| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
281. Redline Activities Should Result in Zero WP Gain - in General Discussions [original thread]
Saxbrin Shain wrote: Make it work both ways: No WP earned for kills behind a redline. Period. That would discourage players from sitting behind a redline all game, but it would also discourage teams from pushing their opponents into the redlin...
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.27 19:52:00
|
282. Redline Activities Should Result in Zero WP Gain - in General Discussions [original thread]
Foundation Seldon wrote: YEAH! Players should NOT be rewarded for losing all their points against the team of enemy protos and having to fight tooth and nail to even leave the redline to begin with. Instead, we should leave the match. Stop...
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.27 19:50:00
|
283. Dear CCP, regarding events requiring a win... - in General Discussions [original thread]
make friends
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.27 17:13:00
|
284. Quit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eris Ernaga wrote: this game like 2 - 3 weeks ago and have found no updates not even on 1.8 from CCP god is this how slow this game was moving? You'd think there was a holiday or two or something...
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.27 17:12:00
|
285. An idea to perhaps making excessive proto stomping less attractive (tiered warpo... - in General Discussions [original thread]
No. Tiericide of gear is the answer.
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.27 17:09:00
|
286. Purposed Active Scanner Adjustments - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: On the grounds of no new content I purpose these changes. 1. Active Scanners will rely on suit or vehicle own natural sensors to find targets. Better the natural sensors the better it can find ...
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.26 18:20:00
|
287. Purposed Active Scanner Adjustments - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Heres what Ive told Kane: Scanners provide a snapshot. Essentially they tell you where someone was at the moment they were scanned. 360 degree scans will still be possible, but itll no longer be possible to track someone thr...
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.26 18:05:00
|
288. How the active scanner should work - in General Discussions [original thread]
Stillbroken
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.26 18:01:00
|
289. Just make active scanner deployable. - in General Discussions [original thread]
you think equipment spam is bad now....
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.26 13:03:00
|
290. A VOTE FOR FULL RESPECT (Yay or Nay) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Once we get all of the basic racial suits.
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.25 16:24:00
|
291. Purposed Active Scanner Adjustments - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heres what Ive told Kane: Scanners provide a snapshot. Essentially they tell you where someone was at the moment they were scanned. 360 degree scans will still be possible, but itll no longer be possible to track someone through walls. The scan w...
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.25 15:23:00
|
292. GOD F*CKING DAM!@#$%^&*( - in General Discussions [original thread]
Anmol Singh wrote: F*CK REDLINE RAILGUN TURRETS, F*CK MISSILE TURRETS WITH MOTHER F*CKING UNLIMITED GOD DAM RANGE! F*CK THE RAILGUN BUFF, F*CK THEIR RATE OF F*CKING FIRE!!! F*CK THIS GAME! CAN'T EVEN FLY A GOD DAM F*CKING PYTHON WITHOUT GETTING...
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.24 21:33:00
|
293. RR is EZ mode - in General Discussions [original thread]
std RR is somehow better than proto ACR in CQC.
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.24 06:14:00
|
294. if a tank should only be killed by a tank..... - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheBLAZZED wrote: What would stop a red dot from nonchalantly strolling up and slapping a bunch of remote explosives on you? Support infantry
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.22 15:43:00
|
295. CCP is being too quiet about 1.8... - in General Discussions [original thread]
1. holidays 2. there is no 1.8. Next big expansion in the next couple months probably.
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.21 18:04:00
|
296. 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Its not. The next big expansion is. Get ready.
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.21 17:16:00
|
297. Discussion on balancing red line rail tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heathen Bastard wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: Just don't allow for any sp wp or isk gained from actions in your own red line Good idea, dissincentivise redliners in general, this would help to curb red line snipers as wel...
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.21 13:58:00
|
298. Proto Elites running FW together? Really! - in General Discussions [original thread]
SHOOOOTER wrote: You guys have Planetary Conquest why are you guys running in FW? It was BS! A team of Imperfects, AE, TeamPlayers and a few others fighting for Amarr? i thought you guys were fighting in PC. Camping spawn points really! ...
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.21 13:57:00
|
299. Discussion on balancing red line rail tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just don't allow for any sp wp or isk gained from actions in your own red line
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.21 02:04:00
|
300. Chicks in dust. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Logi Bro wrote: Not sure what's worse....the OP thinking that he would be able to get away with this thread flame-free or the fact that people will get outraged at just about anything. If you didn't like the thread, maybe you shouldn't have pos...
- by Paran Tadec - at 2013.12.20 20:26:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |