DUST Search - LOL, about those supply depots in 1.7

All Channels

General Discussions

LOL, about those supply depots in 1.7

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Nguruthos IX PEN 15 CLUB 2280	Posted - 2013.11.21 03:32:00 - [31] - Quote Why destory it? Just camp from beyond render distance with a forge gun and 2 shot every stationary dropship that is forced back to the same 5 cubed feet area
Xocoyol Zaraoul Superior Genetics 1496	Posted - 2013.11.21 03:33:00 - [32] - Quote If an enemy supply depot is in a critical position where an AV squad can utilize it and cover a large/important swath of area, I'll destroy it without hesitation if my friendly infantry can't capture it, even if people start giving me arbitrary ammo restrictions. This stands even if "calling/recalling" does not work for restocking ammo. If it needs to be removed on the battlefield, I'll remove it. If people are not going to adapt for my play style, I refuse to adapt to theirs. Fair is fair. Closed Beta Vet Reading the forums detracts from overall enjoyment of the game
ACE OF JOKERS AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS 149	Posted - 2013.11.21 03:35:00 - [33] - Quote Marston VC wrote: Do you guys think infantry will destroy the supply depots just to troll tank drivers in 1.7? Kind of like how they do that to us these days? I think it would be some sort of karma if we did. Oh waitttttttt they can just recall the vehicle anyway...... YUP. RECALL VEHICLE NEEDS TO GO.
castba Penguin's March 216	Posted - 2013.11.21 03:35:00 - [34] - Quote Marston VC wrote: I just realized this, but couldn't tankers just recall their vehicles to counter the cool down effects after using a module? So instead of waiting a minute, they can just recall a vehicle and have it on full reps again? Not sure if it would be efficient or not cuz I haven't looked at the new cool down timers yet, but the thought just occurred to me is all. Perhaps if HAVs and LAVs needed to be at or near a supply depot to recall like infantry need to? OR, preferably, recalled vehicles have to wait for an RDV to come in, pick the vehicle up and carry it out (none of this magical evaporation we currently have)? Increasing the risk and strategic element of recalling a vehicle would minimise these concerns, no? I Support SP Rollover
Xocoyol Zaraoul Superior Genetics 1496	Posted - 2013.11.21 03:37:00 - [35] - Quote ACE OF JOKERS wrote: Marston VC wrote: Do you guys think infantry will destroy the supply depots just to troll tank drivers in 1.7? Kind of like how they do that to us these days? I think it would be some sort of karma if we did. Oh waitttttttt they can just recall the vehicle anyway...... YUP. RECALL VEHICLE NEEDS TO GO. Then you need to implement another mechanic to get rid of unwanted/damaged vehicles, as infantry already possess this ability with supply depots. I'm a firm defender of being able to recall vehicles, though I'd love to have it where RDVs pick them up and fly off with them instead of the magic deconstruction. Closed Beta Vet Reading the forums detracts from overall enjoyment of the game
Eurydice Itzhak Militaires Sans Jeux 242	Posted - 2013.11.21 03:54:00 - [36] - Quote Atiim wrote: I destroy anything that the enemy has, both Supply Depots and Mobile CRUs. I personally think that if a tank gets recalled, they should have the same amount of ammunition from the last time. Otherwise we'd have tankers who recall their tanks, call it back in 15-20 seconds later, spam, rinse, and repeat. Without this, the whole Supply Depot "mechanic" with HAVs is going to be nonexistent. Is there really any difference waiting 30 seconds for a new tank and driving 15 seconds back to a supply depot?
Roger Cordill The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 11	Posted - 2013.11.21 03:56:00 - [37] - Quote Marston VC wrote: Do you guys think infantry will destroy the supply depots just to troll tank drivers in 1.7? Kind of like how they do that to us these days? I think it would be some sort of karma if we did. Oh waitttttttt they can just recall the vehicle anyway...... There's always one in the base, and most of the time (especially in 1.7), they'll run out of ammo before that happens.
ACE OF JOKERS AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS 149	Posted - 2013.11.21 04:06:00 - [38] - Quote Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: ACE OF JOKERS wrote: Marston VC wrote: Do you guys think infantry will destroy the supply depots just to troll tank drivers in 1.7? Kind of like how they do that to us these days? I think it would be some sort of karma if we did. Oh waitttttttt they can just recall the vehicle anyway...... YUP. RECALL VEHICLE NEEDS TO GO. Then you need to implement another mechanic to get rid of unwanted/damaged vehicles, as infantry already possess this ability with supply depots. I'm a firm defender of being able to recall vehicles, though I'd love to have it where RDVs pick them up and fly off with them instead of the magic deconstruction. No. If i change my Amarr suit to another amar of the same type its still going to be damaged. I can change to ANOTHER SUIT,but not the same one. The Vehicle recall lets you send a maddy back and get a new one while NOT loosing the previous one. Damaged vehicles? Get a repair tool then or you know, play as a team with people with reppers? (I know tankers want to do everything themselves but...) Or make it the same as with dropsutis. You must request a DIFFERENT vehicle because if you call the same type it will come back in the same stage you recalled it...you see? same as dropsuits... IMO if vehicle recall stays the tank or vehicle must be at least at 75 % HP and they need to wait a SERIOUS cooldown to call in anotehr vehicle, say 3 minutes.... Im tired of that: ''ooh i got hit twice by a Breach forge gunner while staying still like a dumbsit, LOL no problem, pump that afterburner ,recall my tank and have a new one in 30 secs, YOLO..'' Who needs that noise...**
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui Kinsho Swords Caldari State 108	Posted - 2013.11.21 04:09:00 - [39] - Quote I'm going to destroy EVERY STORAGE DEPOT , friend and foe . Gatsun's to the head when I see some one calling a tank , I will wittle down the enemy's tank down and then let them destroy the tank that I stole only to hop out with my Gatsun and blast that tank to dust and clean up the mess with my Boundless SMG . I'm going to make all vehicle drivers lives a living hell !!!! I will go down as the most wanted man in the Dust 514 ( New Eden ) universe for A.V.ing and killing vehicles . Trust me ... protect your storage depots and steering columns . All prototype Forge Gun's , A.V. grenades , Swarm Launchers and Plasma Cannons . I'm using my SP's from my vehicles like a tax return . Watch your backs in FW teammates . My standing will be so high I will be able to kill my own team's vehicle drivers and steal their vehicle's and still play the next match only to do the same thing all over again . I'm going to wreak your vehicle's like GTA the Dust 514 way !!!!!!! Making vehicles turn into Dust and Burn !!!!!!!! If I can't enjoy myself NO ONE WILL !!!!!! THIS WILL BE MY ENJOYMENT .... Shinobi Mumyo Sakanagare ZaShigurui : A.K.A " BANE " . DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE 1.7 DIE ALREADY !!!!!!! " BANE " of ALL vehicle users , Crush , Kill and Destroy ALL vehicles !!!!!
Zero Harpuia Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance 1207	Posted - 2013.11.21 04:19:00 - [40] - Quote Zelorian Dexter snr wrote: Borne Velvalor wrote: Atiim wrote: Vyzion Eyri wrote: Just need to buff supply depots to CRU hp and give it the ability to regenerate armour. I mean, if it can regenerate armour of vehicles why not itself? If it's a pain to destroy and takes a tank too long, people should just leave them alone and play strategically around them. "Strategically?" You mean recall everytime they run out of ammo and simply call the tank back in 20 seconds later. How about having allied ground forces actually capture the damn thing instead of blowing it away? EDIT: Also, recalls for health are a problem. However, if I see a HAV being recalled for ammo I'll swap to a Forge Gun and blow the RDV out of the sky. But blowing **** up is so much fun ... (solid minute of railgun firing) We're out of ammo, is the SD dead yet? Half health. ...goddammit. Having fun yet? :3 Shields as Weapons

ACE OF JOKERS AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS 154	Posted - 2013.11.21 04:22:00 - [41] - Quote PLUS YOU PEOPLE MUST ADMIT,it will be fun playing with supply depos for once. Im tired of Tanks always destroying them to deny enemy players to take out their AV stuff and fight on an equal ground...muehehehe...
CharCharOdell 1611	Posted - 2013.11.21 04:56:00 - [42] - Quote Atiim wrote: Borne Velvalor wrote: Atiim wrote: Vyzion Eyri wrote: Just need to buff supply depots to CRU hp and give it the ability to regenerate armour. I mean, if it can regenerate armour of vehicles why not itself? If it's a pain to destroy and takes a tank too long, people should just leave them alone and play strategically around them. "Strategically?" You mean recall everytime they run out of ammo and simply call the tank back in 20 seconds later. How about have allied ground force actually capture the damn thing instead of blowing it away? EDIT: Also, recalls for health are a problem. However, if I see a HAV being recalled for ammo I'll swap to a Forge Gun and blow the RDV out of the sky. Infantry usually does capture the supply depot. The enemy team just destroys it. Yeah lol okay and when the LOLTank Brigade gets FGs nerfed what are you gonna do? What you said was highly irrelevant and didn't even partially contribute to solving the problem I stated. tankers dont want forge guns nerfed because we respect them as marksman...you know, because they have to work for their kills unlike lolswarms and yolonade lovers. Gùñ-é-º+¼+ò+¦GÖÑ+ú+ú+¡ GÖÑ'Ðe+ü+üGùÑ Gùú -ä>-üð+++Ç++§<-¡<-¡ Gùó Speaker of the Mangrove / King of QQ / Co-Founder of the Learning Coalition
CharCharOdell 1611	Posted - 2013.11.21 04:57:00 - [43] - Quote ACE OF JOKERS wrote: PLUS YOU PEOPLE MUST ADMIT,it will be fun playing with supply depos for once. Im tired of Tanks always destroying them to deny enemy players to take out their AV stuff and fight on an equal ground...muehehehe... ill still blow them up anyway bc trails and missiles have more ammo than ill use in a game, anyway. Gùñ-é-º+¼+ò+¦GÖÑ+ú+ú+¡ GÖÑ'Ðe+ü+üGùÑ Gùú -ä>-üð+++Ç++§<-¡<-¡ Gùó Speaker of the Mangrove / King of QQ / Co-Founder of the Learning Coalition
Tesfa Alem Death by Disassociation Zero-Day 19	Posted - 2013.11.21 06:58:00 - [44] - Quote Marston VC wrote: Do you guys think infantry will destroy the supply depots just to troll tank drivers in 1.7? Kind of like how they do that to us these days? I think it would be some sort of karma if we did. Oh waitttttttt they can just recall the vehicle anyway...... Infantry manning rail turrets - oops i meanTanks - blowing up red installations? Perish the thought! *I fly I shoot I rep I tank/ Heavy, Scout, Assault and Logi at range/ I'm the Jack of all trades/ Master of Some
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 1233	Posted - 2013.11.21 13:53:00 - [45] - Quote Skihids wrote: Today's armies have support vehicles that resupply tanks. Adding that to the game would increase strategic play and make HAVs less a solo act. Make a module for Logistics LAVs Check out my corp's new website here :D -HAND
jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 117	Posted - 2013.11.21 14:08:00 - [46] - Quote ACE OF JOKERS wrote: PLUS YOU PEOPLE MUST ADMIT,it will be fun playing with supply depos for once. Im tired of Tanks always destroying them to deny enemy players to take out their AV stuff and fight on an equal ground...muehehehe... how is abusing proto av being on equal ground? recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
knight of 6 SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 670	Posted - 2013.11.21 14:10:00 - [47] - Quote Recall and drop a new one. "God favors the side with the best artillery" ~ Napoleon Ko6, scout, tanker. CLOSED BETA VET
jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 117	Posted - 2013.11.21 14:13:00 - [48] - Quote "tankers dont want forge guns nerfed because we respect them as marksman...you know, because they have to work for their kills" am i on crack? i think im stoned off my ass. hitting a BIG target with a forge is sooo easy, because it's big, forge gun shells travel too fast, and the dmg, is just,....very high, especially from accross the map, or on a tower denying the whole map from vehicles. i have ZERO respect for forge gunners, especially when i use a dropship recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
CharCharOdell 1616	Posted - 2013.11.21 19:53:00 - [49] - Quote jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: "tankers dont want forge guns nerfed because we respect them as marksman...you know, because they have to work for their kills" am i on crack? i think im stoned off my ass. hitting a BIG target with a forge is sooo easy, because it's big, forge gun shells travel too fast, and the dmg, is just,....very high, especially from accross the map, or on a tower denying the whole map from vehicles. i have ZERO respect for forge gunners, especially when i use a dropship Your fault for thinking drop ships are a good idea. Gùñ-é-º+¼+ò+¦GÖÑ+ú+ú+¡ GÖÑ'Ðe+ü+üGùÑ Gùú -ä>-üð+++Ç++§<-¡<-¡ Gùó Speaker of the Mangrove / King of QQ / Co-Founder of the Learning Coalition
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui Kinsho Swords Caldari State 109	Posted - 2013.11.21 20:21:00 - [50] - Quote jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: "tankers dont want forge guns nerfed because we respect them as marksman...you know, because they have to work for their kills" am i on crack? i think im stoned off my ass. hitting a BIG target with a forge is sooo easy, because it's big, forge gun shells travel too fast, and the dmg, is just,....very high, especially from accross the map, or on a tower denying the whole map from vehicles. i have ZERO respect for forge gunners, especially when i use a dropship I know that you respect Forge Gunners but they can cause you trouble . I know you meant it differently . " BANE " of ALL vehicle users , Crush , Kill and Destroy ALL vehicles !!!!!

Nova Knife Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 2136	Posted - 2013.11.21 20:44:00 - [51] - Quote When CCP first told us about ammo... This was a huge red flag we raised. We strongly cautioned them not to implement ammo without the proper support: meaning pkayers should have some way to get more supply depots at a cost, and recalling and redpolying should not be possible to get more ammo for free. vOv
Marston VC SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1270	Posted - 2013.11.21 23:13:00 - [52] - Quote Nova Knife wrote: When CCP first told us about ammo... This was a huge red flag we raised. We strongly cautioned them not to implement ammo without the proper support: meaning pkayers should have some way to get more supply depots at a cost, and recalling and redpolying should not be possible to get more ammo for free. vOv Yeah, I do wish CCP could have waited on this a bit. Being able to call in installations for a price would have been amazing, and Im not sure if I understand why they couldn't have done it. I mean...... it would be fairly similar to calling in a vehicle. 1.) right directional button, 2.) select installations, 3.) select specific installation, 4.) a "ghost" copy of that installation appears on screen and you select where you want it to land via beacon. Step 5.) Profit........ Starting off with supply depots would have been a good way to get into this stuff and im honestly shocked this feature hasn't been added into the game yet considering how long the "installation" option has been in the game. And naturally theres a ton of ways CCP could spin off it this too! They could have standard SD's like what we have in game, and they could also have more expensive, personalized SD's that you can recall if you choose to. Obviously there would be limits in place to prevent people from abusing it, but having a feature like this would help make the game much more deep and immersive IMO. But hey! Why use common sense right? Marston VC, STB director
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 1243	Posted - 2013.11.22 00:41:00 - [53] - Quote ACE OF JOKERS wrote: Marston VC wrote: Do you guys think infantry will destroy the supply depots just to troll tank drivers in 1.7? Kind of like how they do that to us these days? I think it would be some sort of karma if we did. Oh waitttttttt they can just recall the vehicle anyway...... YUP. RECALL VEHICLE NEEDS TO GO. That's insane. I hope you were being sarcastic. Check out my corp's new website here :D -HAND
True Adamance PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 4212	Posted - 2013.11.22 00:44:00 - [54] - Quote Atiim wrote: Vyzion Eyri wrote: Just need to buff supply depots to CRU hp and give it the ability to regenerate armour. I mean, if it can regenerate armour of vehicles why not itself? If it's a pain to destroy and takes a tank too long, people should just leave them alone and play strategically around them. "Strategically?" You mean recall everytime they run out of ammo and simply call the tank back in 20 seconds later. Puts down Nano Hive "Hur hur hur" "All things were created by the Divine, and so the glory of our faith is inherent to us all"
True Adamance PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 4212	Posted - 2013.11.22 00:45:00 - [55] - Quote CharCharOdell wrote: Atiim wrote: Borne Velvalor wrote: Atiim wrote: Vyzion Eyri wrote: Just need to buff supply depots to CRU hp and give it the ability to regenerate armour. I mean, if it can regenerate armour of vehicles why not itself? If it's a pain to destroy and takes a tank too long, people should just leave them alone and play strategically around them. "Strategically?" You mean recall everytime they run out of ammo and simply call the tank back in 20 seconds later. How about have allied ground force actually capture the damn thing instead of blowing it away? EDIT: Also, recalls for health are a problem. However, if I see a HAV being recalled for ammo I'll swap to a Forge Gun and blow the RDV out of the sky. Infantry usually does capture the supply depot. The enemy team just destroys it. Yeah lol okay and when the LOLTank Brigade gets FGs nerfed what are you gonna do? What you said was highly irrelevant and didn't even partially contribute to solving the problem I stated. tankers dont want forge guns nerfed because we respect them as marksman...you know, because they have to work for their kills unlike lolswarms and yolonade lovers. I always cherish the comments you make O'Dell....always gives me a laugh. "All things were created by the Divine, and so the glory of our faith is inherent to us all"
Nguruthos IX PEN 15 CLUB 2313	Posted - 2013.11.22 00:46:00 - [56] - Quote CharCharOdell wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: "tankers dont want forge guns nerfed because we respect them as marksman...you know, because they have to work for their kills" am i on crack? i think im stoned off my ass. hitting a BIG target with a forge is sooo easy, because it's big, forge gun shells travel too fast, and the dmg, is just,....very high, especially from accross the map, or on a tower denying the whole map from vehicles. i have ZERO respect for forge gunners, especially when i use a dropship Your fault for thinking drop ships are a good idea. far be it from CCP to balance their game
Nguruthos IX PEN 15 CLUB 2313	Posted - 2013.11.22 00:47:00 - [57] - Quote Nova Knife wrote: When CCP first told us about ammo... This was a huge red flag we raised. We strongly cautioned them not to implement ammo without the proper support: meaning pkayers should have some way to get more supply depots at a cost, and recalling and redpolying should not be possible to get more ammo for free. vOv And CCP went right on ahead anyways. I marvel at their thickness sometimes. In the most negative way possible. Like, holy **** how?
Nguruthos IX PEN 15 CLUB 2316	Posted - 2013.11.22 00:50:00 - [58] - Quote Why the hell didn't they just make it so the logi variants of LAVs and DS have a passive Ammo restore Aura around them. For which they get points like a nanohive Playing resupply DS/LAV could be fun, driving or flying to tanks, mid air rondevu restocking before going back into combat. Protecting the logi LAV/ship from other AV and vehicles. Nah, lets all swarm cluster f*** around the tiny supply depot, crash into each other, get camped by forges and rails and quit Dust because their design team is astonishingly ill equip to be handling design
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 1244	Posted - 2013.11.22 00:55:00 - [59] - Quote CharCharOdell wrote: tankers dont want forge guns nerfed because we respect them as marksman...you know, because they have to work for their kills unlike lolswarms and yolonade lovers. Please for the love of god tell me how a FG requires sooo much skill in comparison to a SL? Super fast travel time. The IAFG has a faster charge time than the Wyrikomi and IA Swarm Launcher. And with fast travel time, it has a higher DPS. Dumbfire The ability to charge while in cover and hop out for half a second to fire. (Unless using the Breach variant) Ability to kill infantry Did I forget to mention that they both do the same base damage? They can fit through small spaces, meaning they don't have to worry about their shots crashing into a wall. Aiming is super easy, heck it's even easier than locking with a Swarm Launcher Do heavies have a grenade slot? Yep they can use Lai Dais too. And maybe pilots should just stop driving into crowds of infantry? Swarms are horribly ineffective against a good dropship pilot. FGs shred those things to bits. They require a heavy suit. Meaning if infantry starts firing at me I can survive to cover. Heck, I can even shoot them with the FG. Again, you say this as if aiming a Large Turret is difficult and/or requires skill. Check out my corp's new website here :D -HAND
Foxbat 071 The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 36	Posted - 2013.11.22 00:57:00 - [60] - Quote It will be funny when tanks aren't able to reload on maps where supply depots are not accessible to them. Hopefully CCP thought that through. *BLAP* ( X ) Call For Help ( O ) Respawn



Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.