| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
1041. How to balance Dust 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hi OP, Thank you for the well-written post. I have two weaponry-related questions for you , if I may: 1) How would you respond to claims of AR "every-role" superiority evidenced by Duvolle proliferation in PC? 2) What changes, if any, would you ...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.09.01 04:38:00
|
1042. To Every Tanker Who Ever Complained - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Keep what in mind? That if tanks are buffed by unreasonable degree -- and presently viable counters are stripped of efficacy -- that smart tankers like you would be indistinguishable from myriad others amidst pu...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.09.01 03:53:00
|
1043. To Every Tanker Who Ever Complained - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nguruthos IX wrote: invalid sample size : / Some games no AV aims at my dropship. Obviously those are great. Then someone pulls a militia forge+swarm and I'm locked out of the map forever on penalty of death Agreed, IX. This is the first ...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.09.01 02:12:00
|
1044. To Every Tanker Who Ever Complained - in General Discussions [original thread]
Victory! We only lost 10 clones! Tanks are so guud! Sep 01 2013, 01:30 (EVE) - Ambush OMS - Bridge Map Tank #1 - Isarc Grewem (9/0) Tank #2 - Barbosa07z (9/0) Tank #3 - ShadowOfWar88 (9/0) Tank #4 - Diablo-Gun-Pro (4/0) Tank #5 - Reve Zephos (8/1...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.09.01 02:00:00
|
1045. the scout suit blues - in General Discussions [original thread]
knight of 6 wrote: Denial Anger Bargaining < me Depression Acceptance That's hilarious bro. +1
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 23:51:00
|
1046. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Django Quik wrote: Stacking penalties are explicitly stated on items that get them ... of course, all this uncertainty would be moot if CCP gave us the actual stats ... Agreed. I've searched the Forums for precedent and have come up with no...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 18:53:00
|
1047. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vin Mora wrote: So damn, when I get that Proto scanner you bastards can still sneak up on me. :) Good, scouts can be scary and scanners are more for everyone else anyway. \o/ for sneaky bastardry! No worries though, Vin. We'll still be pap...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 18:25:00
|
1048. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vin Mora wrote: Can run similar number on what your Scan Sig will be? Hi Vin, Click back a few pages ... the requested scenarios have already been run for Scan Profile. - Shotty
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 18:13:00
|
1049. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Passive Scan Range (Assuming Percentage Overlap) Lvl(1) Light-Frame = 10.00 meters Lvl(1) Gallente Scout = +10% = 11.00 meters Lvl(2) Gallente Scout = +10% = 12.10 meters Lvl(3) Gallente Scout = +10% = 13.31 meters Lvl(4) Gallente Scout = +10% =...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 18:02:00
|
1050. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Django Quik wrote: BTW - here is where Void was telling us about his scanning range findings: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1189668#post1189668 voidfaction wrote: Django Quik wrote: voidfaction wrote: base x ...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 17:42:00
|
1051. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Django Quik wrote: Thanks for the pointers, though you've misunderstood me on a couple of bits - I don't snipe (not much anyway); I go on foot along the enemy redline and other known camping spots and sneak up on enemy snipers to pop them in t...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 17:11:00
|
1052. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Keeriam Miray wrote: When i run my shotty gk.0 scout with 3 Cmp Amplifiers .. I can imaging a 50m or so passive scan radius would be incredibly helpful to a shotgunner. I'm going to have to give this a try, Keeriam. Though for this build, I...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 17:03:00
|
1053. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Django Quik wrote: I've been wondering about how passive scanning shows up in game - does it only show the red dots on the radar or do you see a chevron on the screen too if they're behind a hill or wall or something? Been reading through all ...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 16:44:00
|
1054. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nyra Volki wrote: Shotty GoBang wrote: Nyra Volki wrote: I don't know if people don't use Adv or higher active scanners in matches but I've only been successfuly scan once in my pro gal scout with lvl 3 Damp the funny thing was I was surp...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 08:52:00
|
1055. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nyra Volki wrote: I don't know if people don't use Adv or higher active scanners in matches but I've only been successfuly scan once in my pro gal scout with lvl 3 Damp the funny thing was I was surprised and scared at the same time when it hap...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 08:40:00
|
1056. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Matticus Monk wrote: Solid posts, Shotty! Excellent info on the dampening, range and scan precision. I have a bit of bad news on the scan precision though: unfortunately the precision enhancer module is a high slot item. For the STD and PRO...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 07:42:00
|
1057. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Attn Light-Frame Brothers: The number to beat is 28 dB, and we can get there by stacking two Enhanced Dampeners. 45.00 dB - Light-Frame 44.10 dB - Profile Dampening Level 1 (-2%) 43.22 dB - Profile Dampening Level 2 (-2%) 42.35 dB - Profile Damp...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 07:26:00
|
1058. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Attn Level 3 Scouts: Here's your Stealth Optimization. The number to beat is 28 dB. 45.00 dB - Light-Frame 42.75 dB - Scout Level 1 (-5%) 40.61 dB - Scout Level 2 (-5%) 38.58 dB - Scout Level 3 (-5%) < --- I use this higher number to be safe....
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 07:20:00
|
1059. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ran another scenario for Stealth Optimization, this time minimizing SP investment and gear requirements. Keep in mind the number to beat is 28 dB, so we can be immune to all but one (very crappy) Meta 9 Active Scanner. The following config just ...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 06:56:00
|
1060. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
DISGRUNTLEDev wrote: Yeah, 'cause you're going to want to hide from the Meta 8 Quantum scanner that highlights you for 25 full seconds. The magic number, boys and girls, is 28dB. The Meta 9 scanner is only useful for a 5 second highlight. Alth...
- by Shotty GoBang - at 2013.08.31 06:05:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |