| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
881. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Another wrong assumption. I've played PC and still do sometimes. But I am taking gbghg's suggestion. When you want to create a calm and reasonable suggestion, then we can talk. Until then, having fun spraying hot air. PC in a...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.13 00:05:00
|
882. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Exactly, because i had 4 snipers on me, and you were protected by your team. Because my Breach forge gun is so crappy that by the time the second shot is charged the enemy tank either fleed or is at full HP again. Of c...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.13 00:04:00
|
883. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: If you cannot go 20/0 or better in a PC with a tank its not the tankers fault but the team you are playing with for not taking out the enemy (plus Avers) with the advantage of having a tank. And even if you cannot reach...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 23:58:00
|
884. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: You aren't doing work (not that HAV pilots ever have). Tanks require no teamwork whatsoever. I've been using tanks for over half a year. And I can truly say, Tankers do not require teamwork, nor want to require teamwork to be succ...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 23:50:00
|
885. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
SgtDoughnut wrote: and now hes trying to pull RL bs on people to validate his point, Lemme guess you were some kind of marine meat head, or some high ranking dude in the army. I highly doubt that I know quite a few people who have served and...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 23:39:00
|
886. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: If you got easily soloed by AV back in 1.6, then you were doing it wrong. Get better. Okay. Tell me what teamwork does a tank require. I went into a few matches yesterday and pulled out scores of 30/0 while I was a blueberry. How...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 23:22:00
|
887. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
SgtDoughnut wrote: Gotta love the guys who need a giant metal crutch to play a game and anything at all that can even hurt them turns eveyone who uses them into mouth breathers. If you were half as manly as you are pretending to be, you w...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 23:14:00
|
888. Tank cost vs Infantry cost - in General Discussions [original thread]
Our Deepest Regret wrote: I'm jealous. I only had enough for one, so I picked shield/missiles. Lucky for me, Armor blasters are still insanely popular. I had Vayus to level 4, and Falchions to level 3. You know you are a real tanker when...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 23:06:00
|
889. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Cosgar wrote: Why not work with vehicles. All this drama splits our community apart. Why would anyone work with vehicles? They currently require no teamwork, and when used solo can provide the same performance as a full squad...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 23:04:00
|
890. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
SgtDoughnut wrote: Sounds like we are back to chrome days, whoever has the most tanks wins, yay for whiny useless bastards who can only do anything with about 3 feet of steel between them and the guy with a gun bringing back their power houses....
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 23:02:00
|
891. Tank cost vs Infantry cost - in General Discussions [original thread]
BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote: only had 11 mil sp to use. so yea. working on rails. then shields next. i dunno. XD Yeah, I maxed all my cores, got all proto turrets, and still had enough SP left to get them all to at least prof 3 and fitting o...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 23:00:00
|
892. Tank cost vs Infantry cost - in General Discussions [original thread]
Long Evity wrote: So, from what I'm understanding, it's the LP store that's helping Tanks cost the amount a suit is worth. Then suits can do the same and reduce there costs too. Seems the argument, "Tanks cost about a suit." is mostly invali...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 22:58:00
|
893. Tank cost vs Infantry cost - in General Discussions [original thread]
BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote: The Attorney General wrote: Proper fits run up to 490k, but you can reduce that. do u run armor or shield tanks? Got them both maxed out brah. You can't have only one.
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 22:56:00
|
894. Tank cost vs Infantry cost - in General Discussions [original thread]
Proper fits run up to 490k, but you can reduce that.
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 22:49:00
|
895. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote: meh. av was easy mode before. sit on a hill kill tank in seconds. lose millions of isk to a cheap ass suit. i guess it's the tanks turn to be a bit OP. :D Never forget, that swarms were never OP to Atiim, and th...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 22:47:00
|
896. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: LOLWhat? What makes a tank so difficult? And no, everyone didn't spec into tanks because not everyone wants to sit inside an easy mode steel box all day. Tanking in 1.6 was difficult. Because of OP AV. But you would never ad...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 22:44:00
|
897. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chunky Munkey wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: No, its meant to repel them. Tanks are supposed to be able to withstand the punishment to a degree. Hence the term tank. If they could not perfor...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 22:35:00
|
898. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Justin Tymes wrote: Oh I'm sure new and intermediate players are doing sucking it up. By deleting Dust, and playing the many MMOs for free on the PS4 and PC that are more balanced than this game. So? Are you going with them? Tanking is n...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 22:32:00
|
899. Teamwork For One, And Teamwork For All. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Why not just make piloting an HAV require teamwork? I mean AV currently requires teamwork right? Why not? AV does not require teamwork. Solo AV work requires two things: Patience Intelligence This pretty much excludes eve...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 22:14:00
|
900. 375 HP/s with 3x Large Militia Armor reps - in General Discussions [original thread]
Luk Manag wrote: Good point about the skill requirement. The PLC has a 10% weakness vs armor and the re-fire rate is a bit laughable atm - if it did more direct damage or had a multi-shot clip it might be a good option. My best AV fit now is ...
- by The Attorney General - at 2013.12.12 21:20:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |