| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
821. So now that the tables have turned... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fuckin' Webifiers Say it with me!
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 22:05:00
|
822. I think it's pretty evident at this point that HAVs need a cost increase - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir, ISK is not and should not ever be a balancing factor. lmfao I love this, I get to say exactly what AVers say, and now I understand why they did it when they were OP as ****.
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 21:54:00
|
823. I feel that I'm lucky because I'm only ripped +$200 from CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Wait, you spent $200 on DUST? lawl.
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 21:28:00
|
824. Gunlogi and Madrugar are the new enforcers... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Oh give it a ******* rest, if your Militia tank is popping Gunnlogis/Madrugars, then it's because they're **** pilots, bring your **** fit against me and you die :) And I'm not even going to run two hardeners like the rest of the bad pilots in th...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 21:22:00
|
825. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
ewaaaaaar pls ccp
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 20:28:00
|
826. IS EXTORTION IN GAME PERMITTED? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Um.
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 18:55:00
|
827. PS3 due to Tank stomp - in General Discussions [original thread]
lol that's just sad.
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 17:56:00
|
828. Remove blasters from tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Remove AV.
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 17:26:00
|
829. Tankers we are not proud of you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well we weren't proud when you guys were rocking up with a fit that cost like 1/50th of our price and telling us that you guys were balanced despitole destroying the game for us :) #yolo #swag #tank514 #Imbetterthanyou #winneroftheuniverse #lolDUST
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 06:24:00
|
830. 8 tanks in a battle fields.. one full squad of proto Avers... No tank died...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ambush or Skirmish/Domi?
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 06:20:00
|
831. anyone else loosing intrest in Dust with this patch? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Still having much fun, came back, so glad I did. On cap reset, capped out a few hours later, sat up for two days straight just tanking away. Taking a step back for a little bit for Christmas, will try and get on and play a few matches every now an...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:41:00
|
832. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Killar-12 wrote: Why not just increase price Tanks are Cheap and rather strong, why not put the price out of range for most but for dedicated tankers it might not be as much of an issue due to their strength especially ...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:39:00
|
833. Just Remove AV's entirely and i bet the Tankers will say its balanced. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nope, we understand the need for AV to be able to kill us, a lot of us are enjoying smashing things up, especially since in the last few months I can safely say I've lost hundred of millions of ISK due to AV being ******* ridiculous, but we do wan...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:37:00
|
834. Forget swarms for tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chunky Munkey wrote: Okay. Respec then please. No you will forever have Tree Climbing V, Banana Eating V and Throwing Poop V.
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:33:00
|
835. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: Some people go about issues the wrong way on these forums......OK a lot of people do. Doing something like the op suggested would take away a fun aspect of the game. You don't know what they may call...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:32:00
|
836. Limit Havs deployed to 1 per side - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think having a low cap would be a bad idea, we already have a max 5 vehicle cap for each team anyways, it just means if the good tanker gets the tank out first, you're not gonna be able to have the option of outnumbering him with more tanks, and...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:25:00
|
837. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Killar-12 wrote: Sounds cool, an Infantry V Infantry function would be needed though. While it'd be cool, also Godin's idea of Vehicle v Vehicle webs, I think CCP should look at just AV v Vehicles to get the job and balance done, and then wo...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:23:00
|
838. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: This sounds like it will either be OP as hell or useless as anything. Please, elaborate? Everyones crying at Tanks for escaping, and I feel them, I run away easily. Let's pretend Web Mines were the approach taken within...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:12:00
|
839. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: message from Godin: Give it a 30 meter range, make it a equipment. Lock on similar to a swarm, and fire at said vehicle. vehicle is now slowed for X amount of time. After period is over, the equipment has to cooldown. Make ...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:05:00
|
840. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Anmol Singh wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: I've made some posts, they're long, not many people read them, so this one is short. One of the best things this game can have when it comes to balancing AV and Vehicles (All Vehicles) are Webifiers, ...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 01:59:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |