| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
18061. 8 tanks in a battle fields.. one full squad of proto Avers... No tank died...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Gunner sclor wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: You guys are an embarrassment to AVers everywhere. I've happily eaten multiple tanks in single mathes with my Ishy. It's irritating, and not viable ISK-wise, consideri...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 03:23:00
|
18062. 8 tanks in a battle fields.. one full squad of proto Avers... No tank died...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
burning powers wrote: this **** is so dumb, imma run my explosive LAVs from here on out because thats the only way to destroy tanks anymore... We had 2 assault Forge guns and 4 Prototype Swarm launchers and couldnt kill anyone of those tanks......
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 03:08:00
|
18063. Just get rid of Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
burning powers wrote: This is so broken now. Much like the life of every tanker out there who defend this pile of sh it Oh no my life is broken because of a video game.......as if I didn't have more problems to deal with...... Defends his p...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 03:07:00
|
18064. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still ...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:58:00
|
18065. Anyone else get cheated out of skill points because of CCP's faulty dev blog? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: But let me ask you True, how would you have written the descriptions? Yus this is question I have been waiting for. Caldari "The Caldari State, a nation formed on the ideal of meritocracy, honour, community, and sel...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:56:00
|
18066. Tank 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:42:00
|
18067. LP payout method is BS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: I am actually enjoying the noncompetitive style of play in factional warfare. It means that I can focus on what needs to be done to win the match, not what I need to do to get number one on the scoreboard, so I can get payed...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:36:00
|
18068. 1.7 Respec Feedback - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: That's a whole lot of crying that can be summarized in "QQ it's just not fair! I want respec because I messed up my skills and it's CCP's fault" I don't know if I have messed up my skills and I wont until the ******* A...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:29:00
|
18069. Dev Invasions are coming! - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Frame wrote: It looks like Dev is on today's menu, mercs! Keep an eye out for "Other Contracts" in your Battle Finder - first set of contracts will show up in about 40 minutes. Let the Dev Invasion begin! Will you be covering multipl...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:25:00
|
18070. LP payout method is BS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Indeed since with relative ease even during a Minmatar push I can still run Missions and complexes with out having to even fight an enemy ship.....
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:22:00
|
18071. Limit Havs deployed to 1 per side - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: True Adamance wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: can anyone give me a reason why? I still haven't heard any argument at all, let alone a sound one. Why should you limit a very enjoyable playstyle to one person a ma...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:19:00
|
18072. Anyone else get cheated out of skill points because of CCP's faulty dev blog? - in General Discussions [original thread]
In the end I attribute my issue with FW not down to skilled players vs non skilled players, I attribute it to CCP doing a **** poor job introducing the racial groups of New Eden. They fail to impress that there is not good or evil, no right or wr...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:16:00
|
18073. Limit Havs deployed to 1 per side - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: The issue is not the power of tanks. They are in a good place as it is. the issue is how many are getting deployed at once. I saw 12 tanks last battle. There were more people in tanks than running infantry. That's ridicu...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 01:37:00
|
18074. Limit Havs deployed to 1 per side - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: can anyone give me a reason why? I still haven't heard any argument at all, let alone a sound one. Why should you limit a very enjoyable playstyle to one person a match, you might as well make the HAV a respawning as...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 01:35:00
|
18075. the good/bad old days - in General Discussions [original thread]
I miss when FW was based on actual loyalty and not just farming racial content.
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 01:32:00
|
18076. Stranded (interactive version) - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Soulja Ghostface wrote: me jerks to the left then sharp to the right. the beast runs right past you slamming the door open from the impact the guards aware of your presence, calling for backup, and me being cornered. Me must think fast A) Tr...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 01:24:00
|
18077. FW is a downward spiral - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: A better solution would be the player market. That way people can properly fund their FW and people are incentivised to fight for the losing factions because their LP store items are worth more. Could you imagine ho...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 01:22:00
|
18078. Which is better in your opinion, standard RR or assault RR? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Demetrius Grenaline wrote: Why are people talking about range and charge up? They're the same for both weapons. No downside ti having scope then, but that's the point no visible benefits on the Assault variant as the iron sights just aren't ...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 01:11:00
|
18079. Which is better in your opinion, standard RR or assault RR? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Drake435 wrote: I've only used the prototype assault version of the RR but I see that many people use the standard variant over the assault. Why? More damage, relatively similar rof (sort of), no noticeable charge up, and scope.
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 01:07:00
|
18080. I've been doing a census - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: True Adamance wrote: You never need to retreat with a Sica, not to mention you can turn on a dime and don't have to be moving forwards or backwards to turn the tank. Sica should be the clear choice as Armour tanks ar...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 00:48:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |