| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
741. Reduction on MD recoil through armor tanking idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hey it doesnt bother me one bit if CCP leaves it alone, Remember i DONT ADS fire with MD. Im just trying to provide a solution to those ADS players using AR or other weapons that say the impact recoil is ramped up a bit too high. A fix in this cou...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.28 21:10:00
|
742. Reduction on MD recoil through armor tanking idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Im referring to the impact recoil of the weapon on users who are trying to ADS fire back at me. Im told that it is very high based on comments from other users in the forum so no it wasnt Doug Ugly since he deuces on everyone and every weapon user...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.28 20:39:00
|
743. Why remove Skim Junction? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Also ambush and ambush OMS. Splitting the base though not likely to have much impact me thinks. And can anyone else taste the the vehicle spam to ensue in the non OMS ambush mode? no depots, no blasters, all carnage!!!!
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.28 14:02:00
|
744. Reduction on MD recoil through armor tanking idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hey everyone's favorite Masshole here how you doing? Anyway got to get to work but cant access forums there so im posting this for you guys to discuss before i offer it up as a suggestion in the feedback thread. Im thinking for every 15-30 HP ...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.28 13:57:00
|
745. Logi suit II....Why? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I thought this was a waste of a suit too. Because i saw the movement increase and laughed and thought that barely makes a difference im talking between Type I and Type II not at proto level yet. Well then i unlocked it, I was so used to moving l...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.28 13:49:00
|
746. Woah! +60 kills - in General Discussions [original thread]
Man i would have really sworn this was a noob post. So shocked at the been here two builds ago admission, i figured this out 2 days in after i ran SL for the first time. Hey did you know you can also get 72WP for revive. Lots of squad commands a...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.28 06:28:00
|
747. SP Earning Bug? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SP Bug, Lulz. to answer your question i will say there is a daily Cap of 27,200 SP/day 40,800 with active booster,once you reach the daily limit there is a soft cap whereby you are 50/75 WP a game. Also you earn 24,000 SP/day passively 36,000 wit...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.28 06:23:00
|
748. You are affecting Eve with every Corp Battle!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Are the only ways to do corp battles are through the contracts EVE factions put up, what i mean is there a way for a dust player with an eve account to set up corp matches on the same district over and over again so as not to mess too much with th...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.28 04:44:00
|
749. Dust 514 + Auto Aim = Refuse to play - in General Discussions [original thread]
EVERY I REPEAT EVERY FPS on Console has aim assist, NOT EVERY GAME give you the option to turn it off why? Because controllers are soooo inaccurate without them, ask any PC FPSer about controllers and they tell you they have aim assist PC side w...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.27 18:16:00
|
750. Voting for anything other than option 5 is allowing CCP to rob you out of your m... - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: option #5 is problematic in my opinion cause tank drivers= SP vending machines. A good tank driver can rack up to between 2500-4000WP per skirmish match. Now we add the active booster to this and we get somewhere between 3...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.27 00:00:00
|
751. I switched my vote to option 5 for SP poll and why i think you should too. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yea that could work too, just dont think CCP will do it, oh well. At least we have some good foundations set for when we gear up to debate this again when CCP want to establish the "real" SP system. Thanks for the responses everyone.
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.26 20:43:00
|
752. If lasers are so OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ah the good ole false equivalency argument. Where have all our philosophy majors gone?
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.26 20:31:00
|
753. I switched my vote to option 5 for SP poll and why i think you should too. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I apologize as well, i really should grow thicker skin on the interwebz and not assume every comment on a my threads are directed at me. Just passion got the better of me and i felt like i was being dismissed for unfair reasons. Personally i agr...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.26 20:26:00
|
754. I switched my vote to option 5 for SP poll and why i think you should too. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Deleted as it has since been addressed and resolved.
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.26 20:05:00
|
755. I switched my vote to option 5 for SP poll and why i think you should too. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scurvy Granger wrote: Another one... I responded to you in proto's thread. Look at all the people arguing in favor of option 5, it's the "hardcore" players, and a lot of the time they even state they want it so they don't "get punished" for pl...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.26 19:58:00
|
756. I switched my vote to option 5 for SP poll and why i think you should too. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alaunryna Hun'ana wrote: Be honest. The REAL reason you switched to option 5 is because Protoman told you too. No i can think for myself thank you.
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.26 19:47:00
|
757. I switched my vote to option 5 for SP poll and why i think you should too. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Skihids wrote: The soft cap isn't really a cap at all because it never "caps" out. It's really just a throttle on gains above the time in match SP cap. So the only difference between this and "no cap at all" that w...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.26 19:46:00
|
758. Something to consider with no SP Cap - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yes but its a false equivalency. None of the options provided to us by CCP's poll actually remove any sort of SP cap. Im not going to relink my post and kick what seems to be a dead horse any further. But in the end all of the options are a cap an...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.26 19:38:00
|
759. I switched my vote to option 5 for SP poll and why i think you should too. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Meode wrote: 1wp=1sp up to 1000SP max a game, it is very easy to get 2500+wp a match in Skirmish even if the enemy is camped in there red line so just leaving it 1wp=1sp is a bad idea In a match that last 2x as long in skirmish if not l...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.26 19:17:00
|
760. Voting for anything other than option 5 is allowing CCP to rob you out of your m... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scurvy Granger wrote: [quote=Mirana Cheshire]I will put this simply: Option 5 only caters to the "hardcore" players not to the new players so you need to stop making that argument because everyone knows it's bull. Also "hardcore" players whet...
- by Gunner Nightingale - at 2013.01.26 19:06:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |