| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
361. What's the deal with good players from good corps staying in the MCC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buster Friently wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: I have a better question, why is it always the players who are like 1-4 or worse who are the ones that try to suicide the AFKers? You cannot feel entitled to me playing when your individual perform...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.21 22:53:00
|
362. What's the deal with good players from good corps staying in the MCC - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have a better question, why is it always the players who are like 1-4 or worse who are the ones that try to suicide the AFKers? You cannot feel entitled to me playing when your individual performance is so detrimental to the team. Maybe if those...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.21 22:34:00
|
363. What is the point of splash damage on swarm homing missiles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Has anybody ever tested if that "splash damage" is now a blast radius sort of thing and they never changed the text for it? I know in EVE blast radius means a lot when talking about missiles. A bigger blast radius equates to more damage to a targe...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.21 22:20:00
|
364. Large Mortars to Counter Railguns - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:M2_-_24th_MEU.jpg Hey look guys! Its a self propelled 50!
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.14 21:58:00
|
365. Large Mortars to Counter Railguns - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So putting a weapon on/in a vehicle turns it into a differant kind of weapon? Awesome. Ill notify the military that they can take crew served MGs and put them on Abrams as the main cannon to save money. Putting a mortar inside an APC does not make...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.14 21:56:00
|
366. Large Mortars to Counter Railguns - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Oxskull Duncarino wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: Mortars are not the same as artillery, just an FYI. As such they would not exceed the range of a railgun. If anything they would match it, but w...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.14 21:04:00
|
367. Dev Blog: Planetary Conquest - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: Why are most of the questions always on stuff that doesnt half matter? How bout some legit questions/concerns/feedback here. In regards to planetary conquest (NOT FW): It is stated these battles will...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.14 18:31:00
|
368. Dev Blog: Planetary Conquest - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
Why are most of the questions always on stuff that doesnt half matter? How bout some legit questions/concerns/feedback here. In regards to planetary conquest (NOT FW): It is stated these battles will be skirmishes, but the only win condition is ...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.14 18:16:00
|
369. Large Mortars to Counter Railguns - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: Mortars are not the same as artillery, just an FYI. As such they would not exceed the range of a railgun. If anything they would match it, but would probably be closer to mass driver range on our ...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.14 17:21:00
|
370. Large Mortars to Counter Railguns - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mortars are not the same as artillery, just an FYI. As such they would not exceed the range of a railgun. If anything they would match it, but would probably be closer to mass driver range on our current maps. It would also need to be rotatable to...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.14 16:06:00
|
371. Should Turret Installations be A.I. Only? - in General Discussions [original thread]
No, just cause you lost another of your tanks to a manned installation does not mean they need to be AI only.
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.13 23:41:00
|
372. My Response to the Worst Review of Dust 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
His video was actually better. Most of the points he brought up were very valid, whereas you were just tickling CCP with your tonsils the entire time. There is no excuse for CCP to have allowed this game to go open beta knowing they would not be a...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.12 18:25:00
|
373. SP Refunded - in General Discussions [original thread]
Only a couple thousand, but thats cause I was smart enough to make sure passive was working when I logged on after reset, and was also smart enough to say "hey, I wonder if I switch passive to an alt and switch it back if it will start working aga...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.11 04:42:00
|
374. Switch the Sagaris Marauder skill from missiles to railguns. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: How about instead we make missiles work better and keep Caldari having a bonus to missiles since thats their lore weapon of choice. I know its a hard concept to grasp, but it can be done. We have ...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.11 02:12:00
|
375. Compromise with the large railgun - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: Your suggestions have to be the worst Ive ever seen, they make no sense at all. Rail splash is already smaller than it should be. Have you ever even tried to hit people with a rail? Yes and I c...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.11 02:09:00
|
376. Switch the Sagaris Marauder skill from missiles to railguns. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
How about instead we make missiles work better and keep Caldari having a bonus to missiles since thats their lore weapon of choice. I know its a hard concept to grasp, but it can be done. We have the technology.
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.11 02:02:00
|
377. Compromise with the large railgun - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Your suggestions have to be the worst Ive ever seen, they make no sense at all. Rail splash is already smaller than it should be. Have you ever even tried to hit people with a rail?
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.11 02:00:00
|
378. He is NASTY with the MD [video] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aqil Aegivan wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: You dont even realize that yours wasnt a spelling error but rather improper word usage, which I feel is a worse grammar **** offense since many words are spelled differant than they sound. And don...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.08 03:43:00
|
379. He is NASTY with the MD [video] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thog A Kuma wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: Thog A Kuma wrote: Please folks, try that stupid weapon before you claim there is no skill involved. It is one thing to be ignorant quietly, but proving is totally unnecessary. Here's some advise t...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.08 03:27:00
|
380. He is NASTY with the MD [video] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thog A Kuma wrote: Please folks, try that stupid weapon before you claim there is no skill involved. It is one thing to be ignorant quietly, but proving is totally unnecessary. Here's some advise though, when outfitting you can only have nanoh...
- by RECON BY FIRE - at 2013.03.08 02:42:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |