Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
8213
BIG BAD W0LVES
848
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 07:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
1.7 is going to cause a huge outcry from the community.
Tanks did not need any help on the battlefield. SCRs did not need a range increase.
How many times are you going to just ignore us CCP? We have more experience in the FPS community than you, so why is it that you simply ignore us and hand us excuses?
And to have the audacity to be pretengious about listening to us and appointing something as foolish as a CPM is simply disgusting. You have shown yourself to be unethical time, and time again. Everyone who works for you is truly a bad person.
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
5511
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 07:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
8213 wrote: Tanks did not need any help on the battlefield
Opinion.
Also, shield tanks are hilariously bad compared to armour tanks at the moment. That justifies a rebalancing.
Level 5 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
Supporter of CCP raRaRa.
|
Leovarian L Lavitz
NECROM0NGERS Covert Intervention
804
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 07:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
8213 wrote:1.7 is going to cause a huge outcry from the community.
Tanks did not need any help on the battlefield. SCRs did not need a range increase.
How many times are you going to just ignore us CCP? We have more experience in the FPS community than you, so why is it that you simply ignore us and hand us excuses?
And to have the audacity to be pretengious about listening to us and appointing something as foolish as a CPM is simply disgusting. You have shown yourself to be unethical time, and time again. Everyone who works for you is truly a bad person.
In other news, flaylocks have been rebuffed.
Leovarian, reporting from the Onion.
Omni-Soldier
Few are my equal in one of these specialties, and there are none who can compare in all of them.
|
Eris Ernaga
State Patriots
797
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 07:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
8213 wrote:1.7 is going to cause a huge outcry from the community.
Tanks did not need any help on the battlefield. SCRs did not need a range increase.
How many times are you going to just ignore us CCP? We have more experience in the FPS community than you, so why is it that you simply ignore us and hand us excuses?
And to have the audacity to be pretengious about listening to us and appointing something as foolish as a CPM is simply disgusting. You have shown yourself to be unethical time, and time again. Everyone who works for you is truly a bad person.
What a downer, my negative post address issues with the game I don't sit on the forums throwing personal insults trying to feel big about my self. Stop acting like you can do a better job at designing the game then CCP because hell I can't even do that. QQ more it's not helping the game get better.
For Caldari and Amarr faction warfare join State Patriots and help us on the front.
|
Heathen Bastard
The Bastard Brigade
718
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 07:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
yep, the "fancy coffin" tanks needed no help, and the "only slightly edges out the AR" SCR didn't need range, despite lasers having orders of magnitude more range than blasters.
It's going to be a huge outcry from you, and the AR 'tards who can't adapt. everyone else, will adapt, kill, and die.
If you hear the words "WORTH IT!" look about, something hilarious just happened.
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
1085
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 07:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
"You are re balancing tanks, therefor you're all going to hell"
I love the nerd rage.
ADS Reports - Defining Racial Themes
|
Viktor Hadah Jr
Critical-Impact
1246
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 07:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
I'm going to be swimming in minimatar tears when 1.7 hits. That scram rifle range buff is just ridiculous.
My last match i went 44/4, i can't even image the horror when i get an extra 20 meters to my optimal range...
For the Empire
Dual tanking is a sin
BPO's are bad for economy, Respec's are bad for the game. Want to fight about it?
|
hgghyujh
Expert Intervention Caldari State
174
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 07:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
frankly the problem is not that ccp is ignoring us its that they their ignoring filters are either ****** up, or they have a road map that they really need to share with us.
stupidity or long term planning I'm not sure which it is. Actually stupidity is unkind I blame it more on too much work too few personnel. |
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
410
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 07:44:00 -
[9] - Quote
8213 wrote:And to have the audacity to be pretengious about listening to us...
The only one I can see being "pretentious" here is you. I happen to agree with a tank rebalance, and as I think that the weapons in this game are UP as far a rang goes, I see any range increase as a good thing.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
8213
BIG BAD W0LVES
849
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:yep, the "fancy coffin" tanks needed no help, and the "only slightly edges out the AR" SCR didn't need range, despite lasers having orders of magnitude more range than blasters.
It's going to be a huge outcry from you, and the AR 'tards who can't adapt. everyone else, will adapt, kill, and die.
Wow, you're just another ignorant f*ck on this board that naturally assumes that anyone who doesn't agree with something is a Scrub AR user. 1. I am a SCR user(80% of the time) 2. I am a Tanker(20% of the other time)
1.7 will personally help me the most. Even I know bullsh*t when I see it.
The only HAVs that got killed on the battlefield were stupid drivers. I lose 1 HAV about every 10 matches that I use them and I use them only if I'm confident. 99% of the time I get killed from an Orbital, or two, which I'll gladly take because the team just wasted an Orbital on one person not even near an objective most of them time.
SCRs are already the best light weapon in the game. My SCR can beat a AR any day. I get 40 kills games with it on a regular, now that I have 20m of reach I'll only get more. My record kill with an SCR is 178m... how the heck does a light weapon that's not a sniper even do damage at that range, now I can kill people at 200m? People already can't stand up to my SCR, now that I have range, my hate mail is going to shoot through the roof.
I don't need 1.7, because I'm actually good at the game and can use my brain. And last I checked, I didn't hear ANYBODY ask for a SCR buff of any kind, the only thing I hear about it is it needs a nerf actually. And HAVs still rule on the battlefield, the numbers don't lie.
So, next time, before you assume, educate yourself you ignorant f*ck. |
|
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI
7242
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:14:00 -
[11] - Quote
This thread is unjustifiably whiny, and stupid.
Gû¦Gû+Supreme emperor god-kingpÇÉKAGEH¦PSHIpÇæ// Lord of the threads // Forum alt Gû¦Gû+
|
Jacques Cayton II
Providence Guard Templis Dragonaors
126
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:22:00 -
[12] - Quote
Nobody cares about the heavies -_- we don't have a long range anti - infantry heavy weapon. Excuse me while I hide around my free lav fort I'll be making in the red line afking so my heavy can survive with a heavy weapon. Oh and scouts your welcome to join me
We fight for the future of the State not our
personal goals
|
8213
BIG BAD W0LVES
850
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:24:00 -
[13] - Quote
Jacques Cayton II wrote:Nobody cares about the heavies -_- we don't have a long range anti - infantry heavy weapon. Excuse me while I hide around my free lav fort I'll be making in the red line afking so my heavy can survive with a heavy weapon. Oh and scouts your welcome to join me
Why would CCP care about that stuff? They only care about stuff they pull from their own imagination... |
8213
BIG BAD W0LVES
850
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:25:00 -
[14] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:This thread is unjustifiably whiny, and stupid.
How about we make a bet. 2 weeks into 1.7, lets see what the top threads on these forums are... |
Sir Petersen
Valhalla Nord
390
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:27:00 -
[15] - Quote
8213 wrote:
How many times are you going to just ignore us CCP?
So CCP should be listening to no life teenagers who cry over a videogame? |
Cat Merc
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
4059
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:28:00 -
[16] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:yep, the "fancy coffin" tanks needed no help, and the "only slightly edges out the AR" SCR didn't need range, despite lasers having orders of magnitude more range than blasters.
It's going to be a huge outcry from you, and the AR 'tards who can't adapt. everyone else, will adapt, kill, and die. If SCR's weren't OP before they will be with that range. I'm having a hard time deciding between the AR and SCR (leaning on SCR), but now I know for sure.
Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives.
|
I-Shayz-I
I-----I
1468
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:30:00 -
[17] - Quote
I think that with the range increase the weapon will do less damage at close range (similar to the laser rifle)....so this is actually a good change, not a bad one. Basically, you won't be able to spam SR rounds at shotgun distance anymore in order to get kills, which is something that is happening right now, causing most players to call the weapon OP.
Not to mention it's hard to hit anything past 60 meters because the SR only has a red dot sight, and the player model gets quite small after that since it doesn't exactly zoom on your target much. The Combat Rifle will then fill in the spot that the Scrambler used to hold, and the Rail Rifle will function more or less like a sniper/tactical (far zoom when ADS, very wide hip fire).
Links:
List of Important Topics
I make logistics videos!
|
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Dominion of the Supreme Emperor God-King KAGEHOSHI
7244
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:32:00 -
[18] - Quote
8213 wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:This thread is unjustifiably whiny, and stupid. How about we make a bet. 2 weeks into 1.7, lets see what the top threads on these forums are... How would that prove anything? 1.4 was a great patch, but people whined about it for like the first week nonstop. People always whine when big changes come, and big changes always have problems that need to be hotfixed or handled in the next patch, but ultimately they're good for the game. So yes, people will whine initially, but that doesn't mean the changes 1.7 will bring aren't needed.
The whininess of your thread is unjustified.
Gû¦Gû+Supreme emperor god-kingpÇÉKAGEH¦PSHIpÇæ// Lord of the threads // Forum alt Gû¦Gû+
|
8213
BIG BAD W0LVES
852
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:36:00 -
[19] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:8213 wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:This thread is unjustifiably whiny, and stupid. How about we make a bet. 2 weeks into 1.7, lets see what the top threads on these forums are... How would that prove anything? 1.4 was a great patch, but people whined about it for like the first week nonstop. People always whine when big changes come, and big changes always have problems that need to be hotfixed or handled in the next patch, but ultimately they're good for the game. So yes, people will whine initially, but that doesn't mean the changes 1.7 will bring aren't needed. The whininess of your thread is unjustified.
Alright, I'll up it to 6 weeks maybe more. Seeing is how people have been complaining on this forum about the AR for about a year now and CCP has ignored it, but goes right on ahead with patches that nobody asked for. |
THEAMAZING POTHEAD
Nyain San Renegade Alliance
589
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:47:00 -
[20] - Quote
i used my 500k SP ****** skilled but fitted optimized gunnlogi to dominate for a lot of matches today, felt good to mow down proto AVers 1 after the other because the hit detection on my STD scattered blaster was good. Never even lost my 450k crap tank. All because I played smart and the hit detection was good enough to take down AV.
Fix hit detection for blasters on infantry and tanks would skyrocket to uber OP mode. |
|
Broonfondle Majikthies
Bannana Boat Corp Relentless Heroes Alliance
500
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 08:58:00 -
[21] - Quote
Nobody plays dumb like me
My brain is so small my thoughts have an echo
"...where Bylothgar the Ill-postured was made King of the People With No Name But Decent Footwear"
|
Rusty Shallows
545
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 09:31:00 -
[22] - Quote
Jacques Cayton II wrote:Nobody cares about the heavies -_- we don't have a long range anti - infantry heavy weapon. Excuse me while I hide around my free lav fort I'll be making in the red line afking so my heavy can survive with a heavy weapon. Oh and scouts your welcome to join me Meh. The Devs will get around to us Fatties sooner or later. Since there hasn't been any indication of progress my hope 2.0 will flesh out Light & Heavy Frames like Uprising 1.0 did for Medium Frames.
If game play becomes too unbearable on the Fatty Main then I will be a Douche Berry in the red-line while watching Hulu.
Cat Merc wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:yep, the "fancy coffin" tanks needed no help, and the "only slightly edges out the AR" SCR didn't need range, despite lasers having orders of magnitude more range than blasters.
It's going to be a huge outcry from you, and the AR 'tards who can't adapt. everyone else, will adapt, kill, and die. If SCR's weren't OP before they will be with that range. I'm having a hard time deciding between the AR and SCR (leaning on SCR), but now I know for sure. Silly Kitty, get both! If the CR & RR turn out well I'm willing to bet the new game name will be Rifles 514.
"She may not be Miss Right but she'll do right now." SR-71
310k+ SP for +0.05m/s (>2in) on a Heavy. Totally worth it.
|
Leithe Askarii
Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State
41
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 09:36:00 -
[23] - Quote
8213 wrote:1.7 is going to cause a huge outcry from the community.
Tanks did not need any help on the battlefield. SCRs did not need a range increase.
How many times are you going to just ignore us CCP? We have more experience in the FPS community than you, so why is it that you simply ignore us and hand us excuses?
And to have the audacity to be pretengious about listening to us and appointing something as foolish as a CPM is simply disgusting. You have shown yourself to be unethical time, and time again. Everyone who works for you is truly a bad person.
Do we now? I just got three shot from an invisible force....... AKA invisible non rendered Wyirkomi SL...... |
R F Gyro
Clones 4u
680
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 10:43:00 -
[24] - Quote
Dear CCP - the OP in no way represents my views.
RF Gyro: 12.5% damage bonus; 10.5% rate of fire bonus
|
8213
BIG BAD W0LVES
855
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 11:06:00 -
[25] - Quote
Leithe Askarii wrote:8213 wrote:1.7 is going to cause a huge outcry from the community.
Tanks did not need any help on the battlefield. SCRs did not need a range increase.
How many times are you going to just ignore us CCP? We have more experience in the FPS community than you, so why is it that you simply ignore us and hand us excuses?
And to have the audacity to be pretengious about listening to us and appointing something as foolish as a CPM is simply disgusting. You have shown yourself to be unethical time, and time again. Everyone who works for you is truly a bad person.
Do we now? I just got three shot from an invisible force....... AKA invisible non rendered Wyirkomi SL......
And after 1.7 invisible Swarms will STILL get you, and the people you're shooting at will STILL disappear, and the shots you fire will STILL not register on targets. The problem with Tanks is mechanical. This overhaul of the Vehicle Skill Tree and AV nerf is just a COVER UP from CCP so they don't have to actually fix anything.
We've been asking for our Tank problems to be fixed for over a year now, and still NOTHING. Because CCP ignores the community and puts in patches they conjure out of their own imagination.
I've posted my re-occurring Tank problems on the Support Forum for months, and still I never got so much as an answer of awareness. I must have 10 threads on their about the same 2 problems. |
dustwaffle
Xer Cloud Consortium
687
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 11:46:00 -
[26] - Quote
8213 wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:This thread is unjustifiably whiny, and stupid. How about we make a bet. 2 weeks into 1.7, lets see what the top threads on these forums are... Probably your whine threads |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |