| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
2121. Horrible idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
You nerfed scout profiles. Now how are we supposed to avoid active scanners!
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 22:19:00
|
2122. Who's going to take the armour challenge? - in General Discussions [original thread]
G/1 Series Scout In your two lows set up two reactive plates. It's better than a ferroscale + armor rep, at basic level, because you receive more HP and 2 HP/S repped of armor with no movement penalty. When I tank.....
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 22:12:00
|
2123. Laser squads?? clone bacon??? - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: You mean disco squads? F*ck the Ghostbusters, cross those beams people. Aero and I have already tested what happens when streams cross. No disaster except for those we aim at. And one special m...
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 22:08:00
|
2124. Passive Scanning: The Test Results - in General Discussions [original thread]
tastzlike chicken wrote: More useful, concisely worded gifts of knowledge? Freaks. There's a diagram for the hard-of-reading and a TLDR
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 22:03:00
|
2125. Squad Orders and Blob Combat? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beren Hurin wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: Actually I know for a fact that Rally Command works Place the rally command over someone and works just like a defend order I know Attack works but it's so hard to make use of it So is there a f...
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 22:01:00
|
2126. Passive Scanning: The Test Results - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quil Evrything wrote: Speaking of which.. turns out that enemy uplink detection is now also a good test of passive scanning. They seem to disappear outside of passive scan range now. (Unless of course you get them in your crosshairs :-/ ) ...
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 21:48:00
|
2127. Passive Scanning: The Test Results - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well, I feel good now about putting all that SP into scanning skills. I would like to say "There is no official excuse now..." but I'd like to test some areas a little more thoroughly and see about any potential glitches but when Reav and I worked...
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 21:23:00
|
2128. Squad Orders and Blob Combat? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Actually I know for a fact that Rally Command works Place the rally command over someone and works just like a defend order I know Attack works but it's so hard to make use of it
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 20:55:00
|
2129. You have been scanned - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iskandar Zul Karnain wrote: Need a stealth scanner that doesn't alert the scanned merc. F that noise Mine usually says "Scan Prevented" but then people get smart and have scanners with precision below 30 DB D:<
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 19:33:00
|
2130. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Daxxis KANNAH wrote: First Prophet wrote: Does anybody remember AOL? I'm sure many in here are old enough to even remember AOL or Netscape. Even IE might be foreign to people in certain areas. Netscape!
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 19:02:00
|
2131. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Daxxis KANNAH wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: 5710 - voidfaction (670, -0.62) Is voidfaction newly a scout? This data would suggest so....or 1.4 hit hard. God, that **** never happens to medium frames... Void could have been testing his th...
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 18:54:00
|
2132. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
5710 - voidfaction (670, -0.62) Is voidfaction newly a scout? This data would suggest so....or 1.4 hit hard. God, that **** never happens to medium frames...
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 18:44:00
|
2133. Forge Guns are Broken - in General Discussions [original thread]
People don't get over the top defensive Funk has a good point. It is an easy weapon to use, combined with the fact it can OHK and has splash should you miss. It's AV and Anti Infantry, it's anti materiel. I'm thinking we shrink the overall proj...
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 18:39:00
|
2134. Passive Scanning: The Test Results - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quil Evrything wrote: First of all, there's an additional twist to the LOS stuff. Some things may not just show up on your radar, even in your LOS view ... UNLESS you specifically run your crosshairs over them. Technically, its (crosshairs, p...
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 18:18:00
|
2135. Observations on passive vs active scanning - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Test Results Reav's Guide Yep I was wrong. What I was mislead by is I was frequently having radar blips appear in my front viewing angle even though I wasn't seeing them while my merc was. I made some wrong assumptions but it's all clari...
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 17:26:00
|
2136. Passive Scanning: The Test Results - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sana Rayya wrote: Great info. Would like to see an addendum with active scanning as well :) Active Scanning is pretty straightforward but I think I will test what creates margin of errors (it's supposed to be people with lower profile so I he...
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 17:20:00
|
2137. The funniest name you've seen in Dust. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hammerhead Landshark
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 05:29:00
|
2138. Dropship blindsiding, why is this a thing now? - in General Discussions [original thread]
AAGMUNDR wrote: Being a mercenary is business. Using 60k isk to smash your pi+¦ata of tears out of the sky not only makes perfect business sense, but also is fun and hilarious. I suppose using Charybdis to road kill Proto suits was acceptabl...
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 05:27:00
|
2139. Passive Scanning: The Test Results - in General Discussions [original thread]
Reav Hannari wrote: I have sinned. Forgive me. Remembered one test: active scanners do not make you appear on the enemy TACNET. I think this was intended at one point. Not sure if it was ever in game. Yeah but maybe I should have changed...
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 05:25:00
|
2140. Passive Scanning: The Test Results - in General Discussions [original thread]
Reav Hannari wrote: I also got to see the aim assist adhesion affect during our tests but Bojo kept jumping and it would lose track of him. It's not very sticky which is a good thing. And the thread has been cursed
- by Bojo The Mighty - at 2013.09.19 05:01:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |