| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Not to mention there is no cap on damage mods Should'nt even be a cap on damage mods I dont have a cap on damage mods on any of my suits Do you guys always forget to ...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.23 15:05:00
|
162. The DHAV - Why? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Lets just see how it plays out. Let's not jump to conclusions. I already saw how it played out with Enforcers and the result was that mainly it was a useless tank which could be beaten by the basic HAVs. I don't feel that...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.23 14:22:00
|
163. So I may have trolled the general discussion forum... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
If swarms are made to require skill which generally means aim then the only way i can see it is that for the missiles to hit then they have to keep the lock on and if the target goes behind cover and you lose lock that is it and the missiles blow ...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.23 14:08:00
|
164. So I may have trolled the general discussion forum... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TheEnd762 wrote: Night 5talker 514 wrote: So... ...how would you add more skill into using swarms? I wouldn't. You can absolutely solo vehicles in real life, easier than you can in Dust, actually. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FGM-148_J...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.23 14:06:00
|
165. Pilot Suits: I Give In - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Is a Pilot suit worth 2.7mil just so i can get into a vehicle? No It should be worthwhile to use, offer a decent bonus. Vehicles are supposed to be a playstyle in itself but currently it is not, anything a vehicle can do infantry can do better ...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.23 14:03:00
|
166. The DHAV - Why? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So as far as i can tell the new DHAV is basically an Enforcer of old which did not work then and i think it will not work now. It is supposed to be a hard counter to the UHAV and deal a vast amount of damage in a short space of time but its down...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.23 13:59:00
|
167. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Not to mention there is no cap on damage mods Should'nt even be a cap on damage mods I dont have a cap on damage mods on any of my suits
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.23 13:23:00
|
168. Clarification for ADS acting as a Gunship - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
ADS can barely do anything these days. It is not like a normal DS so transporting players is out of the question since landing at any speed can kill it unless you are armor and for it to be a gunship it needs to be able to deliver high damage to...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.23 11:24:00
|
169. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Uhg 1 hardener limitation....I hate heavy handed stuff like that....oh well, time to get to work and break things. Well, we can also make them worse or...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.23 11:12:00
|
170. Large Blaster Turret Proposition - Re-designation of Role - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
When you add splash to something it means you dont have to aim as much since damage is caused either way Also your propsal also misses that if a plasma cannon round can have a 3.5m radius and cause enough splash to kill a scout then the Large Mi...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.23 11:03:00
|
171. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: You want a PG module to give you x% more PG for a tradeoff of something like -% CPU? Well that is an option I suppose but that's not what I was saying. Like....just as an example, Rattati is...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.20 19:03:00
|
172. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Well Im not defending the choice, but I imagine his train of thought is he was trying to avoid shield vehicles from having too many resources by always using their lows for ...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.20 18:44:00
|
173. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Well Im not defending the choice, but I imagine his train of thought is he was trying to avoid shield vehicles from having too many resources by always using their lows for that purpose. If anything if he goes this route, ...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.20 18:20:00
|
174. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: 5. Thanks for breaking quite a few vehicle fits but this is also another bad idea and i shall explain why. PG/CPU modules are there to add variety to fits or to squeeze a bit more juice out so ...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.20 18:07:00
|
175. 'Templar' Commando A-I 'Templar' Scout A-I - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I do think that a full Templar set should be released Quafe has a full set of everything and all weapons but im not going to pay any extra for it, i feel that these are missing items which should be added to the set
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.20 15:52:00
|
176. The Fitting Mod Issue - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
What is wrong with you? What is wrong with the way it is now? Can't help it that the Gunlogi has nothing intresting to put in the low slots because everything which was intresting got removed Do the infantry PG//CPU modules cost an excessive ...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.20 14:46:00
|
177. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
A) All the Gallente HAV needed was more CPU. C) I thought this was supposed to be a sandbox? D) They were in Chrome and espc in Uprising - It helps when i can hit what i am aiming at and not having dispersion send my shots out at 30deg angles w...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.02.20 12:07:00
|
178. Vehicles in Echo. [If you go that far] - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: CCP rebalance proto AV to deal with proto vehicles Tho unless we get the mods back from 1.0 and more skills with bonuses the proto vehicles wil...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2014.08.22 15:28:00
|
179. Vehicles in Echo. [If you go that far] - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: CCP rebalance proto AV to deal with proto vehicles Tho unless we get the mods back from 1.0 and more skills with bonuses the proto vehicles will be a bit meh really CCP has yet to rebalance p...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2014.08.22 14:27:00
|
180. Vehicles in Echo. [If you go that far] - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Atiim wrote: Shooter Somewhere wrote: First suggestion-is bring back standard hauls. Now people claimed this was over powered and it forced them to spec into tanks of there own just to comba...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2014.08.22 13:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |