| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Sticky:[Feedback] Roadmap 2015 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: BursegSardaukar wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: It appears that I'll have to be very diligent in this thread. PC discussion always get lost in complex issues when the number one concern should be, "How do we get thousan...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2014.12.24 18:59:00
|
2. Sticky:[Feedback] Roadmap 2015 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: It appears that I'll have to be very diligent in this thread. PC discussion always get lost in complex issues when the number one concern should be, "How do we get thousands and thousands of players involved instead of hun...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2014.12.24 18:43:00
|
3. Sticky:[Feedback] Roadmap 2015 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: In my opinion making these attackable in Eve would be a TERRIBLE idea. There's just not enough interest overall for there to be the type of Eve support necessary to protect such assets. You'd end up needing every single D...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2014.12.24 16:03:00
|
4. Sticky:[Feedback] Roadmap 2015 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Will these war barges be visible EVE side? Are they both offensive and defense? Will it be possible to hinder/help them in space? Will it be possible for an EVE ship to act as an interim war barge on a district and provide bonuses?
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2014.12.24 15:00:00
|
5. Sticky:[Feedback] Armor Modules - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Change bonuses on the suits themselves instead of the plates/reppers. Allow Amarrian suits in certain roles to bonus the HP gained from plates, same with Gallente and reppers/reactive plates. That way reppers themselves won't be OP, but using th...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2014.05.16 16:14:00
|
6. Proposed Ideas to Improve Planetary Conquest - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like the idea of dropping the passive ISK generation. If a district fills up, the clones should stop being produced and the owner should have to manually sell them, which opens the district to attack. But I think even that isn't going quite fa...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2014.04.06 16:28:00
|
7. [Feedback] Nice work CCP! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
gt56yhnb wrote: Veka Kari wrote: CCP thank you for the great work that you put into this update. Heres hoping Logi's get a little more attention than a nerf in 1.8! how about prohibiting damage mods on all logi suits so that they can actu...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.12.10 20:18:00
|
8. [Request] Let District Owners Earn ISK from taxing EVE PI structures. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Draco Cerberus wrote: BursegSardaukar wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: sounds like a good idea.... if there was any way to get the isk from eve down to dust which there currently is not. and by the time that comes in there will be no need to ear...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.10.22 19:58:00
|
9. Sticky:Factional Contract Match Changes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
XEROO COOL wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: I run million-ISK tanks. What's to stop some asshat from dropping REs from a fresh alt to ruin my day? Again and again and again? Pilots have a lot to lose from this mechanic. Far more than anyone...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.10.18 18:46:00
|
10. Sticky:Factional Contract Match Changes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: I run million-ISK tanks. What's to stop some asshat from dropping REs from a fresh alt to ruin my day? Again and again and again? Pilots have a lot to lose from this mechanic. Far more than anyone else does. This i...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.10.18 18:23:00
|
11. Announcement:Factional Contract Changes Introduction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
These changes do sound awesome. I did post a request in the matchmaking thread , and have a larger question that doesn't seem to be addressed: Will there be a way for Dust mercs to attack a specific district, creating the match contract themselv...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.10.18 18:07:00
|
12. Sticky:Factional Contract Match Changes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
As far as the bombardment goes, can you open the FW ones up to Corporation/Alliances in addition to the militia? The problem: I want to partake in FW on the ground, but restricting my entire Alliance to only play a single type of FW contracts to ...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.10.18 17:59:00
|
13. [Request] Let District Owners Earn ISK from taxing EVE PI structures. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: sounds like a good idea.... if there was any way to get the isk from eve down to dust which there currently is not. and by the time that comes in there will be no need to earn isk that way. My dream is that the primary mea...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.10.15 19:07:00
|
14. [Request] Let District Owners Earn ISK from taxing EVE PI structures. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DaNizzle4shizle wrote: BursegSardaukar wrote: DaNizzle4shizle wrote: every1 listen!. if 1 or 2 corps take all of molden heath, ccp with be forced to bring out new star systems. just keep complaining about only a couple of corps taking all...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.10.04 15:19:00
|
15. [Feedback/Request] Temporary Orbital Support Rights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Adelia Lafayette wrote: I want to see eve fleets and dust squads linked together for PC and further interaction down the road. My guys were saying that same thing last night as we were parked over Oddelulf. It sucks sitting in space, not kno...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.10.03 19:56:00
|
16. [Request] Let District Owners Earn ISK from taxing EVE PI structures. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DaNizzle4shizle wrote: every1 listen!. if 1 or 2 corps take all of molden heath, ccp with be forced to bring out new star systems. just keep complaining about only a couple of corps taking all the fun out if districts. Not sure what your ta...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.10.03 18:25:00
|
17. afk timer - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
They don't want to sit around in the MCC spinning around. The problem was they'd join a match, then sit AFK in the MCC. I think an AFK boot is fair, and a great solution to that AFK nonsense. If you have to **** you have the whole lobby timer to g...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.10.03 17:34:00
|
18. [Feedback/Request] Temporary Orbital Support Rights - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I disagree. Until CCP actually implements a contracting system that makes it visible who will be fighting a match on behalf of another corp (and remove the ringer concept entirely), it should be required that the bombers be in the same Alliance as...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.10.03 17:32:00
|
19. Dust corps need a log of who fought in which PC battles When - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hell, I'd like a way as an Alliance leader to know which of Corps are fighting when without requiring them to mail me. But yea, at the micro-scale this would be extremely useful as well.
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.10.03 17:26:00
|
20. [Suggestion] The SP Buyback System - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I know some people hate CCP's method of being stuck with what you chose, but it would murder specialization and really break any type of data collection if people could respec. Even if its on a short term basis, in the limited fashion as you descr...
- by BursegSardaukar - at 2013.10.03 17:20:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |