| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
681. turrets we are missing - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Zero Harpuia wrote: By Wire Guided, do you mean fire, then manually guide the missiles? Also, wouldn't a Flak Cannon be more ideal? Also, you don't have any Small Turrets except for Rockets, if I may be so bold. Small...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.21 01:09:00
|
682. turrets we are missing - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: CharCharOdell wrote: We have: Long and short range hybrid Short range missiles (rockets in eve) We need: Artillery cannon (indirect fire) Auto cannon (giant hmg for slaying armor tanks up close) Pulse laser (medium (f...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.21 00:39:00
|
683. turrets we are missing - in General Discussions [original thread]
Blaze Ashra wrote: CharCharOdell wrote: We have: Long and short range hybrid Short range missiles (rockets in eve) We need: Artillery cannon (indirect fire) Auto cannon (giant hmg for slaying armor tanks up close) Pulse laser (medium (for...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.21 00:35:00
|
684. turrets we are missing - in General Discussions [original thread]
By Wire Guided, do you mean fire, then manually guide the missiles? Also, wouldn't a Flak Cannon be more ideal? Also, you don't have any Small Turrets except for Rockets, if I may be so bold. Small Hybrids are just... ugh.
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.21 00:33:00
|
685. calling for a strike ............ - in General Discussions [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: pamuku420tyme wrote: pegasis prime wrote: I wad also hinting at the possibility that they could also reward us accordingly to the isk we invested and our impact on the battlefield. So you are hinting at making IS...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 23:16:00
|
686. calling for a strike ............ - in General Discussions [original thread]
You get paid for the results, not for what gets them. In EVE, a belt rat isn't suddenly worth more if you kill it with bigger guns. As it stands, I get more than enough to recoup my losses and then some in every battle I've been in. If you're usin...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 22:37:00
|
687. To those complaining about "lack of content" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Why do I bother sometimes. I'm feeling argumentative, reply to my last post, or I declare myself the Supreme God...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 18:55:00
|
688. To those complaining about "lack of content" - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Why do I bother sometimes. I'm feeling argumentative, reply to my last post, or I declare myself the Supreme God Emperor of your thread...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 18:49:00
|
689. New Equipment Idea: ECM Scrambler - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yan Darn wrote: Zero Harpuia wrote: Mac Dac wrote: the mods work good enough for me. The passive modules are fine as-is, but any class besides Scout can't really afford to waste low slots on Profile Dampeners. Also, they have such larg...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 18:39:00
|
690. am I the only one that wants the core improved? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: If new content doesn't come until 1.6, it will mean we went 6 months without new content. 6 months of ONLY core improvements. That is a long time. While you get what YOU want for almost 6 months, and you complain ab...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 17:03:00
|
691. New Equipment Idea: ECM Scrambler - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sana Rayya wrote: We have a direct counter to the active scanner. They are called profile dampeners. I use them, as do others - not only scouts. Maybe you should try using them yourself. If you are a heavy, sorry, you DON'T GET TO EVADE SCANS. ...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 16:57:00
|
692. Active Scanner 'Eclipse' issue - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Logibro wrote: Moved to Technical Support/Bugs ...or Logibro will, thanks much.
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 13:27:00
|
693. Active Scanner 'Eclipse' issue - in General Discussions [original thread]
Krom Ganesh wrote: Actually, I believe this belongs in technical support/bugs and the Devs do check that forum frequently. Then I will move a less noisy version of the thread over there, thank you for the input.
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 13:26:00
|
694. Active Scanner 'Eclipse' issue - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spycrab Potato wrote: Zero Harpuia wrote: Spycrab Potato wrote: Put this in the right section next time. No one checks Feedback, and you know it. That doesn't change the fact that you should put it there. The Devs *might* check feedba...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 13:18:00
|
695. Active Scanner 'Eclipse' issue - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spycrab Potato wrote: Put this in the right section next time. No one checks Feedback, and you know it.
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 13:14:00
|
696. Active Scanner 'Eclipse' issue - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kasote Denzara wrote: AURUM items are meant to be less skill requiring. Keep in mind that these items are not as good as the one they are covering. Skills make the items, really. No, I mean... you know how the STD AURUM level item is the sam...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 13:13:00
|
697. New Equipment Idea: ECM Scrambler - in General Discussions [original thread]
You just don't get it and don't CHOOSE to get it. You use the Active Scanner and don't want to see it 'nerfed', I get that, but for the love of god get your head out of your anus. Sana Rayya wrote: Again, you're essentially replacing low slot...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 13:10:00
|
698. Active Scanner 'Eclipse' issue - in General Discussions [original thread]
The 'Eclipse' Active Scanner, meant to be the AURUM free skills one, is actually set to the same stats as the 'Acolyth' A-86, the 'Standard equip, Advanced capability' variant. As such, there is no reason to buy the more expensive 'Acolyth', and i...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 12:56:00
|
699. New Equipment Idea: ECM Scrambler - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sana Rayya wrote: Hmm, seems like my interpretation of how this would work differs from yours. So please explain the best way to design this device and we will go from there. Info like duration, radius (magnitude and whether spherical like nan...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 03:04:00
|
700. New Equipment Idea: ECM Scrambler - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sana Rayya wrote: 1) If your scrambler is deployable, then it's automatically not an "active" piece of equipment. A nanohive or drop uplinks are not "active" pieces of equipment just because they take up a slot; in my definition, a piece of equ...
- by Zero Harpuia - at 2013.09.20 00:36:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |