| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
721. Shield boosters - Tanks - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Honestly I think the intention was to simply inject x-HP and start the regen at the same time. Obviously it's not working quite that way. What if at least on the backend it was changed to For Duration (1 second) of boost...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.03.01 19:11:00
|
722. Shield boosters - Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Reign Omega wrote: The point of the exercise is that they don't work as advertised, whether intended or not the description should be updated to reflect the actual operations, or vice versa. This was my intention. Let me just throw out the ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.03.01 18:58:00
|
723. Shield boosters - Tanks - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So I've been playing with a new shield booster fit and have come to the same conclusion I had before. That they don't work the way you expect them to work. I have noticed some talk from people claiming that perhaps you are taking so much damage t...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.03.01 01:09:00
|
724. Shield boosters - Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Proto Annihilator wrote: Double harden and use a light booster. Get back to me with your results. My experiences were with a double hardened gunnlogi and a heavy booster. I imagine a light booster follows the same principal.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.03.01 01:08:00
|
725. Shield boosters - Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
So I've been playing with a new shield booster fit and have come to the same conclusion I had before. That they don't work the way you expect them to work. I have noticed some talk from people claiming that perhaps you are taking so much damage t...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.03.01 00:59:00
|
726. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Only spkr would argue that it's unfair for proto AV to smash a militia tank. But at least over the last two years he's consistent! I did the smashing. I've been smashed in return. The national corp...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.27 19:06:00
|
727. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: The correct answer is bringing armor up to the level shield is at, not nerfing shield to the point where the differences are back to Chrome/Uprising levdls. That's exactly what I said, and by taking one look at proto fit...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.27 19:00:00
|
728. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: You are correct, spreadsheets assume spherical mercs in a vacuum, and thus aren't going to ever be where final balance is struck. But they are a great starting point to hammer into a correct shape through testing...an...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.27 18:38:00
|
729. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Only spkr would argue that it's unfair for proto AV to smash a militia tank. But at least over the last two years he's consistent! I would like 100 times if I could!
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.27 18:38:00
|
730. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: As is yours. That was kinda the point. And you just admitted to it. But seriously, what is wrong with you guys. Seriously, swarms OP? If anything it shows a disparity with armor which IS acknowledge a...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.27 17:38:00
|
731. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: You buff AV then you kill the LAV You buff AV you kill the DS You buff AV you kill the ADS You buff AV you kill the DHAV Any whi...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.27 16:51:00
|
732. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: You buff AV then you kill the LAV You buff AV you kill the DS You buff AV you kill the ADS You buff AV you kill the DHAV Any which way you buff AV you kill something else...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.27 16:31:00
|
733. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: [quote=True Adamance] I mean I know FW can be competitive, but there is nothing like a 16 vs 16 fully prepped and ALWAYS proto team. It was like that at one point. But just like your PC crowd you ki...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.27 00:47:00
|
734. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Tebu been using 3 man HAV's since the competitive days of FW where it was 16 corpmates vs the 8-10 guys PIE could field. It is inordinately successful with good co-ordination. I don't pretend to know about PC but with two ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.27 00:08:00
|
735. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: On a more constructive note, before we pass judgement on the DHAV/UHAV let's see how it plays. Rattati said outright that he wants to put in a module to improve blaster dispersion for the UHAV that MBTs can use as well. W...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.26 23:54:00
|
736. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Let me just pick out a few things that I want to explore further. Breakin stuff wrote: DHAVs are supposed to be glass cannons, so yes. I'm also of the opinion that said glass cannons should be cheaper than MBT and UHAVs because of their inten...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.26 23:35:00
|
737. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: no passive resists unless by module. Ummm, duh? I'm sorry, when I say passive resists I mean like we had pre 1.6. Sorry I'm a long time tanker and forget...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.26 22:16:00
|
738. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: no passive resists unless by module. Ummm, duh? I'm sorry, when I say passive resists I mean like we had pre 1.6. Sorry I'm a long time tanker and forget to clarify, I simply as...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.26 22:14:00
|
739. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: no passive resists unless by module. Ummm, duh? I'm sorry, when I say passive resists I mean like we had pre 1.6. Sorry I'm a long time tanker and forget to clarify, I simply assume everyone knows what I mean:) Of course...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.26 21:30:00
|
740. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: In regards to the above post I noted you said something that is very insightful. Tebu Gan wrote: I basically took my current 3 slot layout on my high slot modules I use currently and built out from there. Keep in mind...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.02.26 21:26:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |