| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
201. Stacking penalty halp - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mejt0 wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Mejt0 wrote: Calculator Individual bonuses: -40.00%, -34.76%, -22.82%, Total bonus: -69.79% How did you come up with that Total bonus by chance? It is from website I posted. My way to get this number is...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.25 02:23:00
|
202. Stacking penalty halp - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mejt0 wrote: Calculator Individual bonuses: -40.00%, -34.76%, -22.82%, Total bonus: -69.79% How did you come up with that Total bonus by chance?
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.25 01:07:00
|
203. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Did a few comparisons with current fits simulating a 3 hard 1 rep, and 2 hard, 1 rep, 1 plate (the current PC tank meta). threw in a 2 plate, 1 rep, 1 hard fit for lolz and it's insanely underpowered in comparison. The fit I assume is attacking is...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.25 00:54:00
|
204. Stacking penalty halp - in General Discussions [original thread]
Meh, I think I'm just over thinking it. I'm just going to assume a 100, 87, 57 progression and go from there.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.24 20:16:00
|
205. Stacking penalty halp - in General Discussions [original thread]
So plugging values into a stacking penalty calculator, I get my 3 numbers, 40, 34, 22. So a cumulative bonus of 97%? Using the actual formula though gives me 100% 56% 11%, which while seemingly more reasonable, at 40, 22, 4, doesn't match up with ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.24 20:07:00
|
206. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Megaman Trigger wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Just spit balling an idea here. What if forge guns (or a variant) did damage based on the amount of charge. Meaning it could be fired early for much less damage. Might be somethi...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.22 17:01:00
|
207. What should I work on next? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Did anyone mention dropships. They need the same love tanks were given. Plus one slot, STD, ADV, PRO.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.22 16:04:00
|
208. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just spit balling an idea here. What if forge guns (or a variant) did damage based on the amount of charge. Meaning it could be fired early for much less damage. Might be something good for infantry sniping.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.22 15:27:00
|
209. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: so if we propose to rattati to mid-line the Heavy guns, then bonus them by hull type we should be good. For instance, a DHAV would be the zero-splash, high dispersion, intended to murder tanks not footscrubs, but the UHAV ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.20 20:20:00
|
210. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: actually now that I think about it, the determination whether a turret is AV/AI could be determined by the theoretical new tank chassis, the UHAVs and DHAVs Through role bonuse...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.20 19:18:00
|
211. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: actually now that I think about it, the determination whether a turret is AV/AI could be determined by the theoretical new tank chassis, the UHAVs and DHAVs Through role bonuses eh. I was thinking doing a bonus to a spe...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.20 17:22:00
|
212. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: I don't think that there are any easy fixes. Honestly we'd need to know more of rattati's intent for vehicles ultimately. Agreed.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.20 17:15:00
|
213. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: I disagree. Anti vehicle weapons are anti-vehicle weapons. I feel that heavy weapons need to be dual purpose rather than ungodly and unreasonably more powerful. The same applies to turrets. Making heavy turrets gimped agai...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.20 15:50:00
|
214. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: I would actually focus on how to make vehicle turrets more incrementally lethal, and the vehicles less costly to go with the proposal. The dispersion on the blaster turrets is highly likely to cause problems if tanks lose ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.20 15:23:00
|
215. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: I actually agree with Tebu Gan on this one, specifically because he also specified "with just the main weapon". I think that Swarm, Plasma Cannon, and AHMG users should be able to solo a tank, but only if they also have AV G...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.20 14:55:00
|
216. A Message From NF... (AE Migration) - in General Discussions [original thread]
lolz
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.20 02:51:00
|
217. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Did I mention I'm in favor of the turret lethality climbing some to match the lessening of defenses? Something something tank cannons being effective. This would be an acceptable trade off. Although, I feel often times...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.19 23:52:00
|
218. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: And reverting the shield changes and a buncha other crap. The fulcrum point is balancing AV weapons to Vehicles is balance by intended time to kill. The suggestions for this balance method and the suggestions for benchma...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.19 22:21:00
|
219. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: TL;DR it for me please.... what is the more central axis of balance based around. Only allowing one hardener per fit, buffing forge gun with faster ROF (which I think is a solid idea). Reducing hardener to 30%.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.19 21:00:00
|
220. For peer review: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cross Atu wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: With hardener cycles up, a single tanks should not be solo'ed (with just the main weapon) by one infantry. Your proposal, while not fully pushing it to that point, would bring it ver...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2015.08.19 20:29:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |