| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
301. Petition to Bring back Corp battles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Draco Cerberus wrote: Well, although Dust 514 is a Free-to-play game, anyone who uses it is still a potential if not already existing customer. While I agree that it is questionable at this point in time if anyone feels paying for items or auru...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.02.01 16:14:00
|
302. 5x sp for wp - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: When ccp did the 5x sp for wp earned during the triple sp event, that's how it needs to be, all the time. Theres no difference between my sp gained from getting 1500wp and from AFKing. Yeah, I really felt like my pla...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.31 22:46:00
|
303. Dropships are in a good place - in General Discussions [original thread]
I had to learn the hard way that ADS turrets do not work like you would expect them to. I thought my enemy was still aligning the gun while I was charging my plasma cannon. I didn't even get my shot off. Also, do ADS not appear on the radar for a...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.31 21:56:00
|
304. How can MAVs and MTACs be useful in DUST - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Its like the logi DS, it offers something that you cant generally do Currently the idea of a APC or a APDS means you can have ppl spawn in, also i would add in the ability to rep infantrys armor if they are inside the...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.31 21:00:00
|
305. let's talk dust: cloak uses? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fire of Prometheus wrote: Invisible commandos I always felt that Commandos should be like commandos in C&C games. One man armies due to their really high damage output, but squishy as hell. A role that is best run solo, with a scan prof...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.31 20:57:00
|
306. Petition to Bring back Corp battles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Squagga wrote: Customers is a loose term Reminds me of a phrase: "The person not paying is what's on sale"
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.31 20:38:00
|
307. Aim assist idea - Target painters - in General Discussions [original thread]
Too much potential for Blueberries to cause you to have a harder time hitting your actual targets. I'd prefer a direct lock-on mechanic. Remember Section 8? That would work because it's less dependant on random team members. Unfortunately, it migh...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.31 20:16:00
|
308. Dropships are in a good place - in General Discussions [original thread]
The real issue currently is that ordinary dropships are pointless for lone wolfs and ADS cost hundreds of thousands of SP. It should be the other way around, considering that ADS are basically less specialized with the fact that they can be operat...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.31 19:54:00
|
309. Don't be a Madrugar Blaster Pilot - in General Discussions [original thread]
I use Blaster Madrugar because I'm Gallente and because I suck at tanking. When I tank, it's because the redline snipers pissed me off or because there's too many tanks on the field. Or too many dudes with proto RRs.
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.31 19:53:00
|
310. let's talk dust: cloak uses? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I seriously hope that sprint is possible while cloaked. Anyway: - Sprinting up to an HAV and planting remotes while they feel safe - Sprinting into a group of people and planting remotes - Flanking enemies. Shotgunning heavies, for example. - Sne...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.31 19:49:00
|
311. Large blaster turrets removal? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Denn Maell wrote: The attitude that rails are AV and blasters are AI has always been a silly one. Especially when every other Rail has been good vs. armor, and blasters are good versus shields. Large turrets should be AV Small Turrets are for...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.31 18:09:00
|
312. Petition to Bring back Corp battles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote: So by all means, continue to berate IWS for sharing the truth, which is that Corp Contracts are not going to magically appear in 1.8 because you made a petition and got a bunch of people angry at a perceived slight....
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.30 09:50:00
|
313. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: message from Godin: Damage - 45 RoF - similar to what it is now Range - 100M to 150M Whoa, 45 damage, that's it. Yeah man, it's a specialized turret, meant to kill infantry. But not just KILL, suppress. It's the same conc...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.29 21:47:00
|
314. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Making a turret do way less DPS than the original (which sucks as a AV turret), nerfing the accuracy of it then calling that the AV turret, and making another turret that is weaker then the infantry version, in every way po...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.29 21:26:00
|
315. Petition to Bring back Corp battles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: -Snip- Wait, are you really arguing that the ability for corps to do competitive play with no strings attached would somehow cause them to burn out? The ability for friendly matches and to mess around with allied corp...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.29 21:11:00
|
316. No risk Huge reward! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I HateMyFace wrote: I didnt know about this before. But now I'm going to durka burka muhammed jihad jeep the **** out of you. For some religious diversity, I will instead scream "Gott will es!" ("God wants it!" or "God wills it!"), which wa...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.29 18:54:00
|
317. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thumpers It plays on "dustbunnies" as well as the fact that we thump the ground when we spawn and the fact that we pound enemies into oblivion. A name based on FPS games would be funny. It would be recursive fluff, but it makes sense - In-univers...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.29 17:40:00
|
318. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: I assume you misread my statement. They, the infantry are tanked heavily. Frigates at the most for PVP (the good ones anyways) have at most only a DCU. The rest is fitted to be really fast. Otherwise, bigger hulls will eat ...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.29 10:38:00
|
319. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: I think the answer is both. I'm not finished yet, there is still a lot of subject matter to cover. But yes, both, all turrets need variants that help define the given role. Among those variants, you will have some good for AV...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.28 22:04:00
|
320. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't quite understand what your approach is. Are you proposing to have variants for all turrets, with different roles or are you proposing to remove AI capability from all large turrets, while changing small turrets into AV? At the beginning i...
- by Sole Fenychs - at 2014.01.28 21:31:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |