Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
21. large blasters - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Logibro wrote: I'm still considering increasing the dispersion decay, which will make it easier and quicker to pulse bursts. I might also consider reducing the dispersion rate at the low end but increase it at the high end, again to help ke...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.22 14:21:00
|
22. Small Blaster Turrets, the good and bad. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Leovarian L Lavitz wrote: The driver never stops driving o.o. That = dead lav Confirmed for never using an LAV with a gunner ever. Enjoy hitting nothing due to poor hit detection while your driver frantically drives in pointless circles
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.22 01:07:00
|
23. Small Blaster Turrets, the good and bad. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I believe that CCP made the dispersion that great so that we could hit infantry on the move without needing to stop to increase accuracy - that's a big nono. It would be a much better experience to have to learn how to gun on the move while havin...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.21 21:10:00
|
24. Small Blaster Turrets, the good and bad. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Since you are testing, can you try firing at the ground as well. There is supposed to be a small splash that was added some time ago, but never advertised. Tested it again tonight, didn't even take long ...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.21 21:06:00
|
25. Dear CCP, Please Revert the Small Blaster Dispersion ASAP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kurai Ronin wrote: Alpha 443-6732 wrote: This is the one change I've literally been waiting for my entire dust career - for an LAV to mean something more than just a taxi. Seriously, the only thing holding the turret back now is the horren...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.21 20:59:00
|
26. Yeah.... The plasma cannon needs a lot of work before it's viabl... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Alpha 443-6732 wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Alpha 443-6732 wrote: Cat Merc wrote: After attempting to kill tanks with the proto plasma cannon for... quite some time, I switched to my proto swarms for comparison. There is...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.21 15:36:00
|
27. Yeah.... The plasma cannon needs a lot of work before it's viabl... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Alpha 443-6732 wrote: Cat Merc wrote: After attempting to kill tanks with the proto plasma cannon for... quite some time, I switched to my proto swarms for comparison. There is no comparison. The swarm launcher wrecks ta...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.21 15:29:00
|
28. Yeah.... The plasma cannon needs a lot of work before it's viabl... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: After attempting to kill tanks with the proto plasma cannon for... quite some time, I switched to my proto swarms for comparison. There is no comparison. The swarm launcher wrecks tanker face if they make a mistake (damage mod...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.21 14:58:00
|
29. give vehicles their skills back. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: SCATTORSHOT RINNEGATE wrote: The old mods were perfect before this **** sorry but is the truth, i want my Enforcers/Marauders/BO's back with the PG/CPU that you promised to change! I Can't see a tank with rep and hardene...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.21 14:42:00
|
30. Charlie must address the rail rifles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Chuck Nurris DCLXVI wrote: Too fast, too far, too accurate. Add faster overheat, and increase the spread, especially increase it if the user is moving. Nerfing it anymore will probably make it the most useless rifle of them all. Please don't
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.21 14:36:00
|
31. Why dont you just delete vehicles? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sequal Rise wrote: As an infantry player who went through uprising 1.0 till now, I'm really happy to see you tankers complaining about dying Indeed, I think tanks are in a good place now, even though I agree that they dont have enough choice ...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.21 14:33:00
|
32. Why dont you just delete vehicles? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: we deffinatly should not revert to pre 1.6 it would be a step backwards, however if the pre 1.7 modules were reintorduced as well as keeping what we have now it wouldbe a giant step foward toward ture vehicle...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.20 23:30:00
|
33. Why dont you just delete vehicles? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Takahashi Kashuken wrote: We have less vehicle hulls and the ones that are not deleted have less slots so less fitting options We have less vehicle modules so again less fitting options which lead to triple rep maddys because other modules ar...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.20 23:15:00
|
34. [Feedback] Small Rail Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
and yes I just replied 3 times have another bump you giant faggo
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.20 23:04:00
|
35. [Feedback] Small Rail Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Baal Omniscient wrote: @All, Ratatti has spoken. I shall now go spread the word that cheap Thales with slight range reductions are available in the marketplace and are equippable to all vehicles with no SP investment. Have fun. o7 That...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.20 23:03:00
|
36. [Feedback] Small Rail Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
also, the railgun and the sniper rifle are will never be in direct competition; there's nothing stopping someone from large railgunning your ass off your perch. Sniper rifles are just generally easier to use, have more range, hitscan, etc.
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.20 22:59:00
|
37. [Feedback] Small Rail Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The last thing we need is another useless small turret. If anything, the small rail needs a buff to hit detection.
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.20 22:57:00
|
38. Dear CCP, Please Revert the Small Blaster Dispersion ASAP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Alpha 443-6732 wrote: Mossellia Delt wrote: I'm finding small blasters now work on ADS So, possibly they could have maybe half or a third of the dispersion? I know it's pretty hard to maintain aim on an ADS... Or remov...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.19 12:29:00
|
39. Dear CCP, Please Revert the Small Blaster Dispersion ASAP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mossellia Delt wrote: I'm finding small blasters now work on ADS So, possibly they could have maybe half or a third of the dispersion? I know it's pretty hard to maintain aim on an ADS...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.18 22:54:00
|
40. Dear CCP, Please Revert the Small Blaster Dispersion ASAP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This is the one change I've literally been waiting for my entire dust career - for an LAV to mean something more than just a taxi. Seriously, the only thing holding the turret back now is the horrendous dispersion. The hit detection is pretty go...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.06.18 21:11:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |