| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
881. ccp doesnt get enough love. - in General Discussions [original thread]
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote: Leadfoot10 wrote: People just like to ***** and complain. It's a symptom of anonymity and prevalent everywhere on the Internet. I'd tell them in real life "CCP fix your latency", but alas i'll have to use the s...
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 17:52:00
|
882. Daily missions. Are they good for you? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yesterday, I got 8 boxes, about 150k ISK, roughly 15k SP, and a few STD weapons. Haven't checked today yet.
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 16:41:00
|
883. CCP Conspiracy theory: Why We Auto INERTIA DAMPEN - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Nothing as funny as that., just a "what can we do to make our new players not die in the first second of the game". Good idea, bad execution, nothing more to say but that we will try and fix it. pe...
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 16:30:00
|
884. lost skill - in General Discussions [original thread]
Forlorn Destrier wrote: JKG555 wrote: so last time i played the game was august/september 2013. ive been trying to update the game for the last few weeks ive only just managed to download the updates. i started playing and had no dropsuits ...
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 16:28:00
|
885. dose the new scan style work with active scaners???? - in General Discussions [original thread]
There has been no change to active scanning. The active scanners work just as they did before 1.10 -- their range is the same, they still show direction, and there is no falloff like passive scans.
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 16:27:00
|
886. Remote explosives not damaging equipment - in General Discussions [original thread]
I agree with the OP. Never made sense to me why REs don't always destroy equipment, and unfortunately, people exploit this to camp uplinks. The good news is that unless the RE is glitched under ground in some places (still possible), a flux des...
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 15:47:00
|
887. @DEVS Add Two Decimal Places To Ewar Stats In Fittings - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vitantur Nothus wrote: EWAR values are rounded to the nearest whole number in game. ... ties go to the scanner ^^^ This.
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 15:44:00
|
888. ccp doesnt get enough love. - in General Discussions [original thread]
People just like to ***** and complain. It's a symptom of anonymity and prevalent everywhere on the Internet.
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 15:43:00
|
889. @CCP Frame: Christmas Wishlist - in General Discussions [original thread]
Please no BPO dropships! Otherwise, a pretty good list from where I sit.
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 05:53:00
|
890. Is Dust becoming P2W now? - in General Discussions [original thread]
None in that list are really P2W, no matter how many words you use to justify your argument -- you can get each and every one of them through playing the game. And BTW, strongboxes do NOT appear to be the "best way to get officer gear". And remem...
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 05:49:00
|
891. New Orbital system has a MASSIVE flaw - in General Discussions [original thread]
Known issue. They're on it.
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 05:47:00
|
892. loyalty rank names blocking actual names - in General Discussions [original thread]
The option to turn them off (for yourself) is there in the options menu, but I think we need another option to turn them off entirely.
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 05:46:00
|
893. People are complaining about the daily challenges? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Finished off all 10 today, no problem. My only issue with them is the seven boxes I got today didn't have anything noteworthy. But that could just be the RNG gods not liking me. GG tonight, BTW.
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 05:44:00
|
894. Assault varients - in General Discussions [original thread]
ARR sucks? I don't agree....at all. If you're having trouble getting through shields with the ACR, you might try the BrScP first, then switch.
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.10 05:43:00
|
895. laginmfao - in General Discussions [original thread]
Had some this morning, but has been butter smooth all afternoon...including the PC we just got done with.
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.09 23:35:00
|
896. OB's are glitched - in General Discussions [original thread]
Agreed & known bug.
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.09 23:34:00
|
897. Scouts are done. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scouts aren't done, but they have become MUCH harder. I tend to agree with Templar XIII, above, in that the Min Assault is looking very tasty....
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.09 23:07:00
|
898. Players I need your help - in General Discussions [original thread]
My first reaction: Gal Logi. Dem scans. My 2nd reaction: Gal or Amarr Assault -- particularly if you run AR or ScR. Both are in a very good place. I also agree with G, above, in that the BrScP is a beast pistol if you can handle the single shot ...
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.09 23:04:00
|
899. Sentinels514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Leadfoot10 wrote: That will work....the first time....maybe the 2nd, then my "sneaky amarr" comes out (i.e. double dampened with 2 range amps and 2 precision enhancers w/proto cloak). You will not scan me in that suit...
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.09 22:46:00
|
900. Sentinels514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fair enough. For those interested in Breakin's proposal, please see this thread .
- by Leadfoot10 - at 2014.12.09 21:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |