| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
361. scrubby takers defending broken tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Slag Emberforge wrote: TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: Seems more interesting than Infantry 514. Dust is about immortal mercenaries not immortal tanks. Dust is about warfare involving immortal mercs, not the mercs themselves. You think E...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 23:33:00
|
362. Plasma Cannon and Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: PLC is a beast against tanks without their hardeners on. grab level 1 in it and see for yourself :P long live the PLC (if your trying to kill a tank while its hardeners are on then your doing it...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 23:31:00
|
363. Plasma Cannon and Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: PLC is a beast against tanks without their hardeners on. grab level 1 in it and see for yourself :P long live the PLC (if your trying to kill a tank while its hardeners are on then your doing it wrong, or your a tan...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 23:29:00
|
364. So CCP Devs Lets Talk "Stasis Webifier's" - in General Discussions [original thread]
BMSTUBBY wrote: Someone already posted. :^)
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 23:26:00
|
365. Hey CCP! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Forlorn Destrier wrote: TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: The first day tanks are allowed to see sunlight and the infantry514 forum death squads are already trying to shove them back into the basement. Kind of sad - it's a bit more balanced. Ve...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 23:24:00
|
366. Hey CCP! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Parson Atreides wrote: N1ck Comeau wrote: My forge laughs. People are just mad that they can't solo a tank anymore. People with Swarm Launchers, AV grenades and Plasma Cannons are mad because they're all useless against any semi-compe...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 23:22:00
|
367. Hilmar this morning - in General Discussions [original thread]
crazy space 1 wrote: Wakes up, checks ps3 and updates Dust. It's still a fun game. Plays for 2 hours Rage quits and fires 12 people before christmas to put more money into dust before it ruins CCP since they have spent over 25 million on this...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 23:16:00
|
368. Hey CCP! - in General Discussions [original thread]
skippy678 wrote: Why dont you just give vehicles a turret that shoots orbitals? or even make the madrugars have wings to fly? and you know just take swarms and FG out of the game...it wouldnt change anything anyway. not working as intended ...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 23:09:00
|
369. Tanks are Awesome - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sev Alcatraz wrote: They are finally where they are supposed to be, now just give AV a 'Slight" buff and everything will be fine WEBIFIERS
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 23:06:00
|
370. CCP can we have some webifiers?!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
THE GREY CARDINAL wrote: Vehicle slowing stasis webifiers were mentioned in Advancing the Core presentation at Fanfest this year. I dare say we might be getting some goodies in 1.8 to help level the playing field. Didn't they say something ...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 23:04:00
|
371. CCP Congrats on 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
skippy678 wrote: they should **** can the guys who thinks vehicles are balanced now. :^)
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 22:59:00
|
372. Not even going to deal with 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
darkiller240 wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: What seems to be the problem? Tanks Tanks are the problem ( o and also the combat rifle is appertly OP, but not a big deal) you n igger flux grenades didn't get nerfed, PLC didn't get ne...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 22:54:00
|
373. Not even going to deal with 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: I played an hour. Just no. Wow-Not even. This goes beyond regular complaining, it's the type of mad you get where you literally can't portray it, even with your face. I apologize to anyone I told to calm down yesterday, I h...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 22:40:00
|
374. Everything is Fine with the New HAVs, Except for the Acceleration and Top Speed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Discuss. Also nag CCP for webifiers if they want to keep the current speed.
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 20:42:00
|
375. Fill me in about the new tanks! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Exmaple Core wrote: Are tanks now well, tanks? Or are they even worse than before? How is the gunlogi now, is it useable? Tanking as a whole, better or worse? Details What im trying to ask is; are tanks still sh~t? Does having SP into vehicl...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 08:26:00
|
376. Small Railguns are the Rail Rifles of Small Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
crazy space 1 wrote: and assault dropships get a 50% increase in their RoF I actually really like that change, it's like it has 4 turrets now : ) With what skill?
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 08:25:00
|
377. Small Railguns are the Rail Rifles of Small Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Seriously, they are amazing now. They remind me of the turrets put on old ww2 armored cars.
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 08:18:00
|
378. How do u **** up this bad CCP... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Please don't
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 00:35:00
|
379. Should AV add Debuffs on vehicles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Churning in my head a bit on how to make AV 'threatening' to vehicles considering that I just went a round where I parked a maddy and just ate everything shot at me by infantry. (approximately ate about 15 av shots and on...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.11 00:31:00
|
380. Ok stop the raging , Tanks are ridiculously OP we all know it - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: Alpha 443-6732 wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: Alpha 443-6732 wrote: darkiller240 wrote: we all know it "Why won't my heavily armor based weapon damage a shield based vehicle with his modules on??!???? :(" -you How...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2013.12.10 23:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |