| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 |
41. Does PC cater to 1% of the playerbase? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kovinis Sparagas wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Kovinis Sparagas wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: What did you want? 64v64? Dust can't support it. Devs said it can No, hardware spec on ps3 says gtfo. Son... I think you don't know your...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.27 13:19:00
|
42. Does PC cater to 1% of the playerbase? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: But this is so telling of how people are in real life. Here we have DNS controlling most of MH. What does the majority do? They just whine about it. Want CCP to step in and change it. Instead of sitting down with other merc...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.27 13:15:00
|
43. I cant scan them.... Gallente scouts - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aszazel wrote: If at the end of going slot for slot, the Gal will STILL get below the CAL, why don't you quit bitching about the HOW MANY modules it would require, this whole topic is about defeating the one suit you aren't meant to defeat. Acc...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.27 11:55:00
|
44. I cant scan them.... Gallente scouts - in General Discussions [original thread]
JARREL THOMAS wrote: The Gallente scouts are monsters my Caldari scout cant find them the unscanable ones 2 complex damps...... *starts hitting head on wall* But really thats a bit unfair thats like a heavy with more hp than what damage the g...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.27 11:53:00
|
45. the level of debate on the fourm - in General Discussions [original thread]
steadyhand amarr wrote: what does my corp have to do with anyone or are you typical person who discriminates and stereotypes people based on where you find them rather than getting to know them. quoted poster...part of the problem Wha-? B...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 20:35:00
|
46. Pyrex has a point - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: He hasnt mentioned the fact that those proto stompers actually are part of the ecconomic from dust. Sure they dont buy AUR but they stomp the opposition which means the guys who had a really bad day might spend some money ...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 20:33:00
|
47. Shared squad precision should be removed. - in General Discussions [original thread]
ratamaq doc wrote: How about this for the ones stating that this gives the scout a purpose in a squad, why don't you use that neat little scouting tool called an active scanner to light up what your personal passives are picking up? You have an...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 15:02:00
|
48. Pyrex has a point - in General Discussions [original thread]
well said, little argument from me.
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 14:27:00
|
49. Shared squad precision should be removed. - in General Discussions [original thread]
DEZKA DIABLO wrote: King Amaterasu wrote: Its worse than being scanned in 1.7 because now they don't have to scan. All you need is one cal scout with 2-4 precision enhancers and they can see almost everyone. you need a gal scout with 2-3 dam...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 14:25:00
|
50. How many people here have played less than 5 games in pc? - in General Discussions [original thread]
NAV HIV wrote: I have never played a game Good don't. You're not missing much. SUP DUDE!
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 13:43:00
|
51. Shared squad precision should be removed. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: BrotherofHavok wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: Just to clarify, in 1.4 they removed "all" passive scan sharing. What this SHOULD have meant is that they ACTUALLY removed all sharing of passive scans, but what it A...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 12:07:00
|
52. the level of debate on the fourm - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: steadyhand amarr wrote: Jack McReady wrote: #gitgud I do not understand this troll please explain so i can respond correctly He's using poor phonetics. "Git" is meant to mean "get", in spite of the word being ...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 11:58:00
|
53. Remove squads from pub matches. - in General Discussions [original thread]
m twiggz wrote: In all honestly do what we all did when we were new. Save SP for relevant skills, not throwing it around worthlessly. Find a group of friends to play with, or join a corp. Save up ISK. Get protosuit. Use protosuit against protos...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 11:51:00
|
54. Remove squads from pub matches. - in General Discussions [original thread]
TechMechMeds wrote: If you know about telefrag matches then I love you If we're thinking the same thing (unreal tournament) then it was a love/hate relationship. Sometimes it was really fun running around and teleporting into people to kill t...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 11:50:00
|
55. Shared squad precision should be removed. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: Just to clarify, in 1.4 they removed "all" passive scan sharing. What this SHOULD have meant is that they ACTUALLY removed all sharing of passive scans, but what it ACTUALLY meant was that players would be intermittentl...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 11:46:00
|
56. Remove squads from pub matches. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mass Holer wrote: Anyway, I'll leave with this question. If you were a new player, which option out of the two most adversely affects your playing experience? -Fighting against several organized corp squads in a single public match? -Fightin...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 11:40:00
|
57. Shared squad precision should be removed. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Toby Flenderson wrote: Poonmunch wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Passive scans aren't shared, it has been this way since about 1.4/1.5 which is why you had so much scanner spam. This is true. It was removed. I remember it well. But are sc...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 11:29:00
|
58. Shared squad precision should be removed. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zahle Undt wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: King Amaterasu wrote: Its worse than being scanned in 1.7 because now they don't have to scan. All you need is one cal scout with 2-4 precision enhancers and they can see almost everyone. you need a...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 11:27:00
|
59. Shared squad precision should be removed. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ludvig Enraga wrote: BrotherofHavok wrote: King Amaterasu wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Passive scans aren't shared, it has been this way since about 1.4/1.5 which is why you had so much scanner spam. Yes they are. people in 1.7 didn't us...
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 11:21:00
|
60. Shared squad precision should be removed. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: People are grabbing straws now it seems..... I got a box of them. You want one?
- by BrotherofHavok - at 2014.04.17 03:07:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |