| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1881. Flaylock rifle please? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Rust color Rail Rifle. though smaller splash for the bigger mag. more reload though. I say trello card it. I never bothered to join the trello board, and for whatever reason the board always locks up on me requirin...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.01.01 12:00:00
|
1882. Even in XCOM, nobodoy likes the Caldari - in General Discussions [original thread]
Calamari != Caldari. One of the things that I dislike most about you is your cultivated persona of village idiot.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.01.01 11:53:00
|
1883. Flaylock rifle please? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Honestly I'd love to see more weapon variations, and I think the flaylock rifle would make an interesting addition to the minmatar lineup. 70m range (good luck landing a shot at that distance) faster projectile, 1.75m splash, slightly less damage...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.01.01 11:49:00
|
1884. To Rattati: customizing APEX suits. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: . . so you wouldn't want an Amarr logo to have a combat rifle on it. . . This mindset suffocates most of the customisation. This thought unnecessarily restraints and dullifies the game. It ...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.01.01 01:43:00
|
1885. Fighting as a Caldari Aint easy - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mention the word "caldari" and every gallente player on the forums comes running in to either scream about how bad they have it, or how they're 250% "better" than any caldari out there. I find this amusing as they have to be outright lying on one ...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.29 22:05:00
|
1886. Could we have new weapons added to the Roadmap? - in General Discussions [original thread]
After reading Malleus Malificorum had to say about amarr heavy weapons, I also think that using most of the same mechanics that the fusion rifle has in destiny would make an amazing heavy pulse laser weapon. Pulse lasers currently aren't represen...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.29 19:59:00
|
1887. [Concept] Basic War Barge Mechanics ver. 0.01 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Rather than having activity determine the power of you warbarge bonuses I'd rather see the acquisition of 'mp' go solely towards things like clones and instead have warbarge upgrades be simple isk/aur purchases that can be reconfigured like a fitt...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.29 03:19:00
|
1888. Sticky:[Feedback] Roadmap 2015 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I think bonuses for warbarges need to be handled carefully, I wouldn't mind seeing stuff like +4/mb bandwidth that would allow a player to have *an* uplink out while they're guarding a point as a heavy. But I don't want more generic damage /armor ...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.28 02:16:00
|
1889. Vehicles are frustrating AF.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
shaman oga wrote: Sincerely, tanks are in a good spot except some stuff that i don't like. Like: OP missiles, madrugar ultra lack of cpu, shield booster little problem, but most of all rail turret turned into a hard mode sniper rifle. I still ...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.27 10:38:00
|
1890. Finally got on Dust, - in General Discussions [original thread]
I got in but psn website still says things are offline
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.27 08:30:00
|
1891. Question about the holiday event. - in General Discussions [original thread]
With the ongoing DDoS on PSN I can't get online at all, will players still be 'honoured' for their daily logins (I have a 470+ day streak that I'd like to not lose) and will the event be pushed back at all? I know it's not your fault ccp, but the...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.25 21:57:00
|
1892. Sticky:[Feedback] Roadmap 2015 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Soraya Xel wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: Requiring a corporation to field multiple teams opens the doors for more people to participate out of necessity. Requiring a corporation to have to field multiple teams removes most of the corporati...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.25 09:04:00
|
1893. Sticky:[Feedback] Roadmap 2015 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
For some reason I envision personal warbarges almost like garrisons in WoW and this makes me hopeful as the game will feel like less of a lobby shooter. Maybe there'll be a way to use them to travel space and set up orbit on FW planets you want to...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.25 07:13:00
|
1894. Why don't more players strive for PC? - in General Discussions [original thread]
^so moon mining, incursions, pirate npc bounties, missions (eve & dust side) and the old pc isk fountains should never have happened? Because those are all activities that either generated isk for nothing or generated isk for simply playing th...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.24 22:12:00
|
1895. Why don't more players strive for PC? - in General Discussions [original thread]
You may think its not very 'new eden' but in my opinion what works for a lot of 'new eden' in many ways completely failed in dust.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.24 21:56:00
|
1896. Why don't more players strive for PC? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soraya Xel wrote: Dreis Shadowweaver wrote: Like someone else said, I'm busting my ass to make my corp's ISK increase by a fraction of a percentage, and I'm seeing none of it. I think it's key that Planetary Conquest's old "corp wallet ...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.24 21:45:00
|
1897. Why don't more players strive for PC? - in General Discussions [original thread]
1) very high barriers to entry This is a combination of factors, ranging from the games small population making it near impossible to 'build' a pc corp (you're better off just to join an established one) to requiring a minimum level of sp to even ...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.24 21:22:00
|
1898. Are Commandos really that bad? - in General Discussions [original thread]
In the case of the amarr and the gallente, their respective assaults do about 1-2% more dmg if triple-stacking damage mods, this is *before* the performance buffs that the assaults get. That said it *is* nice to carry an av weapon alongside a rif...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.24 13:52:00
|
1899. Why do the Gallente have Kinetic Catalyzers? - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: I don't mean to complain but I honestly don't understand why. The Gallente probably get the least benefit from them because on addition to having slow armored suits they have regular stamina. Every o...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.21 05:30:00
|
1900. so.. how about a heavy nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pushing Charlie wrote: Then do us a favour. Stop posting pictures from pubs as soon as you're called out. It proves absolutely nothing. If you're really as good as you say you are, then you don't need pictures to prove it. I've never had th...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2014.12.21 01:46:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |