| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
941. Reallocation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Solarisjock wrote: i wonder if they are going to adjust the price of the books as well i would guess yes.
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.03 20:14:00
|
942. 5 Reasons Uprising Is Already A Disappointment - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: Here is the thread where I used real data from real 8v8 corp battles that I and other corps were involved in. Now project these numbers to 16 vs 16 https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63845 Here is the de...
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.03 17:50:00
|
943. Dust Sov warefare by the numbers -Economics- - in General Discussions [original thread]
still hoping these numbers improve
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.03 17:41:00
|
944. 5 Reasons Uprising Is Already A Disappointment - in General Discussions [original thread]
Grezkev wrote: Free Beers wrote: Grezkev wrote: PC is just bad and CCP should feel bad? LOL Lost interest after reading that. If you have any understanding of eve and nullsec mechanics you would see ccp is simply repeating the same...
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.03 17:32:00
|
945. Will The Respec Equal more Protos? - in General Discussions [original thread]
all I can say is I am looking forward to hunting proto tanks
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.03 17:28:00
|
946. 5 Reasons Uprising Is Already A Disappointment - in General Discussions [original thread]
I honestly can't say it is a disappointment because I have not played it. Do I wish I had all the things now that CCP has mentioned they want in the game, yea, sure, of course I do. I agree that Beers usually has good/constructive ideas and is s...
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.03 17:13:00
|
947. Planetary Conquest is Magic! - in General Discussions [original thread]
As I replied in another post : Because it is going to mean losing your district. In a one-off scenario, I agree, this is very exploitable. However, I am thinking/hoping that if EVERYONE has this going on (and most corps will have multiple distr...
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.03 17:01:00
|
948. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Because it is going to mean losing your district. In a one-off scenario, I agree, this is very exploitable. However, I am thinking/hoping that if EVERYONE has this going on (and most corps will have multiple districts) and districts keep changing...
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.03 16:46:00
|
949. Plantary Conquest according to Beers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: Update- New mechanic "resistance fund": There are always parts of the civilian population that loathe the merc group that is in charge of the district. There could be a group of district manage skills to lessen the impact of ...
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.03 16:28:00
|
950. Planetary Conquest is Magic! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Referencing this idea . Essentially, take 5% / 7% / 10% from the profit (per day they are in control) that a corporation makes on a district and store it in a "takeover fund" so that whomever comes in and takes over the district will be rewarded...
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.03 16:25:00
|
951. Is Anyone Else Upset? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote: Maximus Stryker wrote: it will be interesting to see what people dive into when they have 7 - 12 million SP available 12 million?? holy crap that's just insane you must be close unless you don't use any booster...
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.02 20:52:00
|
952. CCP Patchnotes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: There are my fan notes... but people got upset so I ain't going to post it again. link to original post?
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.02 18:59:00
|
953. Thought's on the Videocast Update and Eve/Dust Link - in General Discussions [original thread]
my bad. It was fine, the chat box was wayyyy to cluttered. It would have been better to post an Outline of topics and then take questions after each topic rather just just go with the flow of Q from the chat box...IMO
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.02 18:52:00
|
954. How long before an inactive character is deleted? - in General Discussions [original thread]
also, you may need to relogin to to gain passive SP for the year, we will on May 7th when the new build launches and if out alts are passively gaining or not...When we switched to TQ back in January (?) you needed to download the update and relog ...
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.02 18:49:00
|
955. Is Anyone Else Upset? - in General Discussions [original thread]
it will be interesting to see what people dive into when they have 7 - 12 million SP available
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.02 18:42:00
|
956. Thought's on the Videocast Update and Eve/Dust Link - in General Discussions [original thread]
that's what this thread is for: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=67102&p=2
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.02 18:39:00
|
957. AV nade damage? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I believe a general rule of thumb is to move the decimal place to the right one spot... so pack AV reads 175 then it actually is 1,750
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.02 17:58:00
|
958. Announcement:Merc Cast: Your Official DUST 514 Podcast! - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
Klivve Cussler wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: You guys are all going on about the respec, didn't you hear? We're finally getting a character creator! Yeah that kind of blew me away. This is going to be the BEST month ever. *Fixed
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.04.02 17:56:00
|
959. Help a new guy out with fittings - in General Discussions [original thread]
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=899
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.03.27 17:04:00
|
960. Next Dust 514 Player Tournament - in General Discussions [original thread]
Is this open to all corps? (aka - is DEVHX allowed to participate? Will they participate under their different corps?)
- by Maximus Stryker - at 2013.03.27 17:03:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |