| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
861. Swarm chase for too much - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer XCIV wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: They already explode after 300m, iirc. So, what's the complaint again? 400m Still. Point stands. 400m is within the ranges he suggested, and is in fact perfectly situated in t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.18 19:05:00
|
862. Swarm chase for too much - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer XCIV wrote: They already explode after 300m, iirc. So, what's the complaint again? 400m
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.18 18:40:00
|
863. An important first step in vehicle balance - turn back the clock - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bootless and Unhorsed wrote: The process of balancing vehicles inevitably derails due to 2 complaints from pilots: 1. I have invested a ton of extra SP into vehicles, I should be more effective than infantry 2. I have invested a ton of extra IS...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.18 17:58:00
|
864. An important first step in vehicle balance - turn back the clock - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bootless and Unhorsed wrote: Did you really enjoy the investment in ISK and SP or just the huge advantage that gave you over everyone else on the battlefield? Do you enjoy piloting vehicles or just having a big advantage over infantry? Vehicl...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.18 17:51:00
|
865. Mobile CRU tankin - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Drecain Midular wrote: I wish they would fix the bug where you cant spawn on a veichle mCRU if your clone has not bled out... Seriously. If you die and your clone can call for pickup, spawning on a normal CRU installation...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.18 17:41:00
|
866. Mobile CRU tankin - in General Discussions [original thread]
People in vehicles using teamwork is OP, nerf teamwork.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.18 09:00:00
|
867. AV Players - in General Discussions [original thread]
How we look at infantry when they're pounding us with AV.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.18 02:56:00
|
868. Scout MKO survival fitting - in General Discussions [original thread]
3 heavies? Just run away
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.18 02:55:00
|
869. HAV revamp proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: I have no issue with escaping to recover. Vehicles should not easily recover in less time than it takes an AV Gunner to travel to a supply depot, repair and reload. Cover is OP, nerf cover.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.17 21:33:00
|
870. HAV revamp proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
shaman oga wrote: Shield Booster : the main problem with it, is that is only reliable if you are not uder attack, unlinke armor rep, shield is blocked by incoming fire, i have yet to find a balanced solution. The only thing i've thought is t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.17 21:32:00
|
871. HAV revamp proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Any chance you would be in favor of adding shield regen to the extenders (not a whole lot, just divide the hp by the regen time on the base hulls) just enough to maintain a shield recharge time, to provide a resemblance...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.17 21:29:00
|
872. HAV revamp proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: I'm probably going to nerfhammer the plates because the difference between 120mm and 180mm is more than a 2x multiplier, which accounts for the Surya's Ungodly ability to soak fire. I've said before, the idiot-proof auto-...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.17 21:27:00
|
873. HAV revamp proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: dont you think this effort is futile without racial parity in terms of AV options? No
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.17 21:25:00
|
874. HAV revamp proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: There was also the problem where MLT and STD swarms where so much worse than their older brothers that even when people picked them up, it couldn't do anything even against unskilled failfits (That problem has largely ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.17 21:24:00
|
875. HAV revamp proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Surya. I'm well aware of how obnoxious the Surya was. Like I said, if I have my way that HAV's ability to soak fire is going to be dropped back near the sagaris into manageable. How many times do pilots have to say "Rat...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.17 21:22:00
|
876. HAV revamp proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Part of the problem in Chrome was there was a cultural inertia where everyone REFUSED to load swarms or forges. "refused" is the wrong word. I remember it like it was yesterday when I had my trip...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.17 21:21:00
|
877. HAV revamp proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Maddies were dealable. That's because the idiot-proof auto-aim AV had a bonus against armor. Honesty the concern point I have is the Surya. An improved tank over the standard tank is OP, nerf the improved tank. Oh wa...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.17 21:20:00
|
878. HAV revamp proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: And Infantry still hated it, because you would get that 1 guy (Spkr, Taki) who decided that enemy tanks weren't enough, so they went round going 20+ every match because no-one could stop them. Our aim was OP, nerf the abilit...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.17 21:15:00
|
879. HAV revamp proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: before skills wiyrkomi swarm is 430 DPS if you include base reloads. All 4 missiles hitting in half a second is not 430. this is before skills and damage mods. See above Ishukone assault forge damage before anything...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.17 21:03:00
|
880. HAV revamp proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Spkr why do you bother talking when you know I think your attitude is toxic to the game. You consider my attitude toxic because I refuse to back down on the defense of vehicles, because I want that to be my chosen role, w...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.17 20:59:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |