| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
3741. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: I haven't seen any "no respecs for tanks" threads, just people also asking for respecs when the new suits are introduced. I'm not asking for a respecs since I like Gallente suits an...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 22:11:00
|
3742. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: Tanks are pretty damn good man. They can already be pretty damn unkillable. The respect is because of the skill changes, not because ccp doesn't want you to use vehicles. Tanks are unkillable if you're camping in the redl...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 22:11:00
|
3743. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
HYENAKILLER X wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: They're scared to death at the prospect of intelligent, unkillable tanks. The half respec is CCP's way of saying "there you go, you have no SP into vehicles now, but everything else into infantry. Wh...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 22:10:00
|
3744. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dexter307 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Dexter307 wrote: Dont act like a jerk if you want to be taken seriously. Then infantry should stop saying "no full respec" without providing any reason at all why they're saying that. Because that's ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 22:09:00
|
3745. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: knight of 6 wrote: seriously? you do realize that CCP favors infantry right? and at the slightest provocation they will hit us with the nerf bat so hard we wont profit for builds. don't rub your vict...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 21:59:00
|
3746. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rei Shepard wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: They're scared to death at the prospect of intelligent, unkillable tanks. The half respec is CCP's way of saying "there you go, you have no SP into vehicles now, but everything else into infantry. Why ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 21:58:00
|
3747. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: They're scared to death at the prospect of intelligent, unkillable tanks. The half respec is CCP's way of saying "there you go, you have no SP into vehicles now, but everything else into infantry. Why n...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 21:55:00
|
3748. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Sol wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Dexter307 wrote: Dont act like a jerk if you want to be taken seriously. Then infantry should stop saying "no full respec" without providing any reason at all why they're saying that. Because that's...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 21:33:00
|
3749. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: I haven't seen any "no respecs for tanks" threads, just people also asking for respecs when the new suits are introduced. I'm not asking for a respecs since I like Gallente suits and vehicles and will spec as each one becomes...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 21:31:00
|
3750. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tch Tch wrote: Make tanks tougher. Better suspension or a slot for that. But once you use the sword you die by the sword. If you get WP from the tank (not uplink, ammo re-supply etc) that tank if your team is winning cannot: Stay in a red zon...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 21:08:00
|
3751. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
knight of 6 wrote: seriously? you do realize that CCP favors infantry right? and at the slightest provocation they will hit us with the nerf bat so hard we wont profit for builds. don't rub your victory in infantry's face, literally no good c...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 21:06:00
|
3752. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
wripple wrote: Don't get me wrong, I have litterally no skill points spent into the Swarms (I use the Dren BPO with complex damage mods) however I don't think that it is fair that vehicles will be getting a respec due to their changes, whereas ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 20:44:00
|
3753. Swarm Launcher Respec? - in General Discussions [original thread]
wripple wrote: Don't get me wrong, I have litterally no skill points spent into the Swarms (I use the Dren BPO with complex damage mods) however I don't think that it is fair that vehicles will be getting a respec due to their changes, whereas ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 20:43:00
|
3754. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dexter307 wrote: Dont act like a jerk if you want to be taken seriously. Then infantry should stop saying "no full respec" without providing any reason at all why they're saying that. Because that's what they do. "No full respec for tankers...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 20:36:00
|
3755. 20,000 YEARS IN THE FUTURE AND I CANT JUMP OVER A 1 FOOT FENCE - in General Discussions [original thread]
SILVERBACK 02 wrote: HMMM.... 20,000 years into the future and tanks don't have suspension and are damaged by the terrain they roll over.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 20:30:00
|
3756. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Why do you feel the need to antagonize and troll? Is being obnoxious really so rewarding? Because that's basically what it comes down to. This is no troll post. Everywhere I look, infantry wants a respec for racial g...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 20:22:00
|
3757. TANK combat. - in General Discussions [original thread]
CYRAX SERVIUS wrote: Took out two maddys this morning, yummy. Were they poorly fit and in a static position with no modules running?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 20:16:00
|
3758. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
They're scared to death at the prospect of intelligent, unkillable tanks. The half respec is CCP's way of saying "there you go, you have no SP into vehicles now, but everything else into infantry. Why not go infantry? It's cheaper." Infantry doe...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 20:14:00
|
3759. CPM Iron Wolf Saber - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Is being a douche again Why is this guy our CPM. This is no community representative that I want. He simply shuts out idea and people he does not like or can understand. And actually goes around calling people out on them, al...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 20:12:00
|
3760. 1.7 respec - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Bendtner92 wrote: If the CPM hasn't and still are letting CCP know that the respec coming in 1.7 is completely unfair and has several problems, I urge you to tell CCP and try to get the respec changed. I summed it up in a small post here , bu...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.01 20:11:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |