| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
3001. So you know..OMS sucks compared to normal. Leave battle - in General Discussions [original thread]
JudgeIsABadPilot wrote: It will be peaceful when crybabys like you stop gaming and let things exist as the developers intend. Why don't you get good, and move to Call of Duty? I think it would be an even more peaceful place when players who ...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.23 18:33:00
|
3002. No railgun, no vehicle balance - in General Discussions [original thread]
@Void Echo Is it really? Let's break down his post shall we? Thumb Green wrote: No it really wasn't. There were a few AV'er saying vehicles needed to be tougher but it was overwhelmingly vehicle users that were demanding changes. This is ...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.23 16:19:00
|
3003. lost my consecutive days played dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Guys, stop making excuses. The concrete point remains, those who talk about leaving still come to the forums. That's what I said in my post and it is truth. You also said: Quote: So in other words, if you're talking ...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.23 12:29:00
|
3004. [Petition] Give Assaults 2 primary slots and Remove Commandos - in General Discussions [original thread]
That's a terrible idea on so many ways that I don't even know where to start. Also : CCP Rattati wrote: Commando will not be removed, nor Assault given two weapons in DUST 514
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.23 07:07:00
|
3005. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Sigh. Again, shut up boy. That's the best you've got? Surely someone as calm, collected, and intelelgent as you could come up with something better than that right? Michael Arck wrote: I wish I could punch you in th...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.23 06:48:00
|
3006. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Atiim wrote: Michael Arck wrote: I say no because what's the use when they will just be complained about and nerfed into nothing anyway by the community? Again, another situation where community cried nerf and then ch...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.23 05:53:00
|
3007. so it's pretty obvious that everyone hates tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
GeneralButtNaked wrote: You need to learn what a fallacy is before you start trying to sound smart. An opinion cannot be fallacious doubly so when it is obviously anecdotal. I of course can only speak of the pubs that I have stomped, but the s...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.23 01:05:00
|
3008. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vulpes Dolosus wrote: I do not want Logistic vehicles without proper and viable logistic modules and/or turrets to make them actual support vehicles. Not just tankier versions of STD frames. I'd like a return of the Shield/Armor Transporters,...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.23 00:31:00
|
3009. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: I say no because what's the use when they will just be complained about and nerfed into nothing anyway by the community? Again, another situation where community cried nerf and then changes their mind later on, completely f...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.23 00:20:00
|
3010. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Atiim wrote: I want SLAVEs back, as their high-efficiency not only made them ideal for menial labour when you need a break in the afternoon, but it was also a fun thing to use the lesser races. The Low Down Slavess shou...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.23 00:19:00
|
3011. so it's pretty obvious that everyone hates tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
GeneralButtNaked wrote: Because of scrubs like you. Unable to get it done on the ground, you cried. I knew CCP was family oriented, but I thought that was in their workplace, not their development. Hardcore Eve became mild, watered down ...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.23 00:11:00
|
3012. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahashi Kashuken wrote: But you wanted this That's a strawman fallacy, but good attempt at trolling. Takahashi Kashuken wrote: You wanted vehicles to be nerfed until they became nothing but useless again You cried and cried and crie...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.23 00:08:00
|
3013. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
LLAVs would go quite nicely with the HP/s nerf of Armor Repairers, as it would create an incentive to use teamwork, and would serve as a true Support Vehicle. I want SLAVs back, as their high-speed not only made them ideal for transport when you ...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.22 23:53:00
|
3014. so it's pretty obvious that everyone hates tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alpha 443-6732 wrote: What's stopping high quality feedback from being the foundation of a balanced game? Nothing. In fact, that is the foundation of a balanced game. Why do you think they nerfed HAVs?
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.22 23:20:00
|
3015. The Return of the Assault Ck.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
axis alpha wrote: For a suit that is the weakest Troll or Lol?
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.22 21:14:00
|
3016. lost my consecutive days played dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Everyone who has ever posted "I am leaving" thread has always, always continued to visit the forums. So in other words, if you're talking about it, that means you're coming back. That's not necessarily true. Former addi...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.22 20:56:00
|
3017. so it's pretty obvious that everyone hates tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
GeneralButtNaked wrote: Here is why you are wrong: Pub players suck. Solo players play pubs. This assertion would be valid if you've actually taken the time to sample every single player who plays Public Contracts to determine whether or ...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.22 20:13:00
|
3018. Slot layout - in General Discussions [original thread]
ROMULUS H3X wrote: Let me add the REAL reason the Heavy should have more slot layout than EVERY OTHER SUIT and why the scout should have multiple modules removed. Ready? Simply because of their size difference. The HEAVY being the size that ...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.22 14:53:00
|
3019. so it's pretty obvious that everyone hates tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alpha 443-6732 wrote: This is why PC stats should've always taken priority. A game-mode that is irrelevant to nearly 80% of the playerbase should never hold priority over anything. "Balance for PC" is a myth, as the problems that exist wi...
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.22 14:42:00
|
3020. So all the i win button tankers have now moved to skirm and dom. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: Atiim wrote: It's rather sad actually. The only ones who even bother putting up a fight are those with 20GJ Railguns attached. Isn't this what av wanted? Why is it sad? No, no it's not. Not even remotely.
- by Atiim - at 2014.06.22 14:37:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |