Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
501. Why a low average TTK bad. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Actually the number of people complaining on how useless the duvolle has been verse the gek has been increasing substantially. Probably because the system is like EVE, where you can skill into a weapon and then fit a...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.12 00:26:00
|
502. Why a low average TTK bad. - in General Discussions [original thread]
crazy space 1 wrote: Rowdy Railgunner wrote: crazy space 1 wrote: I've got 12 million skill points and I can get just as many kills using militia gear , this isn't right :/ why did I level up? So that your militia gear is better. That i...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.12 00:20:00
|
503. Why a low average TTK bad. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryder Azorria wrote: Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: So the best solution in combination with some adjustments to weapon performance would be a direct damage nerf to overall output of the problem weapons. Remember when...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.12 00:16:00
|
504. Why a low average TTK bad. - in General Discussions [original thread]
crazy space 1 wrote: I've got 12 million skill points and I can get just as many kills using militia gear , this isn't right :/ why did I level up? So that your militia gear is better. That is what the skill system is in place for.
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.12 00:11:00
|
505. Time to kill is NOT too low. - in General Discussions [original thread]
TEXA5 HiTM4N wrote: ive seen 1710 hp heavies get floored in less than half a second by a GEK. No you haven't. It is mathematically impossible for a single GEK to do that. What you saw was a heavy getting hit by multiple people and the GEK got...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 23:53:00
|
506. Time to kill is NOT too low. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cenex Langly wrote: HyperionsThunder wrote: lol I killed you last night and stole your LAV :-) (It was revenge for shooting me with that blaster turret) EDIT: I agree, TTK isn't bad - people just need to use cover more. The point about ...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 23:52:00
|
507. true Dust514 players please rally behind me - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN Marauder wrote: Yeah! I want my strafing shooter back ! **** this cod 5 shot BS Meanwhile, strafing was practically invented when HALO came out and perfected on COD2 and is a twitch shooter mechanic. CS, COD, TF.... yeah you want a twi...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 23:49:00
|
508. Time to kill is NOT too low. - in General Discussions [original thread]
lol strafing skills... You guys want a tactical shooter, and then use strafing as an argument. Strafing is not in a tactical game, that is a twitch shooter mechanic. You people are so confused you don't even know what you are arguing for.
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 23:43:00
|
509. Why a low average TTK bad. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: So the best solution in combination with some adjustments to weapon performance would be a direct damage nerf to overall output of the problem weapons. Remember when 1.0 rolled out we had issued out a 10% damage BUFF...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 23:37:00
|
510. Why a low average TTK bad. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Considering that a 'DREN' shotgun with no skills in it can down a 1200 HP heavy in 3 shots I find your entire argument invalid. I also find that people think that just because only one person shows up on the kill screen that that is the only perso...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 23:33:00
|
511. A 10% damage reduction to all the weapons wouldn't help the weapon balance. - in General Discussions [original thread]
If you want to reduce the DMG by 10% then quit equipping 3 or 4 complex light damage modifiers and use that slot to fit a tank. There you go problem solved TTK goes up and damage goes down.
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 22:25:00
|
512. Time to kill is NOT too low. - in General Discussions [original thread]
R'adeh Hunt wrote: The alternative you listed is worse!! Right now it's pretty pointless to run proto gear at all and Dust is essentially a twitch shooter with a lot of the tactical elements removed... Aim assist is totally over the top. If...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 22:19:00
|
513. Time to kill is NOT too low. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheherazade VII wrote: Rowdy Railgunner wrote: time to kill is fine because as an assault rifle user I can now kill starter fits more easily.. anybody who says the TTK is fine is just happy that they can carry on killing starter fits i...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 22:15:00
|
514. Man I want that combat rifle. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pje251296 wrote: The combat and rail rifles do look promising, hopefully we get mlt variants as well to test them out on alts. Why would you need to test then out on alts?
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 17:57:00
|
515. Time to kill is NOT too low. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monty Mole Clone wrote: Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Everyone saying that it is too low need to HTFU. Or would you rather have every tank mod in the game nerfed and not even worth equipping. If you raise time to kill all you are doing is ensuring...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 17:56:00
|
516. true Dust514 players please rally behind me - in General Discussions [original thread]
steadyhand amarr wrote: Rowdy Railgunner wrote: steadyhand amarr wrote: Pretty much the whole fourm agrees with me along with cpm and top 1% of players. So sorry ur wrong. No blue posts means ccp screwed up and as past history has sh...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 16:31:00
|
517. Time to kill is NOT too low. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Krom Ganesh wrote: Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Then quit running towards people from the front. *You've been scanned* *You've been scanned* *You've been scanned* *You've been scanned* *You've been scanned* *You've been scanned* *You've been ...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 16:22:00
|
518. Time to kill is NOT too low. - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnYuM wrote: Rowdy Railgunner wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Buff move speed Train your kinetics up. sigh you might want to look up that skill again BTW I don't like it when trash quote my posts. Just thought of my words being in your po...
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 16:20:00
|
519. Time to kill is NOT too low. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Melchiah ARANeAE wrote: Another perfect example of who CCP shouldn't listen to. Yes you are.
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 16:11:00
|
520. Time to kill is NOT too low. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Rowdy Railgunner wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Buff move speed Train your kinetics up. I got it to 5. Try again. Then quit running towards people from the front. Be sneaky sneaky like a scout is supposed to be.
- by Rowdy Railgunner - at 2013.11.11 16:10:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |