| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
2161. Your event of black Friday is - in General Discussions [original thread]
Calm down. Sure it's a shite event, but you can't expect CCP to cut huge chunks off their prices just because some of the retail stores in one of the countries that plays their game does it too. The only real reason to complain is about the lack ...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.27 09:17:00
|
2162. Robbing The Hood and Warriors INC You should be ashamed of yourselves - in General Discussions [original thread]
Karl Marx II wrote: KingBabar wrote: Are those salty? You just summed up the type of losers who play this way .. whats wrong can;t get a girl to even look at you so have to revert to jerking off to people getting annoyed at how much of a ...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.27 09:10:00
|
2163. then/than - in General Discussions [original thread]
____s = plural ____'s = belonging to "The GEKs have low dispersion." "The GEK's dispersion is low."
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.27 09:07:00
|
2164. Getting Ready for the New Eden Economy - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jacques Cayton II wrote: I have 20 bpo's and eventually I'm going to sell them for 10 mil each Given CCP's current feelings towards BPOs, it's unlikely they'll allow them to be traded as freely as any other items.
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.27 08:56:00
|
2165. Getting Ready for the New Eden Economy - in General Discussions [original thread]
dustwaffle wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: dustwaffle wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Alliance A sits on PC districts for months. Player market is introduced. Alliance A gains complete monopoly of the market. Rest of Dust B cannot afford anyth...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.27 05:42:00
|
2166. Getting Ready for the New Eden Economy - in General Discussions [original thread]
dustwaffle wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Alliance A sits on PC districts for months. Player market is introduced. Alliance A gains complete monopoly of the market. Rest of Dust B cannot afford anything anymore. B leaves, A sits proud on a deso...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.27 05:23:00
|
2167. The most terrifying suit in the game - in General Discussions [original thread]
The scariest suit is a militia Minmatar light frame, because the owner is clearly insane.
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.26 18:23:00
|
2168. dont give me likes, but.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Grand Master Retsof wrote: so tell me your best way to kill a Sniper that you just snuck up on.... mine...???...Remote Explosives..... Militia Minmatar light, Scanner, Scrambler, and whatever sprint mods I can fit. They always think they'...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.26 09:36:00
|
2169. Wait, now I'm curious. - in General Discussions [original thread]
xxwhitedevilxx M wrote: Joel II X wrote: Will there be officer rail Rifles and combat Rifles? Wait, wait, first off, let me have my officer Laser Rifle... Call it "Chromosome's Viziam"
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.26 06:34:00
|
2170. Please help me understand about BPO removal. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iskandar Zul Karnain wrote: I'm disappointed because CCP encouraged the sale of BPOs immediately prior to their removal. Im not a dev but I imagine it unlikely at that point they couldnt have known some modules were being removed. Anyone who pu...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.26 03:37:00
|
2171. From an ignorant perspective...what is happening here...? - in General Discussions [original thread]
With the vehicle changes coming in 1.7, a few of the BPOs will become obsolete. CCP decided to remedy this by refunding said BPOs for their aurum price. On the surface, this seems perfectly fine. However because BPOs are no longer available to pu...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.26 02:10:00
|
2172. Why are you people so Stupid? - in General Discussions [original thread]
EternalRMG wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Missing the point, yet again. CCP said they wouldn't remove BPOs, then they did. If they were comitted to their word, they could offer equivalent BPOs from the new content. Many people bought aurum jus...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.26 00:47:00
|
2173. Why are you people so Stupid? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Missing the point, yet again. CCP said they wouldn't remove BPOs, then they did. If they were comitted to their word, they could offer equivalent BPOs from the new content. Many people bought aurum just for access to the blueprints, and now those...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.26 00:26:00
|
2174. CCP - Holding stuff back on purpose? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think you're overestimating CCP.
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.25 23:56:00
|
2175. Blueprint equipment, Will it be permanent? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Everything Dies wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: [ It's rather too often that people miss the point of an argument online, but you just managed some sort of record there. 1. I answered that in the next sentence. That one you were apparently abl...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.25 23:37:00
|
2176. BPO's fall Under LIMITATION OF LIABILITY (So does everything else in Dust) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well there you go folks. You're not allowed to complain about anything. So next time they make a weapon OP, or a suit useless, you can't post here about it, because CCP hasn't broken any laws. You just have to bend over and take what's coming.
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.25 19:52:00
|
2177. BPO made this game to *BEEP* - in General Discussions [original thread]
DudE Just Die wrote: YOU ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT YOUR SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR ANY DISPUTE WITH CCP IS TO STOP USING THE SITE AND ANY RELATED SERVICES , AND TO CANCEL AND TERMINATE ALL ACCOUNTS REGISTERED TO YOU. " Terms...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.25 19:41:00
|
2178. Blueprint equipment, Will it be permanent? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Sarcastic Dreamkiller wrote: It's not about the vehicle changes. The changes are being used as an excuse to remove the BPOs. It shows the level to which they will go to take things from us. I'm not ...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.25 19:11:00
|
2179. Blueprint equipment, Will it be permanent? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sarcastic Dreamkiller wrote: It's not about the vehicle changes. The changes are being used as an excuse to remove the BPOs. It shows the level to which they will go to take things from us. I'm not concerned about any legal implications, I'm ...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.25 18:36:00
|
2180. BPOs, don't remove them. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: Saheiji wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Did anyone actually read the OP? -¼_-¼ and the stuck-up idea of calling yourself King of the Forums I am am the King of the Forums, and if you don't like it, tough. The Lady...
- by Chunky Munkey - at 2013.11.25 18:12:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |