| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
501. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Laughing at ones self, aka self degradation is a sign of desiring acceptance at any cost. But you don't have to pay that cost, Gustavo. I will love you forever and always. Tell me where it hurts.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 16:43:00
|
502. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
You seem angry Gustavo. Please, tell me about your life troubles. I am your friend and I am here to help you through this difficult time.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 16:17:00
|
503. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thats just it. There's a tank? Ok, I ignore him and wait inside. What threat does he pose to me now? None. The null cannon is still shooting, why do I give a damn how long he sits out there?
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:53:00
|
504. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: Tanks are already OP, and you want to buff them by making them able to disable null cannons too. o_o Tanks and turrets being able to damage MCCs was around a long time ago, but it was found to be pretty br...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:43:00
|
505. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
LT SHANKS wrote: Tankers can step out of their vehicles and hack sh it as well. Who says they can't function as infantry? I'm not asking them to function as infantry. I'm asking them to function as vehicles.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:39:00
|
506. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
gustavo acosta wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: I've been in hundreds of PC's and I've never once watched a tank hack a point, or been in a situation where an equal number of AV couldn't have defeated on an equal number of tanks. They don't n...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:36:00
|
507. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
And anti-infantry infantry are vulnerable to tanks. But the difference here is that AV can kill tanks and shoot back at infantry, even if less effectively. Anti-infantry infantry can't do anything to tanks. And tanks can't do anything to objectiv...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:33:00
|
508. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I've been in hundreds of PC's and I've never once watched a tank hack a point, or been in a situation where an equal number of AV couldn't have defeated on an equal number of tanks.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:28:00
|
509. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Unless the force they are multiplying can enter a building, they are multiplying by zero and are worthless. You know whats funny? Those AV infantry can hack a point. That makes them better.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:24:00
|
510. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Tanks can't even hack points how the hell are they OP? Every game mode can be won by reducing the enemy clone count to zero. HAVs are pretty much a-goddamn-mazing at the wholesale genocide of inf...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:18:00
|
511. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tanks can't even hack points how the hell are they OP? Sit inside building with objective, watch as tank does nothing. That's the extent of their usefulness in most fights. Unless the tank gets super aggressive and starts wedging himself in reall...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:13:00
|
512. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Infantry endgame is taking and holding objectives, which wins the match. Tank endgame is attacking other tanks, while running away from AV. In the case of no AV or enemy tanks, it's shooting at infantry who are not concealed within the loving emb...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:03:00
|
513. What is the single worst thing to happen to Dust? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KA24DERT wrote: Aim assist is the worst thing to happen to this game. The game has always had it, except during Uprising 1.0-1.5 in which every competitive player fell back to using explosives or otherwise non-projectile oriented weaponry as...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 13:44:00
|
514. One Extreme to another. - in General Discussions [original thread]
HMG can't do anything against a remote. Fat suits can't even walk away from them before they detonate its ridiculous. Assault suit with remotes right now shuts down the entire battlefield lol.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 07:58:00
|
515. [Announcement] Planetary Conquest Think Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kevall Longstride wrote: OK. My general disregard for all things PC related is reasonably well documented. D-UNI tried it and by the time I decided to pull us out of it, the egos, histrionics, drama, epeen and exploits damn well near broke me...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 05:50:00
|
516. [Announcement] Planetary Conquest Think Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
There is no such thing as a passive benefit in PC. If you own land, its going to be threatened. That means you're active enough to defend it, or you're not. The mere concept of passive isk only ever applied to Nyain San because they were able to...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.05 20:33:00
|
517. [Announcement] Planetary Conquest Think Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Assuming drone AI worked that would be a funny solution honestly.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.05 18:33:00
|
518. [Announcement] Planetary Conquest Think Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't want my children learning how to post wrong because they saw this guy doing unethical stuff on the dust forums. Somebody stop this monster.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.05 18:28:00
|
519. [Announcement] Planetary Conquest Think Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
He really is. He's having a conversation with himself. Crazy bastard, stop. In the name of all that is decent, quit being weird.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.05 18:25:00
|
520. [Announcement] Planetary Conquest Think Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Are you having a conversation with yourself? Stop that immediately.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.05 18:22:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |