| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
3221. CCP LOGIBRO - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: recanted ..u guys should really rethink which terrible thread you reference when you agree with people Well they link the thread because its the source of the suggestion/complaint, even if its a bad one. It doesn't necessa...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.27 17:38:00
|
3222. CCP LOGIBRO - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Relax. He's simply linking it in response to that thread, but if you actually read the comment under the link he clearly states that they'll be changing the bonuses, not the weapons, to balance the Logi...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.27 17:35:00
|
3223. CCP LOGIBRO - in General Discussions [original thread]
Relax. He's simply linking it in response to that thread, but if you actually read the comment under the link he clearly states that they'll be changing the bonuses, not the weapons, to balance the Logistics suit. Ya'll need to be less knee-jerk...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.27 17:31:00
|
3224. So in the unlikely event that.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Same explanation they use for everything, Nanites!
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.27 17:30:00
|
3225. Rather than sidearm-only logis... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Looks like the OP read chapter 2 of my ADS report... original post is almost copied from my Logistics section. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1520867#post1520867
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.27 17:19:00
|
3226. All Logibros and Logichicks Listen Up - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well giving Logi's bonuses that allow them perform a support role BETTER is obviously a good thing, that's what they're talking about. In addition Assault bonuses need to be reworked so that Assault is clearly the obvious choice when it comes to ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.27 17:17:00
|
3227. CCP, you can't play stupid. - in General Discussions [original thread]
"You are re balancing tanks, therefor you're all going to hell" I love the nerd rage.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.27 07:22:00
|
3228. From an ignorant perspective...what is happening here...? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Audrey2 wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: People purchased AUR with Real World Money People used said AUR to buy BPO modules for vehicles. CCP decided to remove those modules entirely from the game. Because the modules are being removed, so are ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.26 02:34:00
|
3229. From an ignorant perspective...what is happening here...? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SponkSponkSponk wrote: I can see their concern; one reason I bought the veteran pack was for the blueprints, and if those blueprints just became vanity skins for stuff I would be forced to buy with isk anyway, I would feel somewhat ripped off ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.26 01:41:00
|
3230. From an ignorant perspective...what is happening here...? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Midas Fool wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: People purchased AUR with Real World Money People used said AUR to buy BPO modules for vehicles. CCP decided to remove those modules entirely from the game. Because the modules are being removed, so a...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.26 01:38:00
|
3231. From an ignorant perspective...what is happening here...? - in General Discussions [original thread]
People purchased AUR with Real World Money People used said AUR to buy BPO modules for vehicles. CCP decided to remove those modules entirely from the game. Because the modules are being removed, so are the BPOs. CCP is refunding everyone with...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.26 01:30:00
|
3232. SHIELD AND ARMOR BALANCE - in General Discussions [original thread]
ACE OF JOKERS wrote: Why is Armor tanking now so popular .WHAT CHANGED? is it the HP buff they gave them? NO. Is the ridiculously low Speed penalties. so now we have logis being as resiliant as a heavy but running at 6.1. AM i the only one...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.24 22:34:00
|
3233. BPOs, don't remove them. - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP needs to be less afraid of pissing its players off. People will always ***** about everything, you can't make everyone happy. So you either just listen to everything the players say they want, and the game fails like MAG. Or you stick to your ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.24 18:42:00
|
3234. Medium Frame Logic - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well all things considered the SMG is essentially a Mini HMG. High fire rate, low damage, large magazine, longish reload time.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.24 18:28:00
|
3235. Question about the LLAV (Concerning removal) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Honestly I wouldn't consider the rep tool "working properly". Granted it 'worked' but was harder to use than an infantry repair tool. Hopefully we'll see more improvements to that in the future.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.23 02:56:00
|
3236. Question regarding the new rifles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Hopefully it should be done eventually. Eventually? Geeze that's even worse than a Soon (tm) Great idea though, not top priority but its good immersion! They'll get to it eventually.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.23 02:22:00
|
3237. Response on legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: Even when they've benefited from other gamers standing up for their consumer rights, they still turn on their own and lick CCPs prostate like a golden gobstopper. This whole playerbase is a cancer. I guess I'm just n...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.23 02:18:00
|
3238. Even if vehicles are balanced in 1.7... - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: 1.7 will be the death of fit diversity, even if vehicles become more durable and reliable. Here's hoping we see additional roles and meta levels after 1.7 Sad but true. We can only hope that the low fitting option is eviden...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.22 23:57:00
|
3239. Even if vehicles are balanced in 1.7... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ninjanomyx wrote: & then you wonder why you're the running joke of New Eden........ Right, in comparison to everything you've personally done for the community.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.22 23:36:00
|
3240. Light weapon respecs with 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why would they do an infantry respec now when the racial dropsuits are very likely coming in 1.8? People would spend their points and then want ANOTHER respec because they've decided to go Gallente Sentinel. Best to wait till racial variants of su...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2013.11.22 19:20:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |