Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
321. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
BMSTUBBY wrote: We have a squad finder mechanic already right? Why not have a Team Deploy mechanic in place for the randoms that do not want to get proto stomped in FW? Any random can then jump into a team that has spots open. Just a thought....
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.30 18:38:00
|
322. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: Yep, this is why the old corp contracts had to go. It's the new eden way "When you cant win, loose" For ever to be known as "pulling a shad" Yea I am still pissed that you turned mercs into farmers...
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.30 18:15:00
|
323. Noticed something. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: yay another thread thats a repeat of a repeat of a repeat. the mods really need to work on the forums to clean them up and make these repeat threads a thing of the past If mods followed the forums rules then all DEVs w...
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.30 18:14:00
|
324. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: We first need to be able to build the team, but then matching that team into a battle that is fun and balanced without waiting an eternity and still allowing factions to push is trickier than it sounds. Translation: This...
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.30 17:58:00
|
325. Noticed something. - in General Discussions [original thread]
All I notice is that this whole game is pretty unbalanced. I guess one issue at the time heh, too bad that CCP creates more issues than they solve.
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.30 16:33:00
|
326. The next logical step for the skill tree - in General Discussions [original thread]
N1ck Comeau wrote: Didn't get your tuna this morning? The Russians stole it.
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.30 16:25:00
|
327. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: RKKR wrote: Guys, don't believe the "LONG TERM PLAN" nonsense until they share it with us. It's the same as the SOON(TM), ROADMAP,... stuff. Maybe they should put on their communication-hat for once. Jesus, RKKR, somet...
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.30 16:10:00
|
328. Should Remote Explosives Kill a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well I guess this discussion is lame as it doesn't take opinions of the opposite site into consideration because you didn't take pics, or are just a "hater". and it completely ignores the current unbalanced AV-weapons/vehicles stuff going on, so ...
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.30 16:01:00
|
329. Dear CCP Nullarbor - in General Discussions [original thread]
All infrantry that can drop uplinks get WP for it. Uplinks are limited, spawnkillable and easy to destroy. Uplinks aren't mobile. Uplinks can't shoot people. Giving HAVs the same reward for CRU is stupid, if you only do it for the WP, you are do...
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.30 11:26:00
|
330. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Guys, don't believe the "LONG TERM PLAN" nonsense until they share it with us. It's the same as the SOON(TM), ROADMAP,... stuff. Maybe they should put on their communication-hat for once.
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.30 10:49:00
|
331. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: we havn't done it yet because it's a lot of work And this is why all previous patches (and probably future ones) were worthless.
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.30 09:17:00
|
332. Who would get behind this? - in General Discussions [original thread]
AP Grasshopper wrote: RKKR wrote: Guess what, most logis picked gallente Logi from the start so they could run higher defense meta modules and proto equipment. Most went Caldari in the beginning actually. Yeah for playing "LogiBros" .
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.29 20:31:00
|
333. I guess there will not be a 1.8 coming in January? - in General Discussions [original thread]
and then we have the asian holidays and then we have summer break and then ...
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.29 19:02:00
|
334. Who would get behind this? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maybe. Do I get more rewards for repping higher meta gear or using higher meta gear? Using a MLT AR is more effective than using a MLT nanohive compared to their their higher META-gear. Point is META game is unbalanced, **** and ruining the gam...
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.29 18:11:00
|
335. Who would get behind this? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Guess what, most logis picked gallente Logi from the start so they could run higher defense meta modules and proto equipment.
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.29 17:51:00
|
336. Anti Vehicle fluxes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Flux grenades don't need a variant. One that has more than 1 pulse would be nice. It's not that it is going to insta-kill someone when you throw one a mile away from your target like a core locus.
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.29 17:45:00
|
337. Who would get behind this? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Master Jaraiya wrote: Justice Prevails wrote: Like the idea, but as RKKR stated, a logi genuinely wanting to help his team would be screwed. If you exclude equipment, base it on weapons, and modules and suits, it might work. Might be too com...
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.29 17:37:00
|
338. Dust 2.0 =Pseudo Streaming= - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soooo...what are the chanches for CCP to finally rework the game instead of building further on bad design?
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.29 17:16:00
|
339. What was the 25th December surprise? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: Are these things just getting automatically applied to our assets? I haven't had to apply anything upon logging in as I've had to in the past. 7th of January during DT. Ansiiis The Trustworthy wrote: So... The usual...
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.29 17:09:00
|
340. Who would get behind this? - in General Discussions [original thread]
More reasons to not LogiBro. Yes!
- by RKKR - at 2013.12.29 17:05:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |