| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
4041. So how about 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Washlee wrote: I've heard a few things New Weapons and Many Vehicle "Improvements" Anybody hear anything else or a window for release on this patch. I have heard rumours of new vechiles to!!
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:59:00
|
4042. Introducing CCP Saberwing! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mad Mav wrote: Welcome Saber Wing! Know what this calls for?...... BACON!!!!!!! Nothing but the finest!! Welcome Saberwing, good luck!!
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:38:00
|
4043. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: Fact of the matter is if I can do that job better when I get out of my tank than a specced infantryman you are doing something wrong...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:33:00
|
4044. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: Fact of the matter is if I can do that job better when I get out of my tank than a specced infantryman you are doing something wron...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:29:00
|
4045. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Some oc us do but its a big hard, when there is 100m gap with no cover!! Fact of the matter is if I can do that job better when I get out of my tank than ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:23:00
|
4046. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Some oc us do but its a big hard, when there is 100m gap with no cover!! Fact of the matter is if I can do that job better when I get out of my tank than...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:14:00
|
4047. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
ladwar wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Some oc us do but its a big hard, when there is 100m gap with no cover!! grab a LAV or even better a dropship if you need to go that far. they are transport that use can use to well trasnport yourself over ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:01:00
|
4048. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Some oc us do but its a big hard, when there is 100m gap with no cover!! Fact of the matter is if I can do that job better when I get out of my tank than a specced infantryman you are doing somethin...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 09:57:00
|
4049. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: ladwar wrote: if your using a tank for cover then your doing something wrong. if you using to provide suppressive fire maybe but they are taking our unlim...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 09:47:00
|
4050. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
MarasdF Loron wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: ladwar wrote: if your using a tank for cover then your doing something wrong. if you using to provide suppressive fire maybe but they are taking our unl...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 09:40:00
|
4051. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
MarasdF Loron wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: ladwar wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Are LAV drivers aware sometimes, we ask you to go somewhere by shooting at it? Tanks need to be prepared to move slower whdn pushing so allied infantry can use it a...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 09:28:00
|
4052. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: ladwar wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Are LAV drivers aware sometimes, we ask you to go somewhere by shooting at it? Tanks need to be prepared to move slower whdn pushing so allied infantry can use it as...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 09:26:00
|
4053. Shooting while sitting in a vehicle - in General Discussions [original thread]
The True Inferno wrote: I was thinking, how nice would it be if you could well, shoot from in a vehicle with your equipped weapon or rep the vehicles armour with a armour rep from inside. 1. This would make sitting in a drop-ship/LAV way more ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 09:18:00
|
4054. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
ladwar wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Are LAV drivers aware sometimes, we ask you to go somewhere by shooting at it? Tanks need to be prepared to move slower whdn pushing so allied infantry can use it as cover (now more than ever) Dropships I feel...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 09:11:00
|
4055. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
Are LAV drivers aware sometimes, we ask you to go somewhere by shooting at it? Tanks need to be prepared to move slower whdn pushing so allied infantry can use it as cover (now more than ever) Dropships I feel for you bro!!
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 08:50:00
|
4056. CCP, would you consider this? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Master Jaraiya wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: I think there should be a type of heavy suit that specializes in massive HP pool, but absolutely no passive HP Regen worls You're crazy. Like a seige unit? Can batten down a killzone by himself, ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 08:08:00
|
4057. CCP, would you consider this? - in General Discussions [original thread]
God Anpu TheImmortal wrote: I have been a heavy since the beginning. I have 16 million skill points and every day the heavy is becoming more useless day by day. I love this class but the truth of the matter is in this game is all these people c...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 08:05:00
|
4058. Customizable weapon mechanic - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pete B wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: The T3 weapon systems, are supposedly going to be a "build-it-your-way" kinda job If its just going to be T3 instead of T1 T2 and T3 then thats gonna be pretty ****. I don't see the same happening with vehic...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 07:20:00
|
4059. Go, subjects, theorycraft for me. I am too tired right now. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Princeps Marcellus wrote: So -- 1.5! What do you guys think will be the most optimal fits? Will shield tanks once again become the premier tanks on the battlefield? Will this, overall, be a buff or a nerf to tanks in general? will you expect so...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 00:48:00
|
4060. Starting to Notice... - in General Discussions [original thread]
velos ALKARI wrote: Last night was the closest skirmish ive ever seen..our final null shot hit their mcc about two seconds before theirs,watcged the map lol. Especially ths new maps are easier to see this, im am seeing a lot more tactics to,...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 00:41:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |