| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
5101. Like, Dude, Seriously - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: As long as they're equal, that's what matters most. -99/99? Haha well that's a bit extreme but would be pretty funny to play with in a testing environment.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.25 18:55:00
|
5102. Aeon's Statement - in General Discussions [original thread]
ISDs are really a fantastic tool that needs to be pushed for in the community. We have so many strong groups of people who understand the game VERY well and need to be able to easily work with other talented individuals to put forth highly develop...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.25 18:44:00
|
5103. Aeon's Statement - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zelda Harkinian wrote: oh, ok, now I understand. yeah, I like that about him too. I thought you meant snarky as in making sarcastic remarks or trying to be funny when the situation doesn't call for it... as someone else is prone to doing every...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.25 18:19:00
|
5104. Like, Dude, Seriously - in General Discussions [original thread]
The issue is that we have 5 Damage Types in Dust and only 4 in EVE."Hybrid-Rail" is weird one and has the profile that Projectile should have had. However they wanted Caldari and Gallente to opposites in Dust so they gave Caldari the opposing dama...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.25 18:17:00
|
5105. Aeon's Statement - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zelda Harkinian wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: I will still listen, on the CPM or not. Only if you keep the snarky attitude. That's the #1 one reason I like you. Oh and the Dust balancing stuff is somewhere in there too....
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.25 18:04:00
|
5106. Like, Dude, Seriously - in General Discussions [original thread]
Id actually vote for a -5/+5 so its not identical to Hybrid Rail at -10/+10, but the concept is the same. Armor and Shield damage deltas need to be the same.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.25 17:48:00
|
5107. Aeon's Statement - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: I will still listen, on the CPM or not. Only if you keep the snarky attitude. That's the #1 one reason I like you. Oh and the Dust balancing stuff is somewhere in there too.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.25 17:34:00
|
5108. Not impressed taking Electronics from 4 to 5 for 777K SP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well the Core Skills to V is nice because you're done with them, you've got the full benefit, and you never have to deal with them again. Never will you go "uhg I need to train Electronics to V to do this fit..."
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.25 17:29:00
|
5109. Well, it could've been worse - in General Discussions [original thread]
I-Shayz-I wrote: That said, Judge has made quite a few amazing videos in the past to easily prove that he is capable of looking at both sides of a situation and can relay information very well. He's also the only candidate that's well known f...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.25 17:21:00
|
5110. Aeon's Statement - in General Discussions [original thread]
*pat pat* There there buddy, it'll be fine. Still lots of work for us to do, even if we're not on CPM. I don't expect our heated talks (albeit riddled with scope creep at times) to stop any time soon. Got some really solid names in there, hopefull...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.25 17:10:00
|
5111. Not impressed taking Electronics from 4 to 5 for 777K SP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Level 5 is almost always purely for optimization and is not nearly as valuable at level 1-4 in terms of Gain vs SP cost. SP Cost of Lvl 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = SP Cost of Lvl 5 That being said CCP Is typically pretty good at forcing you to get level 5 t...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.25 15:56:00
|
5112. Analyzing CPM1 results. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Immortal John Ripper wrote: CEOPyrex CloneA wrote: I put that into a pie chart so its clear the spread of votes, thanks for the breakdown btw, v good stuff. Graph of the CPM1 elections via Twitter Things look much clearer in the pie cha...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.25 15:47:00
|
5113. Balance is IMPOSSIBLE! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: Yes - AV weps have tiers. Yes - there is basically one tier of tanks (SP needed for MAD/GL is negligible) BUT You forgot the tanker's "hidden" tiers. That is the module levels and the ability to fit more and better of...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.25 15:30:00
|
5114. Why doesn't anyone think logistics needs a buff? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Baal Omniscient wrote: I personally think that medium suits should have higher regen that light suits since light suits have the advantage of a smaller hitbox, stealth, scanning and speed built right into the suit. Logi's getting a little less...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.24 23:46:00
|
5115. Disappointment in Endorsement lists by candidates - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zion Shad wrote: Just as you have the right (and I stated this in OP) to voice your opnion about other candidates, I did the same. It just looks to me that the CPM was again chosen by people behind the scenes and behind the community's back. No...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.24 22:26:00
|
5116. Why doesn't anyone think logistics needs a buff? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Entirely legitimate suggestions..... Min Logi = Repping Mad Bomber? I suppose the Target Painter was a bit far fetched and falls into EWAR/ Scout not Logi.... Trust me I would LOVE the idea of Target Painters, but we d...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.24 21:56:00
|
5117. Balance is IMPOSSIBLE! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I think a big issue here is that they attempted a half assed tiericide on vehicles, making instantaneous effectiveness the exact same regardless of tier of the active module you're using (ie 40% Reduction for Shield Hardener for all tiers). Howeve...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.24 21:44:00
|
5118. Why doesn't anyone think logistics needs a buff? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Meee One wrote: True Adamance wrote: Not really the opposite...... more like roughly similar with a different focus...... No not the same,logistics shouldn't be killing things. logistics should be able to survive easier though. Maybe a ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.24 21:12:00
|
5119. Why doesn't anyone think logistics needs a buff? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Meee One wrote: Assaults would still have. -eHP -everything else better than basics -to sacrifice nothing logistics would have -speed and regen to make up for their eHP being SO DAMNED CLOSE to scouts -lower eHP - 1 weapon -bigger hitbox -b...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.24 21:10:00
|
5120. Why doesn't anyone think logistics needs a buff? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Logi's should get their buff but it should not be to survivability or fitting power. Logi need a role bonus change so that every Logi can use the repair tool or shield transporter with increased efficiency and range. A log...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.07.24 20:55:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |