| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
221. please dont increase militia tank price - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Tailss Prower wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: Soldiersaint wrote: I agree tanks are a lot of fun right now. Any one asking for a price raise on militia tanks are just jerks who think games should be a second job. ...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.30 07:06:00
|
222. please dont increase militia tank price - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Soldiersaint wrote: I agree tanks are a lot of fun right now. Any one asking for a price raise on militia tanks are just jerks who think games should be a second job. I am a tanker who doesn't think that 80k mlt tank...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.30 06:06:00
|
223. please dont increase militia tank price - in General Discussions [original thread]
straya fox wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Tech De Ra wrote: When a tank costs almost the same as an adv fit dropsuit and can be RECALLED during the match when you feel like it, something is wrong /thread When a dropsuit costs almost...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.30 05:50:00
|
224. Are Tankers enjoying tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Not really enjoying tanks right now - the overhaul of modules and regen/reps is great except for the fact that 'tank vs tank' mostly comes down to who sees the other first and lands two 3000+ dmg railgun shots. There's al...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.30 05:48:00
|
225. please dont increase militia tank price - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech De Ra wrote: When a tank costs almost the same as an adv fit dropsuit and can be RECALLED during the match when you feel like it, something is wrong /thread Samething can be said about the advanced dropsuit because you can change to a ...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.30 05:19:00
|
226. please dont increase militia tank price - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Tech De Ra wrote: even without hardeners the militia tanks dont seem to care about swarms my first time in a tank for a long time was last night when gimble called in a sica fitted with bpo mods, the enemy had 2 s...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.30 03:55:00
|
227. Are Tankers enjoying tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I always use the railgun and target vehicles but don't worry i still mop the floor with you infantry
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.29 09:28:00
|
228. please dont increase militia tank price - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Soldiersaint wrote: Jack McReady wrote: Mdog 24158 wrote: I love the fact that tanks can be called in easily and be super fun. Dont increase the price just give them lower pg or cpu or lower their base ehp. More vehicles w...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.29 06:58:00
|
229. Just realized railgun turrets are automatic -_- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ronan Elsword wrote: That actually sounds like a good idea for balancing Railguns. That would actually break railguns but if you wanted to balance it which i think it is fine would be to lower clip size and/or make it overheat faster
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.29 06:52:00
|
230. Railgun vs Blaster turret - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: Railgun is primarily anti-tank, with minimal anti-infantry capability thanks to the difficulty of hitting a small moving target. Blaster is primarily anti-infantry, but still viable for hurti...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.28 22:42:00
|
231. Railgun vs Blaster turret - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: RAILGUN DAMAGE:1885 INTERVAL:1.4s DPS:1346 RANGE: UNLIMITED BLASTER DAMAGE: 136.5 INTERVAL:0.14s DPS:975 RANGE: SHORT When it comes to tank busting the Blaster is severely underpowered. Unfortunately peo...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.28 14:01:00
|
232. Railgun vs Blaster turret - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: Railgun is primarily anti-tank, with minimal anti-infantry capability thanks to the difficulty of hitting a small moving target. Blaster is primarily anti-infantry, but still viable for hurting vehicles, even if it's li...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.28 13:49:00
|
233. Railgun vs Blaster turret - in General Discussions [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Tailss Prower wrote: It used to be the killer of shield vehicles but was used on infantry so much that maybe thats what ccp intended and while yes the railgun is powerful it was mainly designed as a anti-vehicle weapon and i...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.28 13:46:00
|
234. Railgun vs Blaster turret - in General Discussions [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Spectral Clone wrote: Its supposed to run up behind shield tanks and rip them apart before the rail turret can be turned 180 degrees. Tip: Shoot at the small box at the back of the Sica or Gunnlogi. If used on a gunnlogi...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.28 13:43:00
|
235. Railgun vs Blaster turret - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: Its supposed to run up behind shield tanks and rip them apart before the rail turret can be turned 180 degrees. Tip: Shoot at the small box at the back of the Sica or Gunnlogi. Not really i mean i understand what you me...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.28 13:41:00
|
236. Railgun vs Blaster turret - in General Discussions [original thread]
It used to be the killer of shield vehicles but was used on infantry so much that maybe thats what ccp intended and while yes the railgun is powerful it was mainly designed as a anti-vehicle weapon and is only really good for that. I mean you can...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2014.01.28 13:36:00
|
237. To CCP- the player divide. - in General Discussions [original thread]
CHIPMINT BUTTERCUP wrote: They just need to move this game over to the PC and give up on the PS3. Trust me the PC people wouldn't play it any more than we do because the problem is CCP and their lack of motivation and not so much the PS3
- by Tailss Prower - at 2013.11.07 15:24:00
|
238. [RANDOM FORUM THREAD] So how many people in Dust514 are Ex-MAG players? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sadly by the time I found out about MAG it was already kinda dead but I wish I could have played it back when it was active
- by Tailss Prower - at 2013.11.07 05:18:00
|
239. It's Time We Take Charge, For The Sake Of This Game. Prevent TANK 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: Tailss Prower wrote: Atiim wrote: DISCLAIMER: This thread is not about tanks. (Apparently some ppl can't be bothered to read the OP ) Ok I put Tank 514 in the title to get more people to read this thread, but thei...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2013.10.29 13:46:00
|
240. How long have you been here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eris Ernaga wrote: Back then you could only play on 1 map and skirmish was a little bit different I think they only had skirmish and ambush matches then as well not even faction warfare. They didn't even have corporations back then. we didn't...
- by Tailss Prower - at 2013.10.29 05:49:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |