| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
5361. Vehicle Recalling in mid combat - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zero Harpuia wrote: Lurchasaurus wrote: Zero Harpuia wrote: Lurchasaurus wrote: double standard. infantry hotswaps at supply depots. Double Standard. Infantry need a supply depot. If tanks needed one, I'd be fine with losing the ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 21:14:00
|
5362. Make up your minds people!..! CCP, sticky this - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scrub known for lagging telling someone to aim better. lrn2internet
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 20:00:00
|
5363. Cal Logi 588 Shields & 436 Armor - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kira Lannister wrote: Was messing around on my alt, all my skills aren't even up, and I got my Cal Logi to 588 Shields & 436 Armor with a duvolle. Dual tank ftw or wtf. >:] Better off with regulators. Why slow it down?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 19:59:00
|
5364. Tanks vs. AV: A constructive discussion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Toby Flenderson wrote: When I see a tank I realize that it has the potential to control the rest of a match if gone unchallenged. I make it my mission to try and destroy it even if it means taking 5...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 15:36:00
|
5365. Tanks vs. AV: A constructive discussion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: we do know that, they will be more powerful as result, thats what it says in the sticky vechiles in 1.5 and beyond. Don't believe what the stickies tell you. They also claim t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 15:35:00
|
5366. Tanks vs. AV: A constructive discussion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: You are full of **** u mad? You're basically admitting you're lying with that.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 15:32:00
|
5367. Tanks vs. AV: A constructive discussion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: yesterday I met a Soma right after 1.4 patch and it took me 6 proto swarm shots to solo him. his fit was obviously great but his driving was still terrible, he was standing still all day while I only jumped out of cover to ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 15:25:00
|
5368. Tanks vs. AV: A constructive discussion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Toby Flenderson wrote: When I see a tank I realize that it has the potential to control the rest of a match if gone unchallenged. I make it my mission to try and destroy it even if it means taking 5+ deaths. My militia SL and packed AV grenad...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 15:21:00
|
5369. Pros were right, MD WAS my crutch! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm over 3.0
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 15:12:00
|
5370. Announcement:Uprising 1.4 Known Issues - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yes
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 15:11:00
|
5371. A Scout snuck up on my Heavy.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Soiaire wrote: I instantly done a 180 and killed him with a very intimidating stare. True story. I killed a PRO heavy in the wee hours with my MLT shotgun on a MLT Minny scout. I don't think he was too happy about it.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 15:09:00
|
5372. basic FPS mechanics - aim, fire, hit - ccp why u no copy other games - in General Discussions [original thread]
Because...................... Dust shouldn't be Call of Duty: Space Edition?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 15:08:00
|
5373. I don't notice any aim assist at all. - in General Discussions [original thread]
*shrugs*
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 07:12:00
|
5374. S+Çt+Æpü½µêªpüúpüªpüäpüƒpüápüæpéïsÉîs+ùpü«sïƒT¢åpÇüµ¦éS¦¦pÇé - in General Discussions [original thread]
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... wut
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 06:00:00
|
5375. If you remove the aim assist!! Than Dust is Doomed for oblivion! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lurchasaurus wrote: COD does just this and has ruined a genre of gaming. If more would've followed the SOCOM mold instead of Call of Duty...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 05:34:00
|
5376. If you remove the aim assist!! Than Dust is Doomed for oblivion! - in General Discussions [original thread]
g4 status wrote: Lurchasaurus wrote: COD does just this and has ruined a genre of gaming. COD did this so do it too CCP so you can make alot of money and thrive as a game industry. Money talks. COD is the highest selling game in history, s...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 05:32:00
|
5377. Analysis of Swarm Launchers in 1.4 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rusty Shallows wrote: Quote: "Analysis of Swarm Launchers in 1.4" Didn't anyone noticed the ammo nerf on Swarm launchers? The ammo skill is practically required now. I had a guy notice a drop in rounds and then choke when he realized he a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 05:30:00
|
5378. Analysis of Swarm Launchers in 1.4 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kekklian Noobatronic wrote: In reality, there is literally no change in fire rate. If anything, it was nothing more than a nerf. After extensive use of Swarms today, there is still a built in cycle time. I'm launching them no faster than before...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 05:08:00
|
5379. Try switching video quality between high and medium. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Everything looks just as good on medium as it does on high. Don't really notice framerate issues, but I was having issues the last match I played a couple hours ago - that very long domo because the null cannon is covered by a pipe (okay CCP - who...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 03:45:00
|
5380. hit detection fixes! mostly :) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lurchasaurus wrote: omgwtfbacon. good news on the shotty front. good for you guys and well done CCP, this fire could have been a lot worse lol Yeah, imagine the rage if they screwed up ARs temporarily?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.04 03:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |