| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
621. Petition for New Vehicle Changes to be Thrown in the Meatgrinder in Favor of Add... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Noc Tempre wrote: Alpha 443-6732 wrote: Now would be the perfect time, as we are going back to the "fundamentals!" Capacitor adds a stronger link to the eve universe, more strategies for building vehicles, adds more control that a vehicle o...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.02 21:58:00
|
622. All this crying about vehicle changes... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: I don't like how these changes is a step back in terms of diversity (ie no different turrets/vehicles) I think they need to fix some typos (Like blaster damage) Other than that I can't effiectively say these changes are...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.02 21:53:00
|
623. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Noc Tempre wrote: Vehicles are losing a lot of health and flexibility. Ammo is being added on top of heat for more worries but at no benefit such as ammo selection. Shields, traditionally the anti infantry option, is now completely losing the ...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.02 21:51:00
|
624. All this crying about vehicle changes... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lurchasaurus wrote: Alldin Kan wrote: Ever considered the fact that CCP is also going to be tweaking AV and that the stats shown are not final? Guess not. Feedback is a major part of releasing the numbers. You are complaining because peop...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.02 21:42:00
|
625. After some thought, 3 LOWs isn't SO bad on a Maddy. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spycrab Potato wrote: I mean come on, most of us have 2 PG upgrades there anyway. And now that repair mods require A LOT less, I think it will be fine. Maddy will always win in a Blaster fight if it has 2 complex heavy reps and a hardener.
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.02 21:39:00
|
626. All this crying about vehicle changes... - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Alldin Kan wrote: Ever considered the fact that CCP is also going to be tweaking AV? Guess not. Dropships are so beast Assault is the only one requiring REAL work, AV just needs a nerf.
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.02 21:35:00
|
627. Vehicleers, Remain Calm. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: With this post informing us of some major changes to come in the future with vehicles, understandably some of you are concerned about the future and how it will affect you and your enjoyment of the game. We must keep an ...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.02 21:32:00
|
628. All this crying about vehicle changes... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ever considered the fact that CCP is also going to be tweaking AV and that the stats shown are not final? Guess not.
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.02 21:30:00
|
629. 1.7 is toilet :) - in General Discussions [original thread]
The legend345 wrote: You've simply eliminated problems and added new ones. So i will not even WASTE my time in telling you how to fix that puzzle of **** that you posted. Instead ill will tell you what the problem is right now (for tanks). 1st ...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.02 21:29:00
|
630. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
The legend345 wrote: This is terrible all of it. Its SOOO BAD are you kidding me ccp? Throw all this garbage away, yes its all garbage. Throw it away and simply buff the tanks now. You guys preached how your gonna change tanking blah blah blah ...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.02 21:22:00
|
631. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Logibro wrote: Hi guys, ...[/i] Gathering Data... complete! Analyzing Data... complete! Processing... Error: Unable to determine balance for Active Hardeners (fitting combinations with total CPU/PG used is varied) Error: Damage valu...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.02 20:56:00
|
632. Boosters = Pay To Win - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buttercup Chipmint wrote: Why? Items purchasable by Aurum are "sidegrades" - that is, variations on the items available for ISK that do not differ significantly in power. Where is the ISK equivalent for these AUR boosters? Spin it however yo...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.01 20:13:00
|
633. Confirmed no vehical re-balance in 1.6 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Also 1.6 was NEVER promised to be a vehicle patch. I know you guys are frustrated and all but going around and labeling patch 1.5 is this but now its the NPE patch or labeling 1.6 as a vehicle patch before the patch...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.01 20:11:00
|
634. Confirmed no vehical re-balance in 1.6 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Exmaple Core wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: No. The major vehicle changes aren't going to be in 1.6. We ran into some integration issues with the existing work that's going to take a little too long to iron out. Same goes for...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.10.01 20:07:00
|
635. Why I'm not buying Omega Boosters - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Well, most importantly because I'm already having to choose between food and paying for the normal boosters BUT This item doesn't do anything but make all the pay-to-win arguments that much more powerful. It's reserved solely...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.09.30 18:22:00
|
636. You don't simply stop playing this game... - in The Locker Room [original thread]
That OCD is one hell of a thing.
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.09.28 03:40:00
|
637. Amarr Assault with 630+ armor - in General Discussions [original thread]
I saw it and all I can say is this: Why?
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.09.26 20:44:00
|
638. Pay ISK or Aurum to change Character name or race - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why don't we have that?
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.09.26 20:39:00
|
639. Don't get hyped for Gallente Heavy - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maitue Mae wrote: Dude, max the low slots on the Gal Heavy with speed boosters... Welp. Forgot about that insanity...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.09.26 00:19:00
|
640. Don't get hyped for Gallente Heavy - in General Discussions [original thread]
Here's why: If you take damage while on armor, then the movement gets reduced.
More hits received at once means far slower movement/sprinting speed.
The plates together with above mentioned means you'll just be good for point defense
...
- by Alldin Kan - at 2013.09.26 00:10:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |