| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
1081. AV users do want a 50% damage nerf to all AV weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
robin williams' ghost wrote: Buwaro Draemon wrote: [quote=robin williams' ghost][quote=Buwaro You are not seeing my point. You are crying that you don't want tanks to be better on the field because they can go 30-0 when we have infantry d...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 18:12:00
|
1082. AV users do want a 50% damage nerf to all AV weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: ''AV users do want a 50% damage nerf to all AV weapons '' No we dont. Coming from an ex-PRO forge gunner, yes I do.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 18:08:00
|
1083. AV users do want a 50% damage nerf to all AV weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
robin williams' ghost wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Okay, to be fair, Swarms need a nerfbat ******* BAD. They require the least skill of any weapon in this game, and are the most dangerous. If this game had ANY logic to it's design, Plasma C...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 18:00:00
|
1084. AV users do want a 50% damage nerf to all AV weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mad Syringe wrote: We had that already, when this game was called tank 514... nobody liked it, so it was dumped. -1 bad troll... The game was never Tank 514. That was fearmongering by infantry to get CCP to nerf vehicles again.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 17:57:00
|
1085. AV users do want a 50% damage nerf to all AV weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
robin williams' ghost wrote: No AV players do not want this. You want this so you can troll around in your death fortress and go 30/0 every match. Let's be honest here. He has PRO forge. He has every right to say that.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 17:56:00
|
1086. AV users do want a 50% damage nerf to all AV weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
As an ex-forge gunner, both Chromosome and later in Uprising, I agree.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 17:47:00
|
1087. Vehicles users don't want Pilot suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: So by your metric then, you're not even a tanker Spkr, you shouldn't have a say - go run around playing your ground game while the big boys talk, If you were a real pilot you'd have more sp in vehicles than in infantry....
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 05:33:00
|
1088. Proposition: HAV vehicle limit. - in General Discussions [original thread]
TIGER SHARK1501 wrote: The Noob Destroyer wrote: One problem with HAV's is that once they are strong,, people abuse them and we see tank spam... which completely ruins it for everyone else. Yes I believe HAV should be powerful and it should ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 05:09:00
|
1089. Proposition: HAV vehicle limit. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Juno Tristan wrote: Such a terrible idea... Should we limit the team to 1 proto suit? 1 heavy? If tanks are being geared towards AV and there is no V, then what's the point? We should limit both teams to 3 PRO suits in all pubs. Answeri...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 02:52:00
|
1090. Vehicles users don't want Pilot suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: "THEY'RE NOT VEHICLE USERS UNLESS I SAY THEY'RE VEHICLE USERS!". He's not a pilot. Are you an aspergers spectrum by chance spkr? because the stomping the feet, screaming, tantrums and stubbornness is the type of beha...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 02:37:00
|
1091. Vehicles users don't want Pilot suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Okay, you've got me really confused here. Which side of this argument are you on? Are you just going after the OP for "infantry dictating vehicle design" or are you actually advocating pilot suits...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 01:53:00
|
1092. Vehicles users don't want Pilot suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Of course, because I won't play along to get along. No, because you're a judgemental ******* who spouts off without knowing anything about people ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 01:51:00
|
1093. Vehicles users don't want Pilot suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Of course, because I won't play along to get along. No, because you're a judgemental ******* who spouts off without knowing anything about people in question (aka 'you're not a tanker'... to pe...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 01:18:00
|
1094. Vehicles users don't want Pilot suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: Do me a favor Spkr, google FPS. Actually, there . Where does it talk about Vehicles there? (Might be an idea to be thankful for their inclusion rather than view it as an entitlement) Because "FPS" means "no vehicles all...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 01:13:00
|
1095. Vehicles users don't want Pilot suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
Duke Noobiam wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: incoherent drooling I'm not the one trying to ruin the game for a small subsection of the community/playerbase. You are. Who the hell are you to say pilots don't want the pi...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.07 00:58:00
|
1096. Vehicles users don't want Pilot suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: I'm incredibly hesitant towards the role of a pilot suit, as similar to current design, either it says "**** you, you need to dump more sp in this role" or it's functionally useless, which I believe is something that's in...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.06 23:53:00
|
1097. Vehicles users don't want Pilot suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kierkegaard Soren wrote: What if pilot suits enhanced specific aspects of vehicle play but gave drawbacks to others? So that donning a pilot suit allows you to specialise your vehicle towards a certain playstyle at the expense of making it weak...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.06 23:51:00
|
1098. Proposition: HAV vehicle limit. - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Noob Destroyer wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The Noob Destroyer wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Limit all vehicles then this would be considered . You can't just single out one form , that's no...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.06 23:33:00
|
1099. Proposition: HAV vehicle limit. - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Noob Destroyer wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The Noob Destroyer wrote: Racro 01 Arifistan wrote: ok.................so then we have douche bags dropping mlt tanks in the redline and sitting there all match. and the fully skilled/spece...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.06 23:32:00
|
1100. Proposition: HAV vehicle limit. - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Noob Destroyer wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Limit all vehicles then this would be considered . You can't just single out one form , that's not balance more then bias . Go find another game if...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.06 23:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |