Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Sana Rayya
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL
203
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 23:51:00 -
[31] - Quote
1) If your scrambler is deployable, then it's automatically not an "active" piece of equipment. A nanohive or drop uplinks are not "active" pieces of equipment just because they take up a slot; in my definition, a piece of equipment is "active" when it must be equipped in order to be used - repair tools, nanite injectors, active scanners.
2) Active scanners and your proposed scramblers are not equitable. Scanning intel only aids you and your squad, has a limited range, is directional, and must constantly be refreshed. Further, because the scanner is active, it means that in order to use it you must switch to it and hence don't have your gun out. Your scrambler seems to be a deployable piece of equipment that affects everyone in its radius, not only your squadmates. If your scrambler had to be equipped like the scanner, was directional or very limited in radius, and only worked for a short period, say 10-30 seconds before it needed to be refreshed, then you might have an argument and it might not be OP. It seems to me that this isn't what you're going for.
From my interpretation of your proposal, you could simply put multiple scramblers on rooftops or hard to get areas and hide your entire team from scanning detection so long as they stayed within the scrambler's overlapping range. Hence its OP.
Not all suits need to be invisible from scans. If we're talking proto scanners, heavy suits can't dodge them no matter how many dampeners they stack. But last time I checked, heavy suits don't register on scanners with a minimap signature more pronounced than any other suit, so if you see a scanned target around the corner it could very well be a fatty with dampened friends to ambush you.
In the end, it all comes down to what you think is worthwhile to sacrifice on your suit in order to gain an ability. I know how powerful scanners are so I invested in profile dampeners despite having to give up armor plates or shield regulators to use them.
Think of it another way. As I said, triage nanohives can more or less replace your armor repairers, right? Imagine then if the triage hive had a 50-100m radius, didn't need LOS to heal you, and would constantly heal you without popping until it was destroyed. Sounds OP, doesn't it? It's pretty much what you're asking your scrambler to do.
I also don't agree with your notion that equipment must battle equipment. We don't have devices that nullify nanite injectors or repair tools, or drop uplinks and nanohives. If we did, people would just skill into that stuff and equipment use would drop, or one side wouldn't have it and would hence be destroyed, etc. It really just leads to stale gameplay. |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
957
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 00:36:00 -
[32] - Quote
Sana Rayya wrote:1) If your scrambler is deployable, then it's automatically not an "active" piece of equipment. A nanohive or drop uplinks are not "active" pieces of equipment just because they take up a slot; in my definition, a piece of equipment is "active" when it must be equipped in order to be used - repair tools, nanite injectors, active scanners.
2) Active scanners and your proposed scramblers are not equitable. Scanning intel only aids you and your squad, has a limited range, is directional, and must constantly be refreshed. Further, because the scanner is active, it means that in order to use it you must switch to it and hence don't have your gun out. Your scrambler seems to be a deployable piece of equipment that affects everyone in its radius, not only your squadmates. If your scrambler had to be equipped like the scanner, was directional or very limited in radius, and only worked for a short period, say 10-30 seconds before it needed to be refreshed, then you might have an argument and it might not be OP. It seems to me that this isn't what you're going for.
From my interpretation of your proposal, you could simply put multiple scramblers on rooftops or hard to get areas and hide your entire team from scanning detection so long as they stayed within the scrambler's overlapping range. Hence its OP.
Not all suits need to be invisible from scans. If we're talking proto scanners, heavy suits can't dodge them no matter how many dampeners they stack. But last time I checked, heavy suits don't register on scanners with a minimap signature more pronounced than any other suit, so if you see a scanned target around the corner it could very well be a fatty with dampened friends to ambush you.
In the end, it all comes down to what you think is worthwhile to sacrifice on your suit in order to gain an ability. I know how powerful scanners are so I invested in profile dampeners despite having to give up armor plates or shield regulators to use them.
Think of it another way. As I said, triage nanohives can more or less replace your armor repairers, right? Imagine then if the triage hive had a 50-100m radius, didn't need LOS to heal you, and would constantly heal you without popping until it was destroyed. Sounds OP, doesn't it? It's pretty much what you're asking your scrambler to do.
I also don't agree with your notion that equipment must battle equipment. We don't have devices that nullify nanite injectors or repair tools, or drop uplinks and nanohives. If we did, people would just skill into that stuff and equipment use would drop, or one side wouldn't have it and would hence be destroyed, etc. It really just leads to stale gameplay.
You aren't thinking clearly at all. The Repair Tool and Active Scanner have infinite uses and can be used on the go. The Nanohive and the proposed Scrambler need to be restocked.
1. The Scrambler will be as active as a nanohive, and as fallible. A single well placed Flux grenade and it's out. Furthermore, you can only carry one in my envisioned setup, so you would have to manually restock them at a Depot in case of destruction. Furthermore, if it were 'active' the way you think active counts, then it would be blatently overpowered or utterly useless. See my response to MAC earlier in the thread.
2. You still have to swap to and place the Scrambler, and it is far from infallible. A good Active Scanner could still pierce the ECM cloud, encouraging ranking up in both trees to outdo possible higher rank Scramblers/Scanners. Also, having a 'directional' Scrambler would be insane and impractical, and having a mobile one would make the Passive Dampeners obsolete, as I stated in my reply to MAC. If they can be placed in hard-to-reach areas, then it's harder for you to scan a base... so? Bases should have some kind of ECM inherent to them, players having to place them is decent enough. It's as 'OP' as a Drop Uplink, so your argument holds no water. You also assume I want OMGZ 100METER OPZ, when roughly 20-40 meters would be more than fine, as well as your repeated assumption that they are infallable. Just use better Active Scanners if you want a decent readout, skill up in the active scanners. there is no real need to do that currently, once you hit Quantum you're done.
Also, quick question. HOW IN THE KITTEN IS IT OP? Do you remember the days before we had active scanners? Not too long ago. As it stands, the ACTIVE SCANNER could be seen as OP, you just take out your infinite use 'gun' and get to see whether or not you'll have resistance as well as a rough estimate of how much. We don't have counters to repair tools or injectors because the counter to them is BULLETS. They heal, so you shoot. They raise HP, you lower it. They deploy Hives, Uplinks, and Scramblers, YOU have a Flux Grenade. THEY deploy an Active Scanner, and you can eat fecal matter and love it. You can use Dampeners to counter Scanners, why not have an Equipment Dampener to achieve a mirror effect to a Equipment Scanner? I know you love your little Gallentean toy, but I will not budge on this. We need the ECM Scrambler.
|
Sana Rayya
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL
204
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 02:10:00 -
[33] - Quote
Hmm, seems like my interpretation of how this would work differs from yours. So please explain the best way to design this device and we will go from there.
Info like duration, radius (magnitude and whether spherical like nanohives or linear like scanners), how the dampening works (i.e. deducting a specific dB number or percentage from the scan profiles of anyone in its radius) etc. Does it work on equipment? Or only infantry? What about vehicles? If they overlap is the effect increased by that much? Will the device itself show up on scans?
The reason I like the scanner and dampeners as they are now is because everyone uses scanners nowadays, and therefore dampening can lend a huge tactical advantage seeing as so many rely on scanning results to be accurate. But you are forced to sacrifice modules on their suit to use dampeners, as it should be.
There is one technical aspect I would like to point out. I don't think heavies could be dampened at all using your system. The reason is this - to evade the advanced A-45 Quantum Scanner, you need to have a scan profile of under 36dB. Heavies start at 65dB. You seem to want the scramblers to be able to hide them without any additional dampening from their end, so that means either a magnitude reduction of 29dB or a percentage reduction of 45%. This means that any medium frame also benefiting from such a scrambler would be able to evade all proto scanners except the Duvolle Focused (15dB), which is an advantage that you don't seem to agree with. |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
957
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 03:04:00 -
[34] - Quote
Sana Rayya wrote:Hmm, seems like my interpretation of how this would work differs from yours. So please explain the best way to design this device and we will go from there.
Info like duration, radius (magnitude and whether spherical like nanohives or linear like scanners), how the dampening works (i.e. deducting a specific dB number or percentage from the scan profiles of anyone in its radius) etc. Does it work on equipment? Or only infantry? What about vehicles? If they overlap is the effect increased by that much? Will the device itself show up on scans?
The reason I like the scanner and dampeners as they are now is because everyone uses scanners nowadays, and therefore dampening can lend a huge tactical advantage seeing as so many rely on scanning results to be accurate. But you are forced to sacrifice modules on their suit to use dampeners, as it should be.
There is one technical aspect I would like to point out. I don't think heavies could be dampened at all using your system. The reason is this - to evade the advanced A-45 Quantum Scanner, you need to have a scan profile of under 36dB. Heavies start at 65dB. You seem to want the scramblers to be able to hide them without any additional dampening from their end, so that means either a magnitude reduction of 29dB or a percentage reduction of 45%. This means that any medium frame also benefiting from such a scrambler would be able to evade all proto scanners except the Duvolle Focused (15dB), which is an advantage that you don't seem to agree with.
All scanners, no matter the scan ability, can and will tell you if SOMETHING is where you scan (the message will be SOME MARGIN OF ERROR instead of NO MARGIN OF ERROR in the case of no targets) so that you can always, without fail, tell if there are defenders at all. I want the Scrambler to have a functional range of roughly the size of the innards of the Communications buildings at maximum, 50 meters if I eyeballed it right, at prototype. I'm not 100% sure what I want it to function on, either a flat number, a percentage, or some other stat that could be given to Scanners and Jammers. Let's call this stat Scanning Priority.
If I do a flat number or percentage, it needs to be enough to matter and enough to be very effective at it's role of blocking precise Active Scanner readouts. If so, it must, at minimum, block Medium suits from being scanned by equivalent level active scanners. There can be a variant at each level that has increased blocking power in exchange for range at each level, similar to the increased power, decreased wedge of the Active Scanners. Furthermore, each level should be able to block Heavies from the scans of the level below it unassisted. ADV Jammer blocks STD Scanner perfectly, but STD High Power version can still detect Heavies. If a Passive Dampener is used in conjunction with an active one, it can conceal the Heavy from same level modules. This would be a waste to any Heavy except one that is planning to have Logistics assistance and stay relatively still for the entire match.
So in simple terms, if all other related skills are Zero
Equal Level Scanner/Scrambler = Visible Heavy(Invisible w/Passive Dampener) Higher Scrambler = Invisible Heavies Higher Scanner = Visible Heavy and Medium(Invisible w/Passive Dampener)
30 meter range at STD, 35 at ADV, 40 at PRO. I intend on there not being a MLT, but there probably will be to sell BPOs... 1 held at every level and variant, no matter what. Possible variants for next level's power at previous level's range, and vise versa.
Also, I really hate bringing WP into this. Let's wait to see what WP rewards it should get based on the WP rewards for Active Scanners supposedly in 1.5. |
Sana Rayya
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL
204
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 12:43:00 -
[35] - Quote
Your version of the jammer is clearly overpowered. How can it not be, with a 20-40m linear radius (and unlimited vertical range), an infinite use unless physically destroyed, the ability to penetrate obstacles (no need for line of sight), and effecting the entire team (thereby nullifying an entire category of enemy equipment as well as friendly modules)? And proto jammers defeat proto scanners (28dB) for all medium/light suits, really? So the only way to counter a proto jammer is to equip the Duvolle Focused Scanner - a piece of equipment with the third highest PG requirement of anything in the game, and limited usefulness as a scanner itself?
Ideas like this look good on paper, but can't be implemented well without either being too weak or too OP. Again, you're essentially replacing low slots with an area of effect deployable, so the comparison to triage nanohives is justifiable. If triage hives had a nerfed repair - say 10 HP/sec, but had a 20-40m radius and could penetrate cover, you don't think these would be abused to hell because they were OP?
Are we really better served by equipment that makes radar useless? This should be the question you ask yourself. You are designing the next flavor of the month, and if implemented everyone will start using these. Do we get better, more exciting games if we know where most people are (give or take 1-2 people who can defeat scans), or if we don't know where anyone is (give or take 1-2 people who are idiots out in the open)?
Crappy intel makes for crappy games in my opinion. Active scanners have only become widely used because CCP decided to disable shared squad/team vision, which at least gave you a general direction of where most enemies were. Pre-1.4, this was enough to lead to a good engagement. Post-1.4, you have no idea where enemies are unless you either scan or have LOS on them yourself. If you don't, the best you can do is extrapolate from your blueberries on the Tacnet - what direction they are facing, whether you see gunfire, etc.
Give us a way to defeat the intel provided by scanners and we are back in the dark ages.
This jammer, by the way, isn't an equitable counter to active scanners simply because it is a deployable, "set it and forget it" item. Again, active scanners only benefit you and your squad, and must be constantly carried and used actively in order to give continuous intel. A passive droppable that defeated all but the Duvolle Focused Scanner would simply be spammed on rooftops, and would hide anyone under its umbrella. Nothing else in the game works that way. And getting WP for this? Really? I don't think active scanners need WP rewards, but at least the rewards they are applying are supposedly linked to kills, being a scan kill assist type system. Giving WP just because you allowed your allies to evade scans (scans being unlimited) results in an unlimited source of WP.
A less overpowered alternative would be to make jammers work like handheld scanners, or like triage nanohives. The handheld version of the jammer could be used immediately after being scanned; doing so wipes the highlight time of yourself and nearby friendlies within a certain radius. You will still momentarily show up on the enemy radar but assuming you are quick, your signature dies shortly afterward. Since scanners have a cool down time, this item should also have a cool down, but it still works in denying constant intel to the enemy. If implemented like triage hives, the jammer would have a very short radius and necessitate LOS; it would expend nanite clusters to reduce your scan profile by a certain number of dB per cycle up to a threshold (say, just under the active scanner of equitable level). You can either run to these to wipe your scan signature or sit in one of these and avoid scans entirely. Each scan resets your scan profile, meaning that every time you are scanned, more nanite clusters are eaten by the hive, and eventually it pops. If no one is using it then it doesn't consume nanite clusters even when the area is scanned.
Rest assured, if something like your version of the jammer does ever get implemented, I will be one of the first skilling them to proto and abusing the crap out of them. I love my droppables and yours would be an OP droppable to the extreme.
TL;DR - read the first word of every paragraph. |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
961
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 13:10:00 -
[36] - Quote
You just don't get it and don't CHOOSE to get it. You use the Active Scanner and don't want to see it 'nerfed', I get that, but for the love of god get your head out of your anus.
Sana Rayya wrote: Again, you're essentially replacing low slots with an area of effect deployable, so the comparison to triage nanohives is justifiable. THIS is what Active Scanners do as well. It isn't unfair to have a direct counter to it.
Sana Rayya wrote: So the only way to counter a proto jammer is to equip the Duvolle Focused Scanner - a piece of equipment with the third highest PG requirement of anything in the game, and limited usefulness as a scanner itself? There is no reason to use the Duvolle Focused Scanner at all currently, so this would be a good thing. If ONE guy on the enemy team is using a Proto level Jammer, ONE guy on your team should have to equip a Proto level Scanner. Fair as fair can be.
You just keep crying and crying about how OP it would be to have a counter to the Scanner, but this PARTICULAR line says it all...
Sana Rayya wrote: Are we really better served by equipment that makes radar useless? This should be the question you ask yourself. You are designing the next flavor of the month, and if implemented everyone will start using these. Do we get better, more exciting games if we know where most people are (give or take 1-2 people who can defeat scans), or if we don't know where anyone is (give or take 1-2 people who are idiots out in the open)? So the Active Scanner, which everyone uses, and will use more of once the WP are added, which allows you to see all of the enemy team except the Scouts, is TOTALLY not an OP FotM. While the device to counter it, which only does so by occluding Medium level suits who stay within the vicinity of Jammers, is TOTALLY an OP FothM.
Keep your bias out of my thread, and insult me directly instead of 'hiding' it in your post. I will not rest. |
Sana Rayya
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL
204
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 14:09:00 -
[37] - Quote
We have a direct counter to the active scanner. They are called profile dampeners. I use them, as do others - not only scouts. Maybe you should try using them yourself. If you are a heavy, sorry, you DON'T GET TO EVADE SCANS. Heavies are not supposed to be "ambush" fighters who rely on stealth - else they wouldn't have such a high scanning profile in the first place.
Anyway, not gonna waste any more time making arguments over why your hypothetical piece of equipment is a bad idea. Clearly you're not going to be convinced this is OP unless it is implemented and abused. And I said, if CCP decides to add something like this, I will be the first to abuse the hell out of it.
Until then enjoy getting scanned, or skill into dampeners. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic
6070
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 14:49:00 -
[38] - Quote
Sana Rayya wrote:We have a direct counter to the active scanner. They are called profile dampeners. I use them, as do others - not only scouts. Maybe you should try using them yourself. If you are a heavy, sorry, you DON'T GET TO EVADE SCANS. Heavies are not supposed to be "ambush" fighters who rely on stealth - else they wouldn't have such a high scanning profile in the first place.
Anyway, not gonna waste any more time making arguments over why your hypothetical piece of equipment is a bad idea. Clearly you're not going to be convinced this is OP unless it is implemented and abused. And I said, if CCP decides to add something like this, I will be the first to abuse the hell out of it.
Until then enjoy getting scanned, or skill into dampeners. There is both active and passive scanners. I don't see why there can't be both passive and active methods of scan evasion. |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
962
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 16:57:00 -
[39] - Quote
Sana Rayya wrote:We have a direct counter to the active scanner. They are called profile dampeners. I use them, as do others - not only scouts. Maybe you should try using them yourself. If you are a heavy, sorry, you DON'T GET TO EVADE SCANS. Heavies are not supposed to be "ambush" fighters who rely on stealth - else they wouldn't have such a high scanning profile in the first place.
Anyway, not gonna waste any more time making arguments over why your hypothetical piece of equipment is a bad idea. Clearly you're not going to be convinced this is OP unless it is implemented and abused. And I said, if CCP decides to add something like this, I will be the first to abuse the hell out of it.
Until then enjoy getting scanned, or skill into dampeners.
I use them on a few of my suits, but I would rather use an equipment slot as opposed to a Low slot. You ca use a High slot instead of Equipment for Scanners, why can't I for Dampeners? Your personal bias prevents you from seeing this. I can equip an Armor Repairer(Low), or a Triage Hive/Repair Tool(Equipment). Why can't I use an Equipment the same as you use a High slot then?
Also, as a Logistics player, I will enjoy scanning as opposed to being scanned, so goodbye and thanks for all the bumps. |
Yan Darn
DUST University Ivy League
160
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 17:51:00 -
[40] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:Mac Dac wrote:the mods work good enough for me. The passive modules are fine as-is, but any class besides Scout can't really afford to waste low slots on Profile Dampeners. Also, they have such larger profiles that it is that much easier to scan them. Adding an equipment item that can defend an area from scan attempts will prevent these defenders from being completely outclassed via placement, as well as prevent abuse due to the stationary nature of deploy-able equipment.
Scouts can't afford spend that many low slots either. Which is why I really like your idea - there doesn't need to be a more powerful scanner to counter it. It already exists.
Edit: Hadn't read the whole thread yet - on the face of it - a proto jammer should at least need the Med frames inside to have dampening 5 to evade 28db scans. |
|
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
1062
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 18:39:00 -
[41] - Quote
Yan Darn wrote:Zero Harpuia wrote:Mac Dac wrote:the mods work good enough for me. The passive modules are fine as-is, but any class besides Scout can't really afford to waste low slots on Profile Dampeners. Also, they have such larger profiles that it is that much easier to scan them. Adding an equipment item that can defend an area from scan attempts will prevent these defenders from being completely outclassed via placement, as well as prevent abuse due to the stationary nature of deploy-able equipment. Scouts can't afford spend that many low slots either. Which is why I really like your idea - there doesn't need to be a more powerful scanner to counter it. It already exists. Edit: Hadn't read the whole thread yet - on the face of it - a proto jammer should at least need the Med frames inside to have dampening 5 to evade 28db scans.
Lemme direct you here my friend. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=110190 Scouts don't really NEED Dampeners of any kind until Proto, a well trained one only needs one to turn completely electronically invisible. The point of the Jammer will be to allow defenders to stay invisible, or to allow a Vanguard Scout such as yourself to scramble enemy scanners to assist in an attack.
As for the Proto tier, I still feel they should cancel out equal modules. The Duvolle Focused exists, but it really doesn't have a purpose without a Jammer. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI
6344
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 14:39:00 -
[42] - Quote
Idea is still awesome. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI
6349
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 16:35:00 -
[43] - Quote
Anyone else want? |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
1064
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 04:06:00 -
[44] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:Anyone else want? I still want. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI
6388
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 00:36:00 -
[45] - Quote
Also want |
Talos Vagheitan
King Slayers
34
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 04:06:00 -
[46] - Quote
+1
Everything needs a counter |
Ghost Kaisar
Pradox One
401
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 04:46:00 -
[47] - Quote
Sana Rayya wrote: Your Ideas Are Crappy Give This A Rest TL;DR - read the first word of every paragraph.
I am giving you a +1. Not because I support your logic, but because that was the most clever way of bashing someone AND getting you point across that I have ever seen.
Made my day. |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
1066
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 05:46:00 -
[48] - Quote
Ghost Kaisar wrote:Sana Rayya wrote: Your Ideas Are Crappy Give This A Rest TL;DR - read the first word of every paragraph.
I am giving you a +1. Not because I support your logic, but because that was the most clever way of bashing someone AND getting you point across that I have ever seen. Made my day.
Someone else did it first, using the first letter of each paragraph. I'll dredge it up if I have the time. I did love his persistence though, gave me a mess of free bumps :3 |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI
6516
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 01:42:00 -
[49] - Quote
Still want |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
1083
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 02:26:00 -
[50] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:Still want Same here |
|
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI
6669
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 02:32:00 -
[51] - Quote
Still should happen |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI
6787
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 18:30:00 -
[52] - Quote
Surprised more people aren't supporting this idea, given the prevalence of active scanners.
Gû¦Gû+Supreme emperor god-kingpÇÉKAGEH¦PSHIpÇæ// Lord of the threads Gû¦Gû+
|
Draco Cerberus
Hell's Gate Inc
446
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 18:33:00 -
[53] - Quote
Not a bad idea +1 |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
1109
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 18:35:00 -
[54] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:Surprised more people aren't supporting this idea, given the prevalence of active scanners.
That might be why, truth be told. The number of people who have pride in their gear are but a small percentage of the people that use it. Most seek to exploit it, and would rather not have attention shone on the features that they hold dear to their boosting. For every person that would be happy about higher level tools having meaning, five would moan over the loss of spotter WP.
ECM Equipment
|
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI
6851
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 21:31:00 -
[55] - Quote
Should happen
Gû¦Gû+Supreme emperor god-kingpÇÉKAGEH¦PSHIpÇæ// Lord of the threads Gû¦Gû+
|
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
1115
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 17:18:00 -
[56] - Quote
Thinking of expanding on the OP. You think I should do that, or try not to clutter it?
ECM Equipment
|
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI
6984
|
Posted - 2013.11.09 18:45:00 -
[57] - Quote
Still want
Gû¦Gû+Supreme emperor god-kingpÇÉKAGEH¦PSHIpÇæ// Lord of the threads // Forum alt Gû¦Gû+
|
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
1132
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 00:15:00 -
[58] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:Still want Thanks for the Injector Mr. Logi :3
ECM Equipment
|
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI
7050
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 01:42:00 -
[59] - Quote
Do it
Gû¦Gû+Supreme emperor god-kingpÇÉKAGEH¦PSHIpÇæ// Lord of the threads // Forum alt Gû¦Gû+
|
Jackof All-Trades
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
257
|
Posted - 2013.11.16 22:55:00 -
[60] - Quote
It's sad that I have to bump such a good post...
"Pulvis et umbra sums." We are but dust and shadow GÇò Horace, The Odes of Horace
\
Omni-Specialist
/ Focus: Gallente
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |