| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1721. Naval Warfare!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Try Eve Online. It's like Dust, but not a turd.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.12 06:49:00
|
1722. ccp, you gonna balance the tanks? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Demonkiller 11 wrote: Yotta Guns wrote: I see a lot of posts, on the numbers of damage each kind of tank will take... Those same people keep forgetting that armor tanks can pack on much more HP, and their repers are much better, and they hav...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.12 06:46:00
|
1723. ccp, you gonna balance the tanks? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Yotta Guns wrote: Just wondering since shield tanks definitely need a buff and armor reps/resisters need a little bit of a Nerf ALONG WITH the shield buff. armor tanks are clearly better than shield. >:( NO MORE NERFS! Buff armor tanks ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.12 06:45:00
|
1724. Uprising has been the MAG equivalent of v1.03 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: I give $50 for chromosome back id give $60
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.12 06:42:00
|
1725. What if vehicle balance meant parts of the maps were indoors? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I hope CCP sees this.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.12 04:50:00
|
1726. Null cannon is OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
this thread is OP. needs a nerf.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.12 01:10:00
|
1727. What if vehicle balance meant parts of the maps were indoors? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: Frankly, initial thought: Terrible But afterwards: good idea. Open areas CAN be vehicles domination area while in cities they have absolutely no part, many areas they even cannot enter. BAMSIS. Everybody is happy.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.12 01:06:00
|
1728. What if vehicle balance meant parts of the maps were indoors? - in General Discussions [original thread]
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.12 00:17:00
|
1729. Post here if you get PSN disconnects and your internet is fine - in General Discussions [original thread]
x
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.12 00:13:00
|
1730. What if vehicle balance meant parts of the maps were indoors? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP, this is how we balance vehicles!
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.11 23:59:00
|
1731. What if vehicle balance meant parts of the maps were indoors? - in General Discussions [original thread]
EternalRMG wrote: OP this community needs more brains like yours soo... Get to a cloning station and clone yourself 1000 times then go to CCP head quarters and tell them your freaking BRILLIANT ideas, and if they dont listen clone yourself more...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.11 23:51:00
|
1732. What if vehicle balance meant parts of the maps were indoors? - in General Discussions [original thread]
[Reserved]
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.11 23:50:00
|
1733. What if vehicle balance meant parts of the maps were indoors? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crash Monster wrote: Novawolf McDustingham The514th wrote: They have shown zero interest in placing objectives in buildings or at defendable choke points, look at the domination maps - A perfectly good city/pyramid like 100 meters away from ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.11 23:37:00
|
1734. What if vehicle balance meant parts of the maps were indoors? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crash Monster wrote: Yeah, I'm not keen on it if we CAN'T go take our AV out and beat on tanks and jeeps. Also, in this world, it's going to be REALLY difficult to make a living as a sniper. CQC is no place for a sniper rifle I see your com...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.11 23:33:00
|
1735. What if vehicle balance meant parts of the maps were indoors? - in General Discussions [original thread]
EternalRMG wrote: This would give DS a purpose they could be used to travel SAFETLY between different locations in the upper part of the map, where the tanks are and LAVS can afford to go beacuse it would be insta death for them They might get ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.11 23:28:00
|
1736. Reserved - in General Discussions [original thread]
Okay, call me crazy here, but what if we buffed tanks AND made parts of the map where a tank could have 10,000 DPS and 50,000 HP, but it wouldnt matter because it couldnt access that part of the battlefield. (inside buildings, underground, skyscra...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.11 23:25:00
|
1737. What if vehicle balance meant parts of the maps were indoors? - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's brilliant! Literally everybody gets what they want! I play tanks to kill other tanks. If I never saw infantry, I really wouldn't care. I just wanna have tank battles at extreme ranges without worrying about some dumb punk with hacked AV nades...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.11 23:23:00
|
1738. What if vehicle balance meant parts of the maps were indoors? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Okay, call me crazy here, but what if we buffed tanks AND made parts of the map where a tank could have 10,000 DPS and 50,000 HP, but it wouldnt matter because it couldnt access that part of the battlefield. (inside buildings, underground, skyscra...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.11 23:17:00
|
1739. AV balence - in General Discussions [original thread]
A good solution would be to have parts of a map where infantry stand 0 chance and tank stand 0 chance IF they don't have people of the other kind helping them. A good example is the bridge map, but this means tanks get a buff, though, that buff wo...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.11 23:08:00
|
1740. AV balence - in General Discussions [original thread]
iceyburnz wrote: I hope CCP watches this and takes notes for thier soonTM MTACS. MTACs will be good at first, then theyll be worse than tanks if anyone gets more than 5 kills/battle with one.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.06.11 23:01:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |