| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1661. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sorry about the alt posting again. For the record, Jeb is me. I'm not sure why the setting keeps changing. Sorry for any confusion.
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 00:03:00
|
1662. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jathniel wrote: General purpose weapons will likely always have the most kills. Balance is lacking when a weapon, ANY weapon, can't fulfill it's role (plasma cannon, laser rifle). OR, supplants the role of another weapon of a particular niche(...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 23:55:00
|
1663. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Delta 749 wrote: Over used =/= over powered Sorry you are not a winner, please try again It does because to be OP, a weapon must hurt overall diversity. Like the AR.
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 23:52:00
|
1664. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bob Teller wrote: Wepons that are used more are not op,they are just used more...That is some twisted way to try to (prove) that the flaylock is not OP.This sure show how people get attached to their precious op guns and are willing to do anyth...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 23:50:00
|
1665. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
First Prophet wrote: Unless you go and get an actually decent sample size, this data is completely useless. Please feel free to provide better data. Until then, this is the best we have.
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 23:49:00
|
1666. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Buster Friently wrote: I've implored people to check out the killfeed so they can see, themselves, which weapons are dominating the game. I'm shocked that the generalist weapon is being used the most in a game that forces...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 23:30:00
|
1667. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Actually, no, it doesn't undermine my claim. An OP weapon damages diversity. The Flaylock isn't, the AR is. No, if a weapon is effective for people that use it, that is an indication of viability, not...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 23:25:00
|
1668. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Marston VC wrote: Quote: Actually it does mean it's OP. Look at it this way, if everyone wants to use that weapon, to the exclusion of the other weapons that diversify the game, it means the weapon is too desirable, and is damaging diversity...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 23:02:00
|
1669. Petition to nerf sorry "balance" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Some actual data for you: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=92678&find=unread
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 22:52:00
|
1670. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jathniel wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Jathniel wrote: You can't possible consider this scientific, accurate, or even logical to follow. If anything, this is everything that is wrong with popular science today. Numbers from one match is ...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 22:45:00
|
1671. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
FATPrincess - XOXO wrote: Nevermind. -XOXO Did you even read my response? Have at it.
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 22:43:00
|
1672. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
FATPrincess - XOXO wrote: For any given statistic, you should always get the largest number of tries possible. I think 10 games should be a minimum. Next, skirmish matches are entirely different from ambush and domination matches. I know this b...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 22:42:00
|
1673. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jathniel wrote: You can't possible consider this scientific, accurate, or even logical to follow. If anything, this is everything that is wrong with popular science today. Numbers from one match is inconclusive data. Numbers from one match, wi...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 22:40:00
|
1674. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Marston VC wrote: 1.) SMG's in my opinion are overpowered (especially the proto version) HOWEVER this weapon has missed out on the nerf hammer because i...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 22:38:00
|
1675. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Marston VC wrote: 1.) SMG's in my opinion are overpowered (especially the proto version) HOWEVER this weapon has missed out on the nerf hammer because it's an under used weapon. It doesn't get reall...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 22:17:00
|
1676. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Buster Friently wrote: So, I've seen, and commented on, the typical "it's not AR so nerf it posts" and have tried to explain that just because something kills you, but isn't an AR, that doesn't mean it's OP. I've implored p...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 22:13:00
|
1677. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: All i'm gonna say is... I hope CCP knows now not to balance weapons by their use in public matches, and instead by their use in organized corp matches (see planetary conquest). Planetary conquest represent a tiny minority ...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 22:12:00
|
1678. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Marston VC wrote: 1.) SMG's in my opinion are overpowered (especially the proto version) HOWEVER this weapon has missed out on the nerf hammer because it's an under used weapon. It doesn't get reallllyyy good until you have the ishukone assault...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 22:11:00
|
1679. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Severance Pay wrote: He just likes OPness. He has one in his mouth. Very mature. I've gone out of my way to be as unbiased and scientific as I can, and provide real, useful data, and this is the best you can comment with? Interesting.
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 22:04:00
|
1680. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
hooc order wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: Please everyone... Just ignore this guy. Don't even bother posting in this thread, just let it die. No. I probably disagree with his analysis (didn't ever really read it)...but the numbers are interes...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 21:58:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |