| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
921. what's wrong with the amarr assault... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Why the **** does it matter? Amarr things are usually slower than other things. Amarr things have slightly more eHP than other things. Amarr things have more cap/stamina than most other things. Just harden up like the res...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.28 02:55:00
|
922. Quafe dropships are going to ruin my life - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: If you care to read it again, you'll note that the only BPOs listed are the LAVs, everything else says BPC , as in COPY, not ORIGINAL. What is a BPC?
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.28 01:13:00
|
923. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: What is the point of the Driver? -Main Pilot's Jobs- Use Large Turret to defend against enemy installations and vehicles Use Large Turret to suppress/assist Small Turret Gunners when fighting infantry...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.28 00:33:00
|
924. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: What is the point of the Driver? Driving and Shooting stuff. shooting stuff like what? If we can't shoot infantry why would anyone even spawn a tank.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.28 00:06:00
|
925. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Doc DDD wrote: I'm fairly certain the AV infantry community convinced the devs to make the large blaster an AV weapon using fuzzy logic. Apparently the only purpose of calling in...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.27 23:43:00
|
926. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Doc DDD wrote: I'm fairly certain the AV infantry community convinced the devs to make the large blaster an AV weapon using fuzzy logic. Apparently the only purpose of calling in an HAV was supposed to be to battle other ...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.27 23:00:00
|
927. Option to sell Strongbox loot as soon as we open Please!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
You have to admit, a lot of the stuff is trash so we might as well have a button to sell it right away.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.27 22:27:00
|
928. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Harpyja wrote: It would be balanced if said AP blaster HAV was rather defenseless against AV HAVs. Just like AV infantry pose a threat to vehicles but are vulnerable to other infantry, the blaster HAV should pose a threa...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.27 20:55:00
|
929. which commando get damage bonus to the swarm launchers? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Luna McDuffing wrote: I was told it was the minmatar but, when I look at the loyalty store the swarm launchers appear under caldari. SO which one is it? Sadly, Minmatar has been stealing weapons like Nova Knives and Swarms and adjusting thei...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.27 03:32:00
|
930. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: As to the blaster, its current form is as anti-infantry, and trying to force it to be AV only makes it more useless than it is. Either dedicate it to AI at the expense of AV, or completely overhaul it f...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.27 02:42:00
|
931. scanners are freekin ********. - in General Discussions [original thread]
saxonmish wrote: everything can be scanned by a gal logi and its stupid Saxonmish rage... This turns me on... The little rager inside of me tells me to go rage!! F*ck these st*pid as* Mother flippin Gallante Bi*h as* Lo*is th*t f*king sp...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.27 02:40:00
|
932. @Rattati: Will we be getting a respec when vehicles are reintroduced... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Major IMPACT wrote: Most likely. They gave us a respec when the faction scouts, heavys, etc came out Sadly ,i'm afraid that they will force us to buy one because they added in that feature so no more free respecs.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.27 01:57:00
|
933. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Tell me, if light weapons are AP like Combat Rifle with DPS of 600. Isn't it on to have a combat rifle like side arm (SMG) with lower DPS as a secondary? Anyway, false, they were good but not OP. HMG ha...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.27 01:55:00
|
934. Destroyer HAV! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: True Adamance wrote: Thats and IFV bro...... It says LAV in the title bro.... I'm no BF4 expert but i'm pretty sure nobody has played more and knows more about BF4 than LevelCap. I take that ba...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.26 22:33:00
|
935. Destroyer HAV! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Thats and IFV bro...... It says LAV in the title bro.... I'm no BF4 expert but i'm pretty sure nobody has played more and knows more about BF4 than LevelCap.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.26 21:19:00
|
936. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Whatever is AP/AI get's nerfed to sh*t because infantry cry... There was not a single good complaint between chromosome and 1.6 about large blaster turrets. Than CCP messed them up. They need to go back t...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.26 21:18:00
|
937. Attention Enemies of the Federation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mex-0 wrote: A reminder of what the republic can do to it's enemies. Why is he using Caldari Tech? Same with the Gallante in the back.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.26 20:59:00
|
938. Destroyer HAV! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I have come to thinking that these DHAV's are going to be lightly armored fast moving small super powerful vehicles. When I think of lightly armored/low HP vehicles I think of small hulls, kind of like battle field LAV's... Rattati, it would be...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.26 20:58:00
|
939. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Rattati- Don't reduce missiles ammo- it is unnecessary nerf and no need for it. Also the Blaster should fire slower but do more damage per shot. When I think of Tank Large Cannons, I think of slow firing high damage type of round. https://ww...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.26 20:54:00
|
940. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Dear players, We want to reach a 100% equilibrium between the AV capabilities of Large Turrets, their primary purpose. The AI of Large Turrets should be thought in terms of an Acti...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.26 20:43:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |