| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
301. Incubus or Python - in General Discussions [original thread]
Azura Sakura wrote: Incubus, because small rails > python >:D Incubus receive no bonus for a rails, why not put a rails on a python?
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.02.06 01:45:00
|
302. Today I survived with 0 shield 0 armour ADS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Weird huh? I turned on my booster just as I took a rail in my python. I was burning like a desert rave but was able to accelerate up still. My shield came back up eventually and I had 0 armour still. I flew around and eventually landed, though I ...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.02.06 01:42:00
|
303. Today I survived with 0 shield 0 armour ADS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Weird huh? I turned on my booster just as I took a rail in my python. I was burning like a desert rave but was able to accelerate up still. My shield came back up eventually and I had 0 armour still. I flew around and eventually landed, though I ...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.02.06 01:36:00
|
304. What's the Point if Heavy Frames > Medium Frames in terms of ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Idk heavy assaults do have cons. In open ground they are at a huge disadvantage, on skirmish maps walking is not practical, and they are not as flexible suits. All said, they are tough to put down, but rolling with a squad will change things in...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.02.04 22:00:00
|
305. The dominance of long-range weapons. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Delta 749 wrote: A better solution IMO lies in map design If we had some installations with more enclosed spaces then suddenly the ARs range limitations are rendered moot It would be a boon for some of the non rifle weapons as well such as hav...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.02.04 06:19:00
|
306. Leaked screen shot of the Minmatar LAV! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Medic 1879 wrote: Min Lav Shows it about to run some one over, note the excellent camouflage. +1
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.02.03 05:56:00
|
307. I Think I Just Figured Out Small Turrets! - in General Discussions [original thread]
ugg reset wrote: Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote: Is there an LAV channel like 1st airborne? I wish. though I doubt that spamming LAVs would do much good. 1 or 2 tanks and your run is over. Are you sure? Two or three well coordina...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 19:54:00
|
308. The War for Corp battles: UPDATE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mikey The Bandaid wrote: Corp battles will eliminate the need for PFC. We all know how we at DL feel about PFC. Really? You can't win both PFC and Pubs. Where will the low tier players win? Corp battles are for players not as committed as PC...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 19:51:00
|
309. I Think I Just Figured Out Small Turrets! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Each turret works best with a certain vehicle! Out side of that, they're pretty bad. Tanks + Blaster : Used to keep infantry away when they're approaching, possible detonate jihad jeeps as well. Much more reliable than ...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 19:40:00
|
310. The War for Corp battles: UPDATE - in General Discussions [original thread]
843-BANE wrote: NAV HIV wrote: Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote: 843-BANE wrote: Sparky1510 wrote: Signed. I wasn't around for Corp battles, but this sounds like something I would like to see. I lead a small corp with some new pla...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 19:36:00
|
311. PC has just been shut down. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: So, essentially freeze all PC income so that it is only something to have that looks nice on paper and has absolutely no bearing anywhere else? In that case, why not just remove it entirely? If you are talking about only ...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 19:33:00
|
312. The War for Corp battles: UPDATE - in General Discussions [original thread]
843-BANE wrote: Sparky1510 wrote: Signed. I wasn't around for Corp battles, but this sounds like something I would like to see. I lead a small corp with some new players who don't yet understand this game. This sounds like a great way to ge...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 19:27:00
|
313. PC has just been shut down. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Meh As long as isk earned from PC doesn't stomp my ass all over the place then I really don't care. They can make 500 mil a day, as long as their invento...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 18:57:00
|
314. PC has just been shut down. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Meh As long as isk earned from PC doesn't stomp my ass all over the place then I really don't care. They can make 500 mil a day, as long as their inventory is separate from public domain ( public match suit inventor...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 18:49:00
|
315. The War for Corp battles: UPDATE - in General Discussions [original thread]
NAV HIV wrote: Zene Ren wrote: Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote: Zene Ren wrote: +1 for corp battles +1 for ISK free no reward corp battles with the only reward being the corp standings and +1 for Eve/Dust deeper integration Let...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 18:45:00
|
316. The War for Corp battles: UPDATE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zene Ren wrote: +1 for corp battles +1 for ISK free no reward corp battles with the only reward being the corp standings and +1 for Eve/Dust deeper integration Let me get his straight, no isk loss from suit loss in CBs? If so, what would ...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 18:33:00
|
317. The War for Corp battles: UPDATE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: Varjac Theobroma Montenegro wrote: Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: Considering there are 15,000+ active dust members 41 is not that many people. Actually, only about 3,000 ... http://eve-offline.net/?server=dust s...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 17:22:00
|
318. The War for Corp battles: UPDATE - in General Discussions [original thread]
843-BANE wrote: Jake Bloodworth wrote: I seriously doubt corp battles will be reintroduced with PC in its current state. If you want real competition, PC is where CCP wants you. Corp battles would make PC and the current district locking les...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 16:27:00
|
319. The War for Corp battles: UPDATE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: Considering there are 15,000+ active dust members 41 is not that many people. Actually, only about 3,000 ... http://eve-offline.net/?server=dust
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 16:21:00
|
320. CTF - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: the rules and reasoning would have to make sense for war? A 'flag' would not simply determine who has the territory after the dust settles. The OP mentioned a data disk, sensitive object, sabotage, intel, etc. Come ...
- by Varjac Theobroma Montenegro - at 2014.01.29 16:17:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |