| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
2801. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Vermaak Doe wrote: So segregating graduates and drop outs is the only way for things go to work when there are wayys around it already? You need 8 guys for a corp battle, there's 2 guys equally good at infantry, but only ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 22:15:00
|
2802. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Anyone who wanted to use guns would be using guns in IO Anyone who wanted to blow up tanks with gear that cost 1000x less than the tanks would join the other ambush. Anyone who wanted to lose their tank ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 22:14:00
|
2803. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vermaak Doe wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: gbghg wrote: The only way noobs become AV people who know what they're doing is by going up against tanks, willingly or not. I never learned how to sow, you going to force me to learn how to sow? W...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 21:51:00
|
2804. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: yeah... And you're proving my point that if you eliminate rock from rock paper scissors which is FINE. Then you end up with paper scissors which is inherently broken . Why would anyone switch to paper ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 21:22:00
|
2805. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vermaak Doe wrote: No one mentioned Italian food even though I was eating spaghetti not long ago I really got a hankering for chipotle reading this thread. Not sure why,
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 21:20:00
|
2806. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: It essentially would when you look at the prices. AV (cheap) as in free-tens of thousands. Vehicles. Effectively range from 500k-million ISK ds and 1-3 million ISk tanks. Tell me, what idiot will cal...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 21:16:00
|
2807. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Obviously all this will do is create a game mode of AV vs Tanks. And gun-infantry vs gun-infantry. See the problem? The rock paper scissors here is Infantry --> AV --> Tanks --> Infantry No...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 21:10:00
|
2808. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Um. Are you suggesting every video game should cater to a crown of people who choose to completely ignore every mechanic and aspect of that game? Oh no! The a...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 21:04:00
|
2809. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Vermaak Doe wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: Vermaak Doe wrote: Then why would we need to separate by weapons? Because why not? Split the player base? Skirmish and the eventual PVE will already do that. You're that guy tell...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 21:02:00
|
2810. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Um. Are you suggesting every video game should cater to a crown of people who choose to completely ignore every mechanic and aspect of that game? Oh no! The average World of Warcraft player is too stup...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 20:56:00
|
2811. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: I read through all these comments and still can't figure out why people have a problem with a different game mode... you know you still have a choice to select the game mode right? Losing faith in this community dai...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 20:55:00
|
2812. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Vermaak Doe wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: Gunner Nightingale wrote: I ADAPT OR DIE HTFU That's nice, but noobs don't have the option to adapt, because like you said, they lack the SP. Newberries are the only people who ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 20:51:00
|
2813. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: You do realize that CCP would likely give us such maps as "an option" just like being able to choose between Ambush, Ambush OMS, and Skirmish, correct? Let's extend that. Say I don't like to play against snipers? MORE CHOI...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 20:49:00
|
2814. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Winscar Shinobi wrote: You want the freedom to be diverse and drive your ship, but won't respect the freedom of others to want to play a mode where vehicles don't roll over them? Let's be honest here. What you're complaining against isn't v...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 19:58:00
|
2815. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
That's just what this games needs. A game with specialization and variety of skills to be broken apart into subsets. Now I have never driven a tank and never want to. However look at this from my perspective as a DS pilot. If I want to use my dro...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 19:30:00
|
2816. Favorite thing: Killing Tanks, Second: Dropshps - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: That comes under murderous bolas's OOh okay. They have so many methods Its frightful.
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 05:37:00
|
2817. Favorite thing: Killing Tanks, Second: Dropshps - in General Discussions [original thread]
Wait! Also how did you forget RDV's simply crashing into you in the air when they're coming or going? There's no stopping it. New Eden wants pilots all dead or rage quitting.
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 05:06:00
|
2818. Favorite thing: Killing Tanks, Second: Dropshps - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vyzion Eyri wrote: So in addition to current AV users, Murderous Bolas', Pollen in the air, Lampposts, Rough terrain, Mountains, Buildings, Crazy LAVs, Blaster HAVs, Bolas' which deploy in the redzone, Bolas' which deploy on its side, Bolas' wh...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 05:05:00
|
2819. What happened to that dev blog? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: I copied the txt... but I'm afraid if I post it here I'll get banned... It's a good read though. My skype isn't d00dwtf and this isn't another forum for Dust on...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.22 21:20:00
|
2820. What happened to that dev blog? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: I copied the txt... but I'm afraid if I post it here I'll get banned... It's a good read though. My skype isn't d00dwtf and this isn't another forum for Dust on reddit. http://www.reddit.com/r/dust514/ 0.-
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.22 21:07:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |