| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
921. Sniping Problem. - in Technical Support/Bugs [original thread]
Let me give you a little perspective. I stopped trying to snipe up on those towers when I was a newberry 6 months ago.
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.31 05:04:00
|
922. The Problem with Assault Dropships - in General Discussions [original thread]
this is not true at all OP forge gunners can keep a dropship away from a key location, even if they don't kill it and swarms are probably better against them now than they were before so your argument about being chased to the redline in a rail...
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.31 04:18:00
|
923. Announcement:An Announcement Regarding Real Life Harassment - in General Discussions [original thread]
KaTaLy5t-87 wrote: Where I come from, harassment is a serious crime and if found guilty of any form of harassment then you would face several years in prison, a very costly legal bill and an extremely costly compensation payment to the victim. ...
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.30 23:57:00
|
924. Who here has stayed 'True'? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I-Shayz-I wrote: I tried staying true logi but kept dying 10+ times in a match from shotgun scouts while I'm trying to run a support logi. Then I went back to heavy and died even more. Then I tried the commando, and while I didn't die as much I...
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 23:28:00
|
925. Can cloaked scouts be scanned? - in General Discussions [original thread]
BARDAS wrote: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvYSJ6FRJlihdHRWMFFxUDVPbzZPVTdjZmNwR2loYXc&usp=sharing#gid=0 EDIT: Proto skilled Gal Scout with 1 Complex Damp will be able to hide from everything but a Cal Scout...
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 23:26:00
|
926. Can cloaked scouts be scanned? - in General Discussions [original thread]
With proto'd out max dampening? I'm not a scout, so idk.
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 23:20:00
|
927. Who else prefers HMG nerf over sentinel eHP nerf? - in General Discussions [original thread]
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: The dark cloud wrote: Not this again. Heavys are fine as they are now. Stop beeing scrubs. The crutch machine gun needs nerfing But the shotgun should also be subject to that same nerf. Just 10% no more.
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 23:18:00
|
928. New info on 1.9 HEAVY SUITS! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: Since when is "YOURSELVES" censored? YOLOBITCHES
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 23:17:00
|
929. Who else prefers HMG nerf over sentinel eHP nerf? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Or force heavy slots to fit only heavy weapons. I am for this idea, but I also think Commandos are far better at it now.
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 23:15:00
|
930. Who else prefers HMG nerf over sentinel eHP nerf? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fiddlestaxp wrote: Heavies too strong. 5% HMG nerf + 10% plate nerf + 5% heavy base hp nerf. How the hell did you get into TeamPlayers?
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 23:14:00
|
931. Remove vehicles from ambush and have vehicle deployment cost wp? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Come on dude. Are you even proto FG? I could solo two vehicles with that thing if my team isn't ****.
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 22:01:00
|
932. Who else prefers HMG nerf over sentinel eHP nerf? - in General Discussions [original thread]
LEHON Xeon wrote: The main nerf I want to HMG is the removal of that slowdown effect. As soon as you even get hit by one of those things, if you aren't nearby a corner where you can get around it in about a second, you're dead as you can't move...
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 21:58:00
|
933. What happened to the burst SMG? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I found myself wondering this for the ScP.
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 21:55:00
|
934. Who else prefers HMG nerf over sentinel eHP nerf? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: HMGs are nearly spot on right now... Well then why are they even thinking about nerfing heavies? In this case nothing should be changed.
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 21:51:00
|
935. Who else prefers HMG nerf over sentinel eHP nerf? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: bamboo x wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: NO! Think about what you're asking for. for the love of the Amarr's man sausage god, my minmatar heavy wouldn't be complete anymore, it's barely competitive now! Have y...
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 21:49:00
|
936. Who else prefers HMG nerf over sentinel eHP nerf? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: NO! Think about what you're asking for. for the love of the Amarr's man sausage god, my minmatar heavy wouldn't be complete anymore, it's barely competitive now! Have you even SEEN how negligible the ~10% nerf has...
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 21:46:00
|
937. Any hotfix for the forge bug? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Saberwing wrote: We have commented on this bug! Only, it's in the appropriate forum section and is a known issue. ( Link ) I'll push for a status update on this issue on Monday and see if we can get it sorted in the next round of hotfixes....
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 21:43:00
|
938. CCP TROLLS!!!!!!!!!!!! I found your forum script change!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Holy ****, I never realized there IS a quick reply because they hide it underneath an expandable frame...
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 21:41:00
|
939. Who else prefers HMG nerf over sentinel eHP nerf? - in General Discussions [original thread]
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: bamboo x wrote: I think it's only fair, both to heavies who are supposed to be HP tanks and are still being easily 2 or 3KOed by shotguns, and to the other classes having their rifles nerfed. It just shouldn't g...
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 21:39:00
|
940. Nerf Scout HP - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't think so. The cloak is the problem. It has no weakness, and it needs to be weak to flux or even drained by enemy fire.
- by bamboo x - at 2014.03.29 21:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |