| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
4841. In just 22 days (14/5/2014) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: And if you have a snare on the tank, none of that matters does it? He isn't going anywhere anytime soon. Right now if you put two guys with swarms on a tank, the tank will pr...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 12:35:00
|
4842. In just 22 days (14/5/2014) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: And if you have a snare on the tank, none of that matters does it? He isn't going anywhere anytime soon. Right now if you put two guys with swarms on a tank, the tank will probably get away. If you replaced one of thos...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 12:25:00
|
4843. In just 22 days (14/5/2014) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: In fact if it just got a damage buff, a person would take one hit from it, activate hardeners and GTFO. Your version of the plasma cannon would be worse than my version, versu...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 12:09:00
|
4844. In just 22 days (14/5/2014) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: In fact if it just got a damage buff, a person would take one hit from it, activate hardeners and GTFO. Your version of the plasma cannon would be worse than my version, versus pretty much anything. I'm sorry but 1150 ...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 12:01:00
|
4845. In just 22 days (14/5/2014) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: The only thing the plasma cannon needs is a snaring effect for anything hit by it, or its splash. It cannot ever be as powerful as a forge gun, because that would make comman...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 11:49:00
|
4846. In just 22 days (14/5/2014) - in General Discussions [original thread]
KalOfTheRathi wrote: Cat Merc wrote: The PLC will have been broken for a full year, without any buff in sight. The Pretty Light Cannon? If you mean the Plasma Cannon what does the L mean. Lob or Loser. Well, PC is already taken, so PLC.
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 11:47:00
|
4847. In just 22 days (14/5/2014) - in General Discussions [original thread]
ResistanceGTA wrote: Just wait, isn't their an Assault or Breach variant in the SDE? Soon it shall be god, and all of you who can destroy using the base variant shall be demi-gods when its new cousins arrive on the scene. I read the stats, th...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 11:06:00
|
4848. In just 22 days (14/5/2014) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: The only thing the plasma cannon needs is a snaring effect for anything hit by it, or its splash. It cannot ever be as powerful as a forge gun, because that would make commandos too good. It will not as good at killing...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 11:05:00
|
4849. In just 22 days (14/5/2014) - in General Discussions [original thread]
VALCORE72 wrote: needs to be more RPG vs shields not this arcing nad tosser . who ever who was thinkn the arc of it was cool needs there balls ripped off with a rusty hanger Also needs a damage increase... It's a close range AV weapon that h...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 10:27:00
|
4850. In just 22 days (14/5/2014) - in General Discussions [original thread]
The PLC will have been broken for a full year, without any buff in sight.
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 10:17:00
|
4851. Cyrius Li Moody Ion Pistol review - in General Discussions [original thread]
Talos Alomar wrote: I tried using the IoP a couple matches. I'd say your review hits all my thoughts on that weapon on the head. It has literally no redeeming qualities. The lowest range AND almost the lowest DPS? With the crap range then t...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 10:14:00
|
4852. Proof that armor tanking is superior to shield tanking - in General Discussions [original thread]
CRYPT3C W0LF wrote: Cat Merc wrote: CRYPT3C W0LF wrote: Sleepers live in a virtual world, so they don't use anything :P Also, Sleepers are the outcasts of the Jove after they left their Homeworld, so what ever the Jove use = the superior...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 00:27:00
|
4853. Proof that armor tanking is superior to shield tanking - in General Discussions [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: But jovian ships shield tank (mostly) Sleepers > Jovians
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 00:25:00
|
4854. Proof that armor tanking is superior to shield tanking - in General Discussions [original thread]
MrShooter01 wrote: The armor tanked sleeper drones are clearly defective ones. Notice how they don't have ANY shields, while even the gallente and amarr plebs have pathetic paintjob protectors That's obviously because their vastly superior sh...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 00:24:00
|
4855. Proof that armor tanking is superior to shield tanking - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fun fact: The Terran superweapon that Empress Jamyl used in the battle against the Elders collapsed ship's shields inwards. Interesting
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 00:17:00
|
4856. Proof that armor tanking is superior to shield tanking - in General Discussions [original thread]
CRYPT3C W0LF wrote: Sleepers live in a virtual world, so they don't use anything :P Also, Sleepers are the outcasts of the Jove after they left their Homeworld, so what ever the Jove use = the superior path Sleepers are the elite part of t...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 00:15:00
|
4857. Proof that armor tanking is superior to shield tanking - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sleepers don't use shields, they rely purely on armor. Hence Gallente and Amarr are on the right path
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 00:09:00
|
4858. The Battle of Vak'Atioth - in General Discussions [original thread]
As far as Jovians... Look at CONCORD. Those ships pack a punch, the frigates instantly warp in and lock you down with heavy fire, and if you survive for long enough, they bring in a battlecruiser who's cannon can... insta kill a titan. That's ri...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.22 00:05:00
|
4859. The Battle of Vak'Atioth - in General Discussions [original thread]
From the sounds of it, the Jovians had at most 30 ships in the batltle + that mothership. 10 ships for 200 doesn't sound too bad, considering the first one was a cheap shot at a frigate that's standing still lol
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.21 23:58:00
|
4860. The Battle of Vak'Atioth - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jacques Cayton II wrote: Sergamon Draco wrote: And the latter doesn't happen as often as one would think. No one ever counts the state I mean the entirety of the state can be mobilized around 96 hours. That's a big military that can come...
- by Cat Merc - at 2014.04.21 23:55:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |