| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
4181. A non mentioned DUST514 issue : BAD MAP DESIGN - in General Discussions [original thread]
I belive part of the imbalance that has Dust 514 in its current situation is because of faulty MAP DESIGN. What do i even mean with this? well while playing BF3 yesterday i realized even if i was with randoms we could hold an objective because he...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.26 22:42:00
|
4182. To all the ProtoStompers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: How the hell do you do so good?? You were expecting a QQ thread weren't you? :D btw This is mostly aimed at people like Ancient Exiles and 0uter.Heaven. I find it funny, yesterday i was playing with a guy that always give...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.26 21:52:00
|
4183. Everyone complains about pubstomping... - in General Discussions [original thread]
HyperionsThunder wrote: So maybe we should spitball some ideas to try and alleviate the issue. I mean, people shouldn't be penalized for earning their gear, and working in a team, but...if you are a new player, and you get pubstomped even just ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.26 21:43:00
|
4184. Announcement:Weapon stats! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Im NOT very happy with the AV weapon changes, but i'll wait to actually test them vs the ''balanced'' vehicles. it seems that at 220 per swarm, and ADV swarm launcher will only do 1100 dm. Taking into account that tanks have over 6k HP, up to 30-...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.26 21:37:00
|
4185. Noobish questions - PRofile DAmpeners - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch and Sgt kirk say they dont have stacking penalties. Which i have tested and confirmed. It seems that they dont suffer from stacking penalties and the passive bonus is fully added too... Im using a basic pro.dampener and an enhanc...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.26 21:31:00
|
4186. Noobish questions - PRofile DAmpeners - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Thunder Fist wrote: trolling you oh you think your important enough for me to troll, cute, I ask only for you to stop trying to speak your idiotic ideals as there are some easily influenced people out there who might actually listen to you...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:53:00
|
4187. Debunking the 'Assault Logi' Myth - in General Discussions [original thread]
RydogV wrote: Well I do not really see your point here. Both fittings are equally viable. What makes one more likely than the other? The SP needed for both would be the same. If the opportunity to fit a tanked Assault is there and people choos...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:52:00
|
4188. Noobish questions - PRofile DAmpeners - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: I started speccing into Profile dampeners , since im so fed up with Active scanners leading to gang r4pes .... So i have something that might be considered noobish: ''Do profile dampeners HAVE stacki...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:49:00
|
4189. Noobish questions - PRofile DAmpeners - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Thunder Fist wrote: orders who is giving orders? I'm asking not telling telling would be foolish as there would be no way for me to enforce it. asking on the other hand is compleatly different and entirely feasible that someone would liste...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:46:00
|
4190. Debunking the 'Assault Logi' Myth - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Since 1.4, which I refer to as the CoD patch, TTK is so ridiculously low that that extra EHP only amounts an extra 0.5 seconds. Which is exactly the amount of time needed to win a fire fight in a game like DUST,with such ridi...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:43:00
|
4191. Noobish questions - PRofile DAmpeners - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Thunder Fist wrote: of course I can do something I can ask you to stop. that doesn't mean you will stop but I've still done something about it. by the way the whole bolding of sentences is getting old too. Your opinion is meaningless ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:41:00
|
4192. Debunking the 'Assault Logi' Myth - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Bingo! Wait until 1.4 and see how all powerful these "evil logis" are when their god gun finally gets nerfed. Calling it now. ASCR ? Breach ARs and Combar Rifles? SMGs? The weapon will be different, the dropsuit advantages wo...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:39:00
|
4193. Debunking the 'Assault Logi' Myth - in General Discussions [original thread]
RydogV wrote: Well I believe originally I was responding to all the widespread allegations regarding straight up head to head encounters people were saying that they were having with Logis. The type of firefights where Shield and Armor regener...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:38:00
|
4194. Death of the AR threads and the new Rising of DIVERSITY - in General Discussions [original thread]
THUNDERGROOVE wrote: Nocturnal Soul wrote: The Lr needs a range buff for every tier. LR needs like 25 extra optimal range and no instant falloff. We might get it in a few months because it has half of "Assault Rifle" in the name. LOL...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:34:00
|
4195. Debunking the 'Assault Logi' Myth - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: 1000+ ehp means nothing if you cant make it around that corner just sayin. Logis can. :3
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:32:00
|
4196. Noobish questions - PRofile DAmpeners - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Thunder Fist wrote: me I'm nobody just a lurker who is tired of seeing you complain and try and wreak the game have a nice day :D thanks for insulting my corp I didn't know them back in mag but I'll be sure to tell them that they suck now ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:32:00
|
4197. Debunking the 'Assault Logi' Myth - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Cosgar wrote: They're all still using Caldari logistics or Caldari assaul- OMG... NERF CALDARI!!! LOL funny, I agree on the Cal Logi, but im guessing its mostly becasue they were old FOTM chasers. ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:31:00
|
4198. Scout Slots; Silencers Specifically. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Again, I just don't believe a scout should be required to carry an active scanner to actually scout enemy locations. The passive scan should be enough for the scout, while the active scanner is still the only way to share t...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:29:00
|
4199. Scout Slots; Silencers Specifically. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gh0st C0de wrote: I like this. Though, if we made Active Scanners part of the -scout only- equipment category, suddenly way fewer people are capable of using them and the role of the scout AS a scout becomes far more important. WEll , Sc...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:28:00
|
4200. Debunking the 'Assault Logi' Myth - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: They're all still using Caldari logistics or Caldari assaul- OMG... NERF CALDARI!!! LOL funny, I agree on the Cal Logi, but im guessing its mostly becasue they were old FOTM chasers. On the other side of the coin, i've seen m...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.25 04:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |