| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1021. Factional Warefare Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: No matter what the final system is... faction warfare should have unique rewards that you cannot get from playing in IB/PC in order to make the game mode worth playing. I just hope you guys move away from the carebear IB system...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 17:23:00
|
1022. Factional Warefare Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: No matter what the final system is... faction warfare should have unique rewards that you cannot get from playing in IB/PC in order to make the game mode worth playing. I just hope you guys move away from the carebear IB system...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 17:21:00
|
1023. What does it take to get a dev response? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: This thread gets the Cat Merc seal of approval. I put a lot of effort into cowriting and testing everything with Arkena for that armor thread, all for nothing. :( that makes me sad CAT!
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 17:21:00
|
1024. Factional Warefare Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Robot Devil wrote: Allow pilots to pool ISK EVE side and mercs to pool ISK DUST side. If some pilots wanted to take a system easier they would add to the mercenary pool for the system they want control of and the pool of ISK would be divide...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 17:19:00
|
1025. WTF? CCP are you serious?? GǣCavityGǥ M2 Contact Locus Grenade 20 AUR 10 AUR [50%... - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Eterne wrote: We'll actually have a dev blog out on Contact Grenades and their balance in the near future. and so the mighty devs finally bent their knees to the cries of the whiners. Im interested to see what the blog is about!
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 17:17:00
|
1026. Factional Warefare Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zeylon Rho wrote: True Adamance wrote: Zeylon Rho wrote: I picture standings being like: Fight a battle for the AMARR= Standings shift: Amarr +5 Minmatar -5 or Amarr +5 Caldari +1 Minmatar -5 Gallente -1 If you decide to change fact...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 17:16:00
|
1027. Factional Warefare Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Razor Signal wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: Standings are actually something we are looking at. We have a design rolling around for improvements to FW that involves them. I am personally not a fan of ...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 17:14:00
|
1028. Factional Warefare Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Thor McStrut wrote: Here's a question for those presenting this design. If I grind to 5.0 standing with Caldari, and unlock some Navy level rail rifle, but choose to grind back my standing with Gallente by fighting for M...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 17:04:00
|
1029. Factional Warefare Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: Standings are actually something we are looking at. We have a design rolling around for improvements to FW that involves them. I am personally not a fan of loyalty points for a couple reasons; that doesn't mean they won't ev...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 16:56:00
|
1030. CCP, WHAT THE ACTUAL F**K IS WRONG WITH YOU!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
C Saunders wrote: CCP: Don't worry guys DUST isnt pay to win. Adds fused locus grenade. CCP: Don't worry we've added a grenade thats not equal to the stats of the fused but its isk so its all good. ADDS: Cavity M2 Contact Locus Grenade! Yay t...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 16:36:00
|
1031. Factional Warefare Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
ChromeBreaker wrote: Marston VC wrote: ChromeBreaker wrote: Yes at the moment there is no "real" differance with FW except a different matchmaking... which commonally leads to full squads coming up against newbros. FW needs an incentive,...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 09:11:00
|
1032. A simple fix (Assault Logi) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nemo Bluntz wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Hope you know this idea has been discussed at least 100 times since Uprising released. If I knew that, do you think I would've made a thread about it? I honestly never saw the idea proposed, and my ...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 09:10:00
|
1033. "The Plasma Express" (My day 1 experiances with the mighty Plasma cannon) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Banning Hammer wrote: Marston VC wrote: Banning Hammer wrote: IS not all bad... lol. .. well most of it.. but not all. The direct damage is huge, it kills heavies instantly, the shield damage is very useful against pesty tanks, and is an ...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 09:01:00
|
1034. "The Plasma Express" (My day 1 experiances with the mighty Plasma cannon) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: The best thing about the plasma cannon is that it instantly gibs any clone so no revives. Lol, thank god the logibro standing next to the comrade i just killed doesn't put his gun away to try and revive him and instea...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 09:00:00
|
1035. Why isn't there a "viewed by CCP employee" tag for posts? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aoena Rays wrote: No other game forum has "viewed by dev" tag. Not even stupid World of Warcraft. CCP reads everything and they've proven it multiple times. No other game forum gives you weekly updates saying "look dudes, we are reading your w...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 08:59:00
|
1036. Seriously....? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: I mean... Seriously..? This is what it all amounts to..? No-wonder I got first running an all BPO Scout.... http://i.imgur.com/ddeJC0p.jpg This is just depressing. Im so burnt out on Dust because of this silly event (100 i...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 08:54:00
|
1037. Where are the fixes? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think they were focused on fixing other, much more game-breaking things likeeeeeee infantry humping dropships, infantry raping god tanks, dumb fire swarm launchers that could explode everyone in an entire room without damaging the user. Awful hi...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 08:49:00
|
1038. Factional Warefare Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
ChromeBreaker wrote: Yes at the moment there is no "real" differance with FW except a different matchmaking... which commonally leads to full squads coming up against newbros. FW needs an incentive, i dont think restricting the suits we can us...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 08:46:00
|
1039. Dust 128 VS 128..... Would it really be fun?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Johnny Guilt wrote: 24v24 or 30v30(tops) wouldn't be too chaotic for the current maps but we'd need to teaek them a bit to accommodate the larger player count The maps are huge as it is..... the higher player count would make them feel actu...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 08:09:00
|
1040. Dust 128 VS 128..... Would it really be fun?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryan Mauler wrote: Marston VC wrote: My answer to you is RIGHT HERE Never gonna happen in MAG huh? Sureeeeee Sorry, here's a clarification. Swarming like a bunch of Zerglings is never gonna happen. Never. Swarm tactics are obviously ve...
- by Marston VC - at 2013.07.16 08:08:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |