| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
81. DUST514 is an awful title. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Talos Vagheitan wrote: Just in case anyone doesn't know, 514 is because the game was released on may 14th. 8/10 troll, higher quality than I usually see. There are probably quite a few people who don't know any better.
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.30 21:43:00
|
82. My Official CPM Platform - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alcina Nektaria wrote: I don't know why anyone would be shocked by anything Dust User says. He has never had a filter. Well y'know there was a time long, long ago...
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.30 20:38:00
|
83. My Official CPM Platform - in General Discussions [original thread]
Can you do me? You're so close to having my vote.
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.30 16:18:00
|
84. Restoring honor to the CPM - in General Discussions [original thread]
Madden you've got to come up with something NEW and funny for this one. Otherwise it's just the same joke and you walked through the CPM app page. I know you'll come through for me. Your sense of honor wouldn't let it be otherwise.
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.29 17:53:00
|
85. VIP mode - in General Discussions [original thread]
deezy dabest wrote: Leither Yiltron wrote: This strikes me as deeply contrived. Why on earth would someone trade one asset for an identical copy of the same asset? Frankly I wouldn't be surprised if you made this up, and even if you didn't...
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.28 23:06:00
|
86. VIP mode - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jadek Menaheim wrote: deezy dabest wrote: I have no problem with them being taken back and I intentionally stayed away from selling these to people. Actually your mention of collateral damage explains exactly what happened here. I have not...
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.28 22:00:00
|
87. FoxGÇÖs picks for CPM2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'd like to thank you wholeheartedly for your endorsement, Fox. It means a lot to me. It's my uncomfortable duty to relay that I've made the decision not to run for CPM this year due to a very recent change in circumstances. I'm sorry for having...
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.28 20:55:00
|
88. All I see for CPM 2... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Slim Winning wrote: So, none of the CPMs have anything to address about the number one cause the game failed? They claimed to have tried to train players, but blah, blah, blah excuses... Some of the best players in the game, came from trainers...
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.27 01:23:00
|
89. Legion - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortishai Belmont wrote: It's time to just walk away D: I for one hope they did drop it and are focusing their attention and efforts purely on Dust. Well boy do I have good news for you!
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.26 18:21:00
|
90. Raiding Corps, Is It Worth It? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ice Royal Glantix wrote: This most recent update was supposed to make it possible for corporations without districts to simply attack other corporations districts and "keep what they kill" without actually trying to take the districts. This ...
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.21 04:55:00
|
91. CCP polish the game, lag/fps..then port - in General Discussions [original thread]
This is a sincerely novel insight. Nobody whose job relies on the profitability of Dust as a business venture has even considered the proposed plan, or in fact any plan bearing resemblance to it. You've revealed a truly exemplary line of logic tha...
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.19 20:09:00
|
92. Is it time for FF in pubs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
No.
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.19 17:34:00
|
93. PC 2.1 : Resolve the no-show issue ! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I was pretty fearful this sort of trend would pick up given the changes, and said so both on the forums and on Biomassed. At the very least there needs to be an "auto-win" mechanic that gives a victory to the team that shows up. If your corp do...
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.17 18:50:00
|
94. Congratulations Jadek! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I am at least half joking! But which half? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQoRXhS7vlU
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.17 04:26:00
|
95. Congratulations Jadek! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jadek Menaheim wrote: A round of 'likes' all around for the celebration . Now be straight with me: The OP isn't an alt posting a fabricated story to generate good vibes and get people to send you ISK, right? Because if it's not there's ...
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.17 04:09:00
|
96. Why this game is still alive? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Balistyc Farshot wrote: but it keeps rising again. Unfortunately that's not precisely how I would describe it. More like it refuses to die. xD
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.16 21:05:00
|
97. What was your first ever forum post - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Doesn't go back far enough Try just searching Google for "Veteran_[your character name]" instead. Mind you it looks like something weird happened to old threads- all the ones Google turned up were ones where I was OP, a...
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.16 06:00:00
|
98. CPM Election and a bad feeling - in General Discussions [original thread]
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: Every time around this year i always get a sick feeling because there are always a large amount of people who slip into the CPM. They get in not because they are good at organization and communication or have any leadersh...
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.16 00:12:00
|
99. Corps that use EVE characters for Administratnion purposes? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Molon Labe. and KEQ do, almost certainly Faction Warfare Army though I can't speak for Contra. Kane does for Negative Feedback. I've personally maintained an Eve character on and off to access certain features, including API pulls that contain inf...
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.14 20:57:00
|
100. Scammed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Krias Thracian wrote: Congratulations on using reductio ad absurdem like a child because they've been proven wrong. Specific exemptions for that is entirely unnecessary. It's discourteous, not illegal or even morally w...
- by Leither Yiltron - at 2015.07.14 20:49:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |