| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
621. Vehicle Threads? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: Pilot complaints? They released the pilot suit and I missed it? Well, looks like I gotta grind for my 6th PRO Minmatar suit. lol you don't use vehicles. You have an irrational fear and hatred of them.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.06 05:59:00
|
622. Vehicle Threads? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sergeant Sazu wrote: Hmmm, you're right. Spkr is becoming more vocal along with a bunch of other people I've never seen before. Panda Uzimaki will not be joining us as far as I know, unfortunately. No laughs this time around. I've always be...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.06 05:57:00
|
623. Vehicles users don't want Pilot suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: incoherent drooling I'm not the one trying to ruin the game for a small subsection of the community/playerbase. You are. Who the hell are you to say pilots don't want the pilot suit? YOU'RE NOT A PILOT. Who the hell are...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.06 02:33:00
|
624. Vehicles users don't want Pilot suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lupus Wolf wrote: If it enhances the piloting ability, and/or has enough equipment bandwidth for 2 uplinks and a hive, then I won't mind it. I just want it to make vehicles better, that's all. I don't care about an equipment slot, weapons, or...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.06 01:45:00
|
625. Vehicles users don't want Pilot suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: They do not, at least not in the long run. Why? Because it would ultimately be an SP and ISK sink. Vehicles would eventually be balanced around pilot suits. This would mean that pilot suits wouldn't be s...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.06 01:40:00
|
626. Vehicles users don't want Pilot suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: They do not, at least not in the long run. Why? Because it would ultimately be an SP and ISK sink. Vehicles would eventually be balanced around pilot suits. This would mean that pilot suits wouldn't be so much an enhancem...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.06 01:12:00
|
627. AV vs Vehicle situation is almost at 1.6 level - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: and they do not ignore obstacles and terrain, that is simply a lie. Do you even pilot? I watch and feel swarms going around obstacles and over terrain all the time.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 20:19:00
|
628. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer XCIV wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: They do in fact have the highest TTK. Even the worst tank will take 7-9 seconds of continuous fire or ambush preparation to kill. That's a shitfit tank. A decent one can take 12...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 20:14:00
|
629. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
ImIvan wrote: I don't have much SP into tanks, but trust me, tanks are not UP, I only have some ADV modules and it's so easy to wreck infantry and to run away from AV. The reason I don't use tanks very often is because it's boring, there's not ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 20:12:00
|
630. The Best Way To Buff Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vitantur Nothus wrote: Of course pilots want to be buffed. Most of them believe that 1.7 was balanced. Oh, yeah, we think removing hulls, turrets and modules to be balanced, along with slashing the amount of slots vehicles have. Yeah, that's ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 18:21:00
|
631. The Best Way To Buff Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: More clinically insane drooling from someone with an irrational fear and hatred for vehicles.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 18:18:00
|
632. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Duke Noobiam wrote: I know, I said we need more modes without vehicles and vehicles need their own game mode that would give them a purpose rather than a means to attain a high kdr by farming infantry. So according to you, a pilot's only pu...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 18:17:00
|
633. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer XCIV wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: So Spkr has something to ***** about. Point out where I'm wrong or stating a falsehood. The part where you say tanks are paper. T...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 18:12:00
|
634. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nothing Certain wrote: All you have to do to not be killed by swarms is be a scout, so why are you complaining? So you're saying that if I don't want to be killed by AV, I should be infantry instead? Maybe you should find a different game t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 18:06:00
|
635. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Q. Why Are Vehicles Here? A: On-board Spawn Systems, Transportation, and AV. So according to you, they shouldn't have any anti-infantry capability?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 18:05:00
|
636. This is flat out unfair - in General Discussions [original thread]
recounted wrote: Im basically broke after every match due to me fighting close up shottys knifers and those ******* redliners who snipes you from god knows where also the heavy(s) who ganks on your ass if your attention span is off. Back to the...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 18:04:00
|
637. AV vs Vehicle situation is almost at 1.6 level - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: That was entirely on CCP, not us. Did you miss the part where I said that now we can't tell which tier of swarm someone is firing at us? Of course you missed it. yes i did miss that part but like i said it was tank...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 07:12:00
|
638. AV vs Vehicle situation is almost at 1.6 level - in General Discussions [original thread]
That's poorly written, so I'm gonna wrack my brain to try to read, understand and reply to it.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 07:03:00
|
639. AV vs Vehicle situation is almost at 1.6 level - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: tanks are not op, then complains that tanks gets 3 shotted by tank......... Where was I complaining? i never asked to reduce the missile count for swarms so yeah that was tankers That was entirely on CCP, not us...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 06:21:00
|
640. AV vs Vehicle situation is almost at 1.6 level - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: Says tanks arnt OP but uses the example of soma being OP as excuse. Again, a glass railgun. Meaning it takes out other vehicles, not infantry. Methinks you should buy the reading comprehension skill book. also so i...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.05 05:41:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |