leash makes them e...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.12 19:07:00
|
1200. Rep tool - in The War Room [original thread]
Atiim wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Somebody last night (might have been Munson, but I think it was Kalash) said there's a firm plan to add a shield repping tool of some sort. Lookout, bitches! Being OP hasn't even started yet! Well sadly the...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2015.02.12 19:05:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |