| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
421. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
LAVALLOIS Nash wrote: Almost all the gameplayI do is logi. And I think this change will impact me negatively. Please hear me out: I understand that there are concerns about "equipment spam". By this, im sure they mean when people put down 50 ...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.20 12:32:00
|
422. Unsure how the bandwith proposal works? Read this. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Blueprint For Murder wrote: I understand this is needed to stop exploitation, but it does sadden me that I will no longer be able to use REs and uplinks or booby trap my uplinks with REs. I guess I will fit a hive instead. Yeah, honestly I t...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.20 12:10:00
|
423. [Feedback] Logi progression is awful - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Great post. +1 BTW, the reason the Amarr logi is so much better at ADV (and relatively so at STD) is because originally only the proto suit had the sidearm. That was silly so when they fixed the Amarr suit (remember the 20 total PG at STD? Lol) t...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.20 03:13:00
|
424. Unsure how the bandwith proposal works? Read this. - in General Discussions [original thread]
howard sanchez wrote: big fan of the bandwidth proposal as described. Have they suggested a date/timeframe they'd like to deploy whatever the final product is? Secondly, OP - nice explanation & examples. Would you consider posting somethin...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.20 00:22:00
|
425. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Imp Smash wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: 8 is not a lot only because I am an Amarr logi and that's my role. I've been doing this since beta. I didn't suddenly become the source of massive carpet-bombing spam. Spam occurs because currently ...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.20 00:18:00
|
426. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Imp Smash wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: Imp Smash wrote: I like the idea a lot -- just lookin at the numbers: Say you have a BW of 32 (for some Pro logis). That means about 8 pieces of equipment (extremely simplified). Is that what ya'l...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 23:39:00
|
427. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jadd Hatchen wrote: So the whole thing in this thread about people swapping roles after deploying equipment got me to thinking... If they make it so that the bandwidth of the currently equipped dropsuit is used for the max deployables possible,...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 23:36:00
|
428. Unsure how the bandwith proposal works? Read this. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Apothecary Za'ki wrote: example oen i have not seen exact examples of this but there is alot of spam around supply depos as for second example i thought the amarr logi bonus only worked when it was the amarr logi suit which had dropped said up...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 23:27:00
|
429. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Any why does the equipment pop if the scout has to switch fits, unless its to a sentinel? Or anyone else to switch fits for that matter? Everyone else can have some equipment out. It's not like the uplink pops every time you switch suits no matt...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 23:12:00
|
430. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: S-PANZA wrote: Another option is to substitute the first step (speed scout making drops) to logi spamming equipment....then switching to slayer logi suits. FTFY Uhh......
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 23:07:00
|
431. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Ku Shala wrote: this will just leave pubs without uplinks and hives more equipment less usage is the solution example: 20 uplinks can be carried that allow 3 spawns only, same restrictions we currently have Or just p...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 23:03:00
|
432. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Apothecary Za'ki wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: Apothecary Za'ki wrote: doubt it.. scouts wont have to sacrifice anything neither will assaults commandos sentinels HAVs LAVs or ADS/DS.. this change is only geared at screwing logi's over ...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 22:56:00
|
433. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Uhh... are you guys on crack? Have fun running a good old fashioned "slayer logi" with the current state of logi suits compared to the rest.
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 22:24:00
|
434. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Apothecary Za'ki wrote: doubt it.. scouts wont have to sacrifice anything neither will assaults commandos sentinels HAVs LAVs or ADS/DS.. this change is only geared at screwing logi's over This I still don't get. Do you actually understand ...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 22:20:00
|
435. Unsure how the bandwith proposal works? Read this. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Meisterjager Jagermeister wrote: I usually drop one militia uplink per match and often switch out to a heavy frame later in the match. Will this pop my link? I don't want to be trapped in a medium or light suit to keep that link active if the s...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 21:46:00
|
436. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RedPencil wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: RedPencil wrote: Jadd Hatchen wrote: So the point I'm making is that Scouts should either have one less equipment slot or have no sidearm slot.. You can still fit a sidearm in a light weapon slo...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 18:36:00
|
437. Unsure how the bandwith proposal works? Read this. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lynn Beck wrote: Question, does the Heavy have any BW? If it has like 1-2 eq worth, it would still be possible to toss yourself a uplink/ishy hive, but no throwing yourself an invuln nest that is impervious to any sustained DPS. Currently it...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 18:31:00
|
438. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
No system is perfect, everyone will have to make some kind of sacrifice in order to limit EQ spam. This way, IMO, impacts everyone except logi's far more than it does logi's. This topic has been the central point of debate at least 3-4 times in ...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 18:26:00
|
439. Unsure how the bandwith proposal works? Read this. - in General Discussions [original thread]
abdullah muzaffar wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: Indeed. And equipment logis aren't even trapped in their role. Conceivably you can still fit a logi suit for deployables, deploy your stuff, and then switch to a rep tool/injector/scanning fit witho...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 18:17:00
|
440. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: Nothing Certain wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: Can the Sentinel be given the same band width as an Assault, even though the Sentinel does not have an equipment slot? In Pub matches were no one is dropping Uplinks, I am sometim...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2014.11.19 18:11:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |